Shweta Athilat1, Cynthia Joe1, Carmen B Rodriguez1, Mary Beth Terry2, Parisa Tehranifar3. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: pt140@cumc.columbia.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We investigated whether childhood body size is associated with midlife mammographic density, a strong risk factor for breast cancer. METHODS: We collected interview data, including body size at age 10 years using a pictogram, and measured height and weight from 518 women, recruited at the time of screening mammography in New York City (ages 40-64 years, 71% Hispanic, 68% foreign-born). We used linear regression models to examine childhood body size in relation to percent density and areas of dense and nondense tissue, measured using a computer-assisted method from digital mammograms. RESULTS: In models that adjusted for race/ethnicity, and age and body mass index at mammogram, the heaviest relative to leanest childhood body size was associated with 5.94% lower percent density (95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.20, -2.29), 7.69 cm2 smaller dense area (95% CI: -13.94, -0.63), and 26.17 cm2 larger nondense area (95% CI: 9.42, 43.58). In stratified analysis by menopausal status and nativity, the observed associations were stronger for postmenopausal and U.S.-born women although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy childhood body size is associated with lower mammographic density, consistent with its associations with breast cancer risk. Suggestive findings by nativity require confirmation in larger samples.
PURPOSE: We investigated whether childhood body size is associated with midlife mammographic density, a strong risk factor for breast cancer. METHODS: We collected interview data, including body size at age 10 years using a pictogram, and measured height and weight from 518 women, recruited at the time of screening mammography in New York City (ages 40-64 years, 71% Hispanic, 68% foreign-born). We used linear regression models to examine childhood body size in relation to percent density and areas of dense and nondense tissue, measured using a computer-assisted method from digital mammograms. RESULTS: In models that adjusted for race/ethnicity, and age and body mass index at mammogram, the heaviest relative to leanest childhood body size was associated with 5.94% lower percent density (95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.20, -2.29), 7.69 cm2 smaller dense area (95% CI: -13.94, -0.63), and 26.17 cm2 larger nondense area (95% CI: 9.42, 43.58). In stratified analysis by menopausal status and nativity, the observed associations were stronger for postmenopausal and U.S.-born women although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy childhood body size is associated with lower mammographic density, consistent with its associations with breast cancer risk. Suggestive findings by nativity require confirmation in larger samples.
Authors: Alison E Field; Debra L Franko; Ruth H Striegel-Moore; George B Schreiber; Patricia B Crawford; Stephen R Daniels Journal: Obes Res Date: 2004-07
Authors: Elizabeth M Poole; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson; Eva S Schernhammer; Michael N Pollak; Heather J Baer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Joanne F Dorgan; Catherine Klifa; John A Shepherd; Brian L Egleston; Peter O Kwiterovich; John H Himes; Kelley Gabriel; Linda Horn; Linda G Snetselaar; Victor J Stevens; Bruce A Barton; Alan M Robson; Norman L Lasser; Snehal Deshmukh; Nola M Hylton Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-07-13 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Heather J Baer; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Karin B Michels; Janet W Rich-Edwards; David J Hunter; Walter C Willett Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2005-02-18 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Natalie J Engmann; Marzieh K Golmakani; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Karla Kerlikowske Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Lusine Yaghjyan; Carmen Smotherman; John Heine; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Hannah Oh; Lusine Yaghjyan; Rebecca J Austin-Datta; Yujing J Heng; Gabrielle M Baker; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Adithya D Vellal; Laura C Collins; Divya Murthy; A Heather Eliassen; Bernard A Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 4.090