| Literature DB >> 31660310 |
Aranyak Rawal1, Devarshi Ardeshna2, Sheharyar Minhas3, Brandon Cave4, Uzoma Ibeguogu5, Rami Khouzam5.
Abstract
Utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have steadily increased since their approval and are now recommended over warfarin for both stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). With increased DOAC use, the number of major bleeding events requiring medical intervention will continue to rise. Until 2015, warfarin maintained an advantage as the only oral anticoagulant with a specific reversal agent. Since then, idarucizumab has been approved for dabigatran reversal and recently, andexanet alfa was granted approval for the reversal of apixaban or rivaroxaban in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding events. Due to the manufacturing practices required to yield these reversal therapies, they are available at high cost to hospital systems and as a result, have been met with resistance. Data exists describing both prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) and andexanet alfa for DOAC reversal, however, without head-to-head comparison. Until future studies are available, current literature must be critically evaluated to aid in the clinical decision-making process of how to treat patients with life-threatening DOAC-related bleeding. 2019 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; andexanet alfa; direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC); direct thrombin inhibitor reversal; direct thrombin inhibitors; factor Xa inhibitors; factor Xa inhibitors reversal; idarucizumab; oral anticoagulant reversal; venous thromboembolism (VTE)
Year: 2019 PMID: 31660310 PMCID: PMC6787376 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839