Literature DB >> 27495350

Design Considerations of a Fiber Optic Pressure Sensor Protective Housing for Intramuscular Pressure Measurements.

Shanette A Go1,2, Elisabeth R Jensen1, Shawn M O'Connor3,4, Loribeth Q Evertz1, Duane A Morrow5, Samuel R Ward3,4, Richard L Lieber3,4,6,7, Kenton R Kaufman8.   

Abstract

Intramuscular pressure (IMP), defined as skeletal muscle interstitial fluid pressure, reflects changes in individual muscle tension and may provide crucial insight into musculoskeletal biomechanics and pathologies. IMP may be measured using fiber-optic fluid pressure sensors, provided the sensor is adequately anchored to and shielded from surrounding muscle tissue. Ineffective anchoring enables sensor motion and inadequate shielding facilitates direct sensor-tissue interaction, which result in measurement artifacts and force-IMP dissociation. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of polyimide and nitinol protective housing designs to anchor pressure sensors to muscle tissue, prevent IMP measurement artifacts, and optimize the force-IMP correlation. Anchoring capacity was quantified as force required to dislodge sensors from muscle tissue. Force-IMP correlations and non-physiological measurement artifacts were quantified during isometric muscle activations of the rabbit tibialis anterior. Housing structural integrity was assessed after both anchoring and activation testing. Although there was no statistically significant difference in anchoring capacity, nitinol housings demonstrated greater structural integrity and superior force-IMP correlations. Further design improvements are needed to prevent tissue accumulation in the housing recess associated with artificially high IMP measurements. These findings emphasize fundamental protective housing design elements crucial for achieving reliable IMP measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Force; Isometric activation; Microsensor; Skeletal muscle; Tibialis anterior

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27495350      PMCID: PMC5292313          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1703-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  14 in total

1.  Performance characteristics of a pressure microsensor.

Authors:  Kenton R Kaufman; Tom Wavering; Duane Morrow; Jennifer Davis; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Relationship between muscle stress and intramuscular pressure during dynamic muscle contractions.

Authors:  Samuel R Ward; Jennifer Davis; Kenton R Kaufman; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  The wick catheter technique for measurement of intramuscular pressure. A new research and clinical tool.

Authors:  S J Mubarak; A R Hargens; C A Owen; L P Garetto; W H Akeson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.

Authors:  Catherine O Fritz; Peter E Morris; Jennifer J Richler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08-08

5.  The design of an optical fiber pressure transducer for use in the upper airways.

Authors:  P D Goodyer; J C Fothergill; N B Jones; C D Hanning
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Intramuscular pressures for monitoring different tasks and muscle conditions.

Authors:  O M Sejersted; A R Hargens
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Intramuscular pressure and electromyography as indexes of force during isokinetic exercise.

Authors:  M Aratow; R E Ballard; A G Crenshaw; J Styf; D E Watenpaugh; N J Kahan; A R Hargens
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1993-06

8.  Intramuscular fluid pressure during isometric contraction of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  O M Sejersted; A R Hargens; K R Kardel; P Blom; O Jensen; L Hermansen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1984-02

9.  Correlation between isometric force and intramuscular pressure in rabbit tibialis anterior muscle with an intact anterior compartment.

Authors:  Taylor M Winters; Genaro S Sepulveda; Patrick S Cottler; Kenton R Kaufman; Richard L Lieber; Samuel R Ward
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Skeletal muscle architecture of the rabbit hindlimb: functional implications of muscle design.

Authors:  R L Lieber; F T Blevins
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.804

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluate muscle tension using intramuscular pressure device in rabbit tibialis anterior model for improved tendon transfer surgery.

Authors:  Loribeth Q Evertz; Liselotte F Bulstra; Alexander Y Shin; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Evaluating skeletal muscle electromechanical delay with intramuscular pressure.

Authors:  Shanette A Go; William J Litchy; Loribeth Q Evertz; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Sensor Anchoring Improves the Correlation Between Intramuscular Pressure and Muscle Tension in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Shawn M O'Connor; Kenton R Kaufman; Samuel R Ward; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Modeling Skeletal Muscle Stress and Intramuscular Pressure: A Whole Muscle Active-Passive Approach.

Authors:  Benjamin B Wheatley; Gregory M Odegard; Kenton R Kaufman; Tammy L Haut Donahue
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.