Sushmita D Lahiri1, Richard A Alm2. 1. Infection Innovative Medicines Unit, AstraZeneca R&D Boston, Waltham, MA, USA. 2. Infection Innovative Medicines Unit, AstraZeneca R&D Boston, Waltham, MA, USA ralm@macrolide.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Ceftaroline (the active metabolite of ceftaroline fosamil) is a cephalosporin that possesses activity against MRSA due to its differentiating high affinity for PBP2a. It is known that PBP2a sequence variations, including some outside of the transpeptidase-binding pocket, impact ceftaroline susceptibility and recent evidence suggests involvement of non-PBP2a mechanisms in ceftaroline resistance. This study evaluated the potential of ceftaroline to select for resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones during serial passage. METHODS: Selection experiments were performed by up to 20 daily passages of three S. aureus isolates (two MRSA and one MSSA) in broth with increasing selective pressure. Mutants that emerged were tested for changes in ceftaroline susceptibility and genetically characterized. RESULTS: The MSSA isolate developed mutations in PBP2 and PBP3 that increased the ceftaroline MIC by 16-fold and increased the MICs of other β-lactams. A Glu447Lys substitution in the PBP2a transpeptidase pocket in one MRSA isolate elevated the ceftaroline MIC to 8 mg/L. Selective pressure in a ceftaroline-resistant MRSA isolate generated mutations in LytD, as well as changes in the pbp4 promoter previously shown to result in PBP4 overexpression, the one PBP not inhibited by ceftaroline. Elevated ceftaroline MIC was reversed when tested in combination with extremely low levels of methicillin or meropenem that could inhibit the function of PBP4. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that resistance to ceftaroline can be manifested through numerous mechanisms. Further, they support a hypothesis where PBP4 can functionally provide the essential transpeptidase activity required for MRSA cell wall biogenesis when PBP2a is inhibited.
OBJECTIVES:Ceftaroline (the active metabolite of ceftaroline fosamil) is a cephalosporin that possesses activity against MRSA due to its differentiating high affinity for PBP2a. It is known that PBP2a sequence variations, including some outside of the transpeptidase-binding pocket, impact ceftaroline susceptibility and recent evidence suggests involvement of non-PBP2a mechanisms in ceftaroline resistance. This study evaluated the potential of ceftaroline to select for resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones during serial passage. METHODS: Selection experiments were performed by up to 20 daily passages of three S. aureus isolates (two MRSA and one MSSA) in broth with increasing selective pressure. Mutants that emerged were tested for changes in ceftaroline susceptibility and genetically characterized. RESULTS: The MSSA isolate developed mutations in PBP2 and PBP3 that increased the ceftaroline MIC by 16-fold and increased the MICs of other β-lactams. A Glu447Lys substitution in the PBP2a transpeptidase pocket in one MRSA isolate elevated the ceftaroline MIC to 8 mg/L. Selective pressure in a ceftaroline-resistant MRSA isolate generated mutations in LytD, as well as changes in the pbp4 promoter previously shown to result in PBP4 overexpression, the one PBP not inhibited by ceftaroline. Elevated ceftaroline MIC was reversed when tested in combination with extremely low levels of methicillin or meropenem that could inhibit the function of PBP4. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that resistance to ceftaroline can be manifested through numerous mechanisms. Further, they support a hypothesis where PBP4 can functionally provide the essential transpeptidase activity required for MRSA cell wall biogenesis when PBP2a is inhibited.
Authors: Kiran V Mahasenan; Rafael Molina; Renee Bouley; María T Batuecas; Jed F Fisher; Juan A Hermoso; Mayland Chang; Shahriar Mobashery Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Adam J Schaenzer; Nathan Wlodarchak; David H Drewry; William J Zuercher; Warren E Rose; Carla A Ferrer; John-Demian Sauer; Rob Striker Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 5.084
Authors: J Chase McNeil; Lauren M Sommer; Jesus G Vallejo; Kristina G Hulten; Sheldon L Kaplan; Anthony R Flores Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Daniel G Lloyd; Benjamin J Schofield; Matthew R Goddard; Edward J Taylor Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: J Andrew N Alexander; Som S Chatterjee; Stephanie M Hamilton; Lindsay D Eltis; Henry F Chambers; Natalie C J Strynadka Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Mohamad Hamad; Farah Al-Marzooq; Vunnam Srinivasulu; Hany A Omar; Ashna Sulaiman; Dana M Zaher; Gorka Orive; Taleb H Al-Tel Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Helio S Sader; Paul R Rhomberg; Timothy B Doyle; Robert K Flamm; Rodrigo E Mendes Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 5.948