Literature DB >> 27496855

Comparison of Dabigatran and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease: The RE-LY Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy).

Michael D Ezekowitz1, Rangadham Nagarakanti2, Herbert Noack2, Martina Brueckmann2, Claire Litherland2, Mark Jacobs2, Andreas Clemens2, Paul A Reilly2, Stuart J Connolly2, Salim Yusuf2, Lars Wallentin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The RE-LY trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy) compared dabigatran 150 and 110 mg twice daily with warfarin in 18 113 patients with atrial fibrillation. Those with prosthetic heart valves, significant mitral stenosis, and valvular heart disease (VHD) requiring intervention were excluded. Others with VHD were included.
METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the RE-LY trial.
RESULTS: There were 3950 patients with any VHD: 3101 had mitral regurgitation, 1179 with tricuspid regurgitation, 817 had aortic regurgitation, 471 with aortic stenosis, and 193 with mild mitral stenosis. At baseline, patients with any VHD had more heart failure, coronary disease, renal impairment, and persistent atrial fibrillation. Patients with any VHD had higher rates of major bleeds (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.5) but similar stroke or systemic embolism event rates (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.88-1.33). For patients receiving dabigatran 110 mg, major bleed rates were lower than for patients taking warfarin (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95 with VHD; HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99 without VHD), and major bleed rates for dabigatran 150 mg were similar to those for warfarin in patients with VHD (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.64-1.06) or without VHD (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83-1.15). For dabigatran 150 mg, stroke/systemic embolic event rates were lower compared with warfarin in those with VHD (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.93) and those without VHD (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.86), and stroke/systemic embolic event rates were similar for warfarin and dabigatran 110 mg regardless of the presence of VHD (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.65-1.45; and HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.70-1.10). Intracranial bleeds and death rates for dabigatran 150 and 110 mg were lower compared with warfarin independently of the presence of VHD.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of any VHD did not influence the comparison of dabigatran with warfarin. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; stroke; valvular heart diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27496855     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  36 in total

Review 1.  Dabigatran Etexilate: A Review in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hannah A Blair; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Rivaroxaban in patients undergoing surgical mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Feridoun Noohi; Parham Sadeghipour; Sirous Kordrostami; Omid Shafe; Majid Maleki; Majid Kyavar; Hooman Bakhshandeh; Yousef Rezaei; Mehrad Rokni; Jamal Moosavi; Ahmad Amin; Ahmad Tashakori Beheshti; Saeid Hosseini
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Can Direct Oral Anticoagulants Be Used for Stroke Prevention Among Patients with Valvular Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors:  Sarah L Anderson; Joel C Marrs
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Direct oral anticoagulant use in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with valvular heart disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ryan E Owens; Rajesh Kabra; Carrie S Oliphant
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  Evolving cardiovascular uses of direct-acting oral anticoagulants: a paradigm shift on the horizon?

Authors:  Emanuel Raschi; Matteo Bianchin; Cecilia Fantoni; Walter Ageno; Fabrizio De Ponti; Roberto De Ponti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Drug therapy in anticoagulation: which drug for which patient?

Authors:  Carolyn M Millar; Mike A Laffan
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 7.  Big Data and Atrial Fibrillation: Current Understanding and New Opportunities.

Authors:  Qian-Chen Wang; Zhen-Yu Wang
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 8.  Current status of oral anticoagulant reversal strategies: a review.

Authors:  Aranyak Rawal; Devarshi Ardeshna; Sheharyar Minhas; Brandon Cave; Uzoma Ibeguogu; Rami Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 9.  The management of atrial fibrillation in heart failure: an expert panel consensus.

Authors:  Dimitrios Farmakis; Christina Chrysohoou; Gregory Giamouzis; George Giannakoulas; Michalis Hamilos; Katerina Naka; Stylianos Tzeis; Sotirios Xydonas; Apostolos Karavidas; John Parissis
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Intracardiac thrombus in a patient with mitral bioprosthesis and atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoaugulant: A case report.

Authors:  Myriam D'Angelo; Roberta Manganaro; Ilaria Boretti; Daniele Giacopelli; Gaetano Cannavà; Francesco Corallo; Placido Bramanti; Antonio Duca
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.