Sophie Terp1, Seth A Seabury2, Sanjay Arora1, Andrew Eads3, Chun Nok Lam3, Michael Menchine1. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: terp@usc.edu. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine the incidence of and trends in enforcement of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) during the past decade. METHODS: We obtained a comprehensive list of all EMTALA investigations conducted between 2005 and 2014 directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) through a Freedom of Information Act request. Characteristics of EMTALA investigations and resulting citation for violations during the study period are described. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2014, there were 4,772 investigations, of which 2,118 (44%) resulted in citations for EMTALA deficiencies at 1,498 (62%) of 2,417 hospitals investigated. Investigations were conducted at 43% of hospitals with CMS provider agreements, and citations issued at 27%. On average, 9% of hospitals were investigated and 4.3% were cited for EMTALA violation annually. The proportion of hospitals subject to EMTALA investigation decreased from 10.8% to 7.2%, and citations from 5.3% to 3.2%, between 2005 and 2014. There were 3.9 EMTALA investigations and 1.7 citations per million emergency department (ED) visits during the study period. CONCLUSION: We report the first national estimates of EMTALA enforcement activities in more than a decade. Although EMTALA investigations and citations were common at the hospital level, they were rare at the ED-visit level. CMS actively pursued EMTALA investigations and issued citations throughout the study period, with half of hospitals subject to EMTALA investigations and a quarter receiving a citation for EMTALA violation, although there was a declining trend in enforcement. Further investigation is needed to determine the effect of EMTALA on access to or quality of emergency care.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine the incidence of and trends in enforcement of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) during the past decade. METHODS: We obtained a comprehensive list of all EMTALA investigations conducted between 2005 and 2014 directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) through a Freedom of Information Act request. Characteristics of EMTALA investigations and resulting citation for violations during the study period are described. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2014, there were 4,772 investigations, of which 2,118 (44%) resulted in citations for EMTALA deficiencies at 1,498 (62%) of 2,417 hospitals investigated. Investigations were conducted at 43% of hospitals with CMS provider agreements, and citations issued at 27%. On average, 9% of hospitals were investigated and 4.3% were cited for EMTALA violation annually. The proportion of hospitals subject to EMTALA investigation decreased from 10.8% to 7.2%, and citations from 5.3% to 3.2%, between 2005 and 2014. There were 3.9 EMTALA investigations and 1.7 citations per million emergency department (ED) visits during the study period. CONCLUSION: We report the first national estimates of EMTALA enforcement activities in more than a decade. Although EMTALA investigations and citations were common at the hospital level, they were rare at the ED-visit level. CMS actively pursued EMTALA investigations and issued citations throughout the study period, with half of hospitals subject to EMTALA investigations and a quarter receiving a citation for EMTALA violation, although there was a declining trend in enforcement. Further investigation is needed to determine the effect of EMTALA on access to or quality of emergency care.
Authors: K John McConnell; Loren A Johnson; Nadia Arab; Christopher F Richards; Craig D Newgard; Tina Edlund Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2007-01-08 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: William M McDonnell; Christopher A Gee; Nancy Mecham; Jessica Dahl-Olsen; Elisabeth Guenther Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Rachel A Lindor; Ronna L Campbell; Jesse M Pines; Gabrielle J Melin; Agnes M Schipper; Deepi G Goyal; Annie T Sadosty Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Sophie Terp; Brandon Wang; Elizabeth Burner; Denton Connor; Seth A Seabury; Michael Menchine Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Todd W Lyons; Karen L Olson; Nathan P Palmer; Reed Horwitz; Kenneth D Mandl; Andrew M Fine Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Ryan M McKenna; Jonathan Purtle; Katherine L Nelson; Dylan H Roby; Marsha Regenstein; Alexander N Ortega Journal: AIMS Public Health Date: 2018-10-08