Kwok Leung Ong1, Robyn L McClelland2, Matthew A Allison3, Mary Cushman4, Parveen K Garg5, Michael Y Tsai6, Kerry-Anne Rye7, Fatiha Tabet8. 1. Lipid Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: oklws@yahoo.com.hk. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 4. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. 5. Division of Cardiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 7. Lipid Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 8. Lipid Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: fatiha.tabet@yahoo.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elevated plasma lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and coronary artery calcification (CAC) are established cardiovascular risk factors that correlate with each other. We hypothesized that other cardiovascular risk factors could affect their relationship. METHODS: We tested for interactions of 24 study variables related to dyslipidemia, diabetes, insulin resistance, hypertension, inflammation and coagulation with baseline Lp(a) on change in CAC volume and density over 9.5 years in 5975 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) participants, free of apparent cardiovascular disease at baseline. RESULTS: Elevated Lp(a) was associated with larger absolute increase in CAC volume (3.21 and 4.45 mm3/year higher for Lp(a) ≥30 versus <30 mg/dL, and Lp(a) ≥50 versus <50 mg/dL, respectively), but not relative change in CAC volume. No association was found with change in CAC density when assessing continuous ln-transformed Lp(a). The association between elevated Lp(a) (≥30 mg/dL) and absolute change in CAC volume was greater in participants with higher circulating levels of interleukin-2 soluble receptor α, soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor 1 and fibrinogen (15.33, 11.81 and 7.02 mm3/year in quartile 4, compared to -3.44, -0.59 and 1.91 mm3/year in quartile 1, respectively). No significant interaction was found for other study variables. Similar interactions were seen when assessing Lp(a) levels ≥50 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated Lp(a) was associated with an absolute increase in CAC volume, especially in participants with higher levels of selected markers of inflammation and coagulation. These results suggest Lp(a) as a potential biomarker for CAC volume progression.
BACKGROUND: Elevated plasma lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and coronary artery calcification (CAC) are established cardiovascular risk factors that correlate with each other. We hypothesized that other cardiovascular risk factors could affect their relationship. METHODS: We tested for interactions of 24 study variables related to dyslipidemia, diabetes, insulin resistance, hypertension, inflammation and coagulation with baseline Lp(a) on change in CAC volume and density over 9.5 years in 5975 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) participants, free of apparent cardiovascular disease at baseline. RESULTS: Elevated Lp(a) was associated with larger absolute increase in CAC volume (3.21 and 4.45 mm3/year higher for Lp(a) ≥30 versus <30 mg/dL, and Lp(a) ≥50 versus <50 mg/dL, respectively), but not relative change in CAC volume. No association was found with change in CAC density when assessing continuous ln-transformed Lp(a). The association between elevated Lp(a) (≥30 mg/dL) and absolute change in CAC volume was greater in participants with higher circulating levels of interleukin-2 soluble receptor α, soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor 1 and fibrinogen (15.33, 11.81 and 7.02 mm3/year in quartile 4, compared to -3.44, -0.59 and 1.91 mm3/year in quartile 1, respectively). No significant interaction was found for other study variables. Similar interactions were seen when assessing Lp(a) levels ≥50 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated Lp(a) was associated with an absolute increase in CAC volume, especially in participants with higher levels of selected markers of inflammation and coagulation. These results suggest Lp(a) as a potential biomarker for CAC volume progression.
Authors: Sotirios Tsimikas; Sergio Fazio; Keith C Ferdinand; Henry N Ginsberg; Marlys L Koschinsky; Santica M Marcovina; Patrick M Moriarty; Daniel J Rader; Alan T Remaley; Gissette Reyes-Soffer; Raul D Santos; George Thanassoulis; Joseph L Witztum; Simhan Danthi; Michelle Olive; Lijuan Liu Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Donna K Arnett; Robyn L McClelland; Alan Bank; David A Bluemke; Mary Cushman; Alexander J Szalai; Nishank Jain; Antoinette S Gomes; Susan R Heckbert; W Gregory Hundley; João A Lima Journal: Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet Date: 2011-11-28