EunSeok Cha1, James M Crowe2, Betty J Braxter3, Bonnie Mowinski Jennings4. 1. College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea. Electronic address: echa5@cnu.ac.kr. 2. School of Social Service Administration, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 3. School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 4. College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Abstract
To better understand health-related decision making among overweight and obese emerging adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used in the parent study involving overweight and obese emerging adults, ages 18-29 years. The goal of the parent study was to screen participants' diabetes risk and identify characteristics of emerging adults with prediabetes (N=107). A sub-sample of respondents (n=34) from the parent study were invited to participate in focus group interviews depending on whether they had prediabetes (three groups) or they did not have prediabetes (four groups). Each focus group interview lasted 90-120 minutes following a semi-structured interview guide. Conventional content analysis was used in the data analysis. Because of the similarities between participants with and without prediabetes, the findings were synthesized and reported in the aggregate. Moreover, during the analysis, the authors decided that rational choice theory provided a useful organizing structure for presenting the data. RESULTS: Emerging adults' behavioral decisions were rational reactions to their personal competence, perception of health, environment, and availability of resources to handle problems. Calculation of trade-offs and estimations of resource availability were often used when making decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Emerging adults choose unhealthy behaviors due to inaccurate information and insufficient competence to practice healthy lifestyles rather than because of laziness or being irrational. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Behavioral interventions for emerging adults need to help them develop skills to enhance health literacy and problem solving, thereby enhancing their awareness of available resources and decreasing the perceived cost of making healthy choices. Copyright Â
To better understand health-related decision making among overweight and obese emerging adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used in the parent study involving overweight and obese emerging adults, ages 18-29 years. The goal of the parent study was to screen participants' diabetes risk and identify characteristics of emerging adults with prediabetes (N=107). A sub-sample of respondents (n=34) from the parent study were invited to participate in focus group interviews depending on whether they had prediabetes (three groups) or they did not have prediabetes (four groups). Each focus group interview lasted 90-120 minutes following a semi-structured interview guide. Conventional content analysis was used in the data analysis. Because of the similarities between participants with and without prediabetes, the findings were synthesized and reported in the aggregate. Moreover, during the analysis, the authors decided that rational choice theory provided a useful organizing structure for presenting the data. RESULTS: Emerging adults' behavioral decisions were rational reactions to their personal competence, perception of health, environment, and availability of resources to handle problems. Calculation of trade-offs and estimations of resource availability were often used when making decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Emerging adults choose unhealthy behaviors due to inaccurate information and insufficient competence to practice healthy lifestyles rather than because of laziness or being irrational. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Behavioral interventions for emerging adults need to help them develop skills to enhance health literacy and problem solving, thereby enhancing their awareness of available resources and decreasing the perceived cost of making healthy choices. Copyright Â
Authors: EunSeok Cha; Margeaux K Akazawa; Kevin H Kim; Colleen R Dawkins; Hannah M Lerner; Guillermo Umpierrez; Sandra B Dunbar Journal: Nurs Health Sci Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 1.857
Authors: Dustin T Duncan; Kathleen Y Wolin; Melissa Scharoun-Lee; Eric L Ding; Erica T Warner; Gary G Bennett Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Katharine C Garvey; Margaret G Beste; Donna Luff; Astrid Atakov-Castillo; Howard A Wolpert; Marilyn D Ritholz Journal: Adolesc Health Med Ther Date: 2014-10-20
Authors: Mercedes R Carnethon; Barbara Sternfeld; Pamela J Schreiner; David R Jacobs; Cora E Lewis; Kiang Liu; Stephen Sidney Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-03-26 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Vanessa J Friedman; Cassandra J C Wright; Annika Molenaar; Tracy McCaffrey; Linda Brennan; Megan S C Lim Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Kimberley H Seear; Matthew P Lelievre; David N Atkinson; Julia V Marley Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-24 Impact factor: 3.390