Literature DB >> 27497545

How wet should be the reaction coordinate for ligand unbinding?

Pratyush Tiwary1, B J Berne1.   

Abstract

We use a recently proposed method called Spectral Gap Optimization of Order Parameters (SGOOP) [P. Tiwary and B. J. Berne, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 2839 (2016)], to determine an optimal 1-dimensional reaction coordinate (RC) for the unbinding of a bucky-ball from a pocket in explicit water. This RC is estimated as a linear combination of the multiple available order parameters that collectively can be used to distinguish the various stable states relevant for unbinding. We pay special attention to determining and quantifying the degree to which water molecules should be included in the RC. Using SGOOP with under-sampled biased simulations, we predict that water plays a distinct role in the reaction coordinate for unbinding in the case when the ligand is sterically constrained to move along an axis of symmetry. This prediction is validated through extensive calculations of the unbinding times through metadynamics and by comparison through detailed balance with unbiased molecular dynamics estimate of the binding time. However when the steric constraint is removed, we find that the role of water in the reaction coordinate diminishes. Here instead SGOOP identifies a good one-dimensional RC involving various motional degrees of freedom.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27497545      PMCID: PMC4975749          DOI: 10.1063/1.4959969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  38 in total

1.  Mechanism of voltage gating in potassium channels.

Authors:  Morten Ø Jensen; Vishwanath Jogini; David W Borhani; Abba E Leffler; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reaction coordinates and rates from transition paths.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Identification of slow molecular order parameters for Markov model construction.

Authors:  Guillermo Pérez-Hernández; Fabian Paul; Toni Giorgino; Gianni De Fabritiis; Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Progress and challenges in the automated construction of Markov state models for full protein systems.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Kyle A Beauchamp; George Boxer; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Locating landmarks on high-dimensional free energy surfaces.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Tang-Qing Yu; Mark E Tuckerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  From metadynamics to dynamics.

Authors:  Pratyush Tiwary; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Solvent Fluctuations Induce Non-Markovian Kinetics in Hydrophobic Pocket-Ligand Binding.

Authors:  R Gregor Weiß; Piotr Setny; Joachim Dzubiella
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Enhancing Important Fluctuations: Rare Events and Metadynamics from a Conceptual Viewpoint.

Authors:  Omar Valsson; Pratyush Tiwary; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 12.703

9.  Fluctuations of water near extended hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces.

Authors:  Amish J Patel; Patrick Varilly; David Chandler
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Protein conformational plasticity and complex ligand-binding kinetics explored by atomistic simulations and Markov models.

Authors:  Nuria Plattner; Frank Noé
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  Role of Molecular Interactions and Protein Rearrangement in the Dissociation Kinetics of p38α MAP Kinase Type-I/II/III Inhibitors.

Authors:  Wanli You; Chia-En A Chang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Predicting reaction coordinates in energy landscapes with diffusion anisotropy.

Authors:  Pratyush Tiwary; B J Berne
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  A new approach to estimate atomic energies.

Authors:  Dariush H Zadeh
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  How and when does an anticancer drug leave its binding site?

Authors:  Pratyush Tiwary; Jagannath Mondal; B J Berne
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 14.136

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.