Literature DB >> 27497100

Increased risk of coronary artery calcification progression in subjects with high baseline Lp(a) levels: The Kangbuk Samsung Health Study.

Jung Hwan Cho1, Da Young Lee1, Eun Seo Lee1, Jihyun Kim1, Se Eun Park1, Cheol-Young Park1, Won-Young Lee1, Ki-Won Oh1, Sung-Woo Park1, Eun-Jung Rhee2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results from previous studies support the association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels and coronary artery disease risk. In this study, we analyzed the association between baseline Lp(a) levels and future progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC) in apparently healthy Korean adults.
METHODS: A total of 2611 participants (mean age: 41years, 92% mend) who underwent a routine health check-up in 2010 and 2014 were enrolled. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) were measured by multi-detector computed tomography. Baseline Lp(a) was measured by high-sensitivity immunoturbidimetric assay. Progression of CAC was defined as a change in CACS >0 over four years.
RESULTS: Bivariate correlation analyses with baseline Lp(a) and other metabolic parameters revealed age, total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C and CACS to have a significant positive correlation, while body weight, fasting glucose level, blood pressure and triglyceride level were negatively correlated with baseline Lp(a) level. After four years of follow-up, 635 subjects (24.3%) had CAC progression. The participants who had CAC progression were older, composed of more men, more obese, and had higher fasting glucose levels and worse baseline lipid profiles compared to those who did not have CAC progression. The mean serum Lp(a) level was significantly higher in subjects who had CAC progression compared to those who did not (32.5 vs. 28.9mg/dL, p<0.01). When the risk for CAC progression according to baseline Lp(a) was calculated, those with Lp(a) level≥50mg/dL had an odds ratio of 1.333 (95% CI 1.027-1.730) for CAC progression compared to those with Lp(a)<50mg/dL after adjusting for confounding factors.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the subjects who had higher Lp(a) were at significantly higher risk for CAC progression after four years of follow-up, suggesting the role of high Lp(a) in CAC progression.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery calcification; Lipoprotein(a); Progression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27497100     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  3 in total

1.  Lipoprotein (a) and coronary artery calcification: prospective study assessing interactions with other risk factors.

Authors:  Kwok Leung Ong; Robyn L McClelland; Matthew A Allison; Mary Cushman; Parveen K Garg; Michael Y Tsai; Kerry-Anne Rye; Fatiha Tabet
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 8.694

2.  The Correlation of Dyslipidemia with the Extent of Coronary Artery Disease in the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Moshrik Abd Alamir; Michael Goyfman; Adib Chaus; Firas Dabbous; Leslie Tamura; Veit Sandfort; Alan Brown; Mathew Budoff
Journal:  J Lipids       Date:  2018-03-27

3.  New Model for Predicting the Presence of Coronary Artery Calcification.

Authors:  Samel Park; Min Hong; HwaMin Lee; Nam-Jun Cho; Eun-Young Lee; Won-Young Lee; Eun-Jung Rhee; Hyo-Wook Gil
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.