Literature DB >> 27494915

Identification of non-PBP2a resistance mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus after serial passage with ceftaroline: involvement of other PBPs.

Sushmita D Lahiri1, Richard A Alm2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ceftaroline (the active metabolite of ceftaroline fosamil) is a cephalosporin that possesses activity against MRSA due to its differentiating high affinity for PBP2a. It is known that PBP2a sequence variations, including some outside of the transpeptidase-binding pocket, impact ceftaroline susceptibility and recent evidence suggests involvement of non-PBP2a mechanisms in ceftaroline resistance. This study evaluated the potential of ceftaroline to select for resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones during serial passage.
METHODS: Selection experiments were performed by up to 20 daily passages of three S. aureus isolates (two MRSA and one MSSA) in broth with increasing selective pressure. Mutants that emerged were tested for changes in ceftaroline susceptibility and genetically characterized.
RESULTS: The MSSA isolate developed mutations in PBP2 and PBP3 that increased the ceftaroline MIC by 16-fold and increased the MICs of other β-lactams. A Glu447Lys substitution in the PBP2a transpeptidase pocket in one MRSA isolate elevated the ceftaroline MIC to 8 mg/L. Selective pressure in a ceftaroline-resistant MRSA isolate generated mutations in LytD, as well as changes in the pbp4 promoter previously shown to result in PBP4 overexpression, the one PBP not inhibited by ceftaroline. Elevated ceftaroline MIC was reversed when tested in combination with extremely low levels of methicillin or meropenem that could inhibit the function of PBP4.
CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that resistance to ceftaroline can be manifested through numerous mechanisms. Further, they support a hypothesis where PBP4 can functionally provide the essential transpeptidase activity required for MRSA cell wall biogenesis when PBP2a is inhibited.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27494915     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  10 in total

1.  Conformational Dynamics in Penicillin-Binding Protein 2a of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Allosteric Communication Network and Enablement of Catalysis.

Authors:  Kiran V Mahasenan; Rafael Molina; Renee Bouley; María T Batuecas; Jed F Fisher; Juan A Hermoso; Mayland Chang; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  GW779439X and Its Pyrazolopyridazine Derivatives Inhibit the Serine/Threonine Kinase Stk1 and Act As Antibiotic Adjuvants against β-Lactam-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Adam J Schaenzer; Nathan Wlodarchak; David H Drewry; William J Zuercher; Warren E Rose; Carla A Ferrer; John-Demian Sauer; Rob Striker
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.084

3.  Reduced Ceftaroline Susceptibility among Invasive MRSA Infections in Children: a Clinical and Genomic Investigation.

Authors:  J Chase McNeil; Lauren M Sommer; Jesus G Vallejo; Kristina G Hulten; Sheldon L Kaplan; Anthony R Flores
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 5.938

4.  De Novo Resistance to Arg10-Teixobactin Occurs Slowly and Is Costly.

Authors:  Daniel G Lloyd; Benjamin J Schofield; Matthew R Goddard; Edward J Taylor
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Structural and kinetic analyses of penicillin-binding protein 4 (PBP4)-mediated antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J Andrew N Alexander; Som S Chatterjee; Stephanie M Hamilton; Lindsay D Eltis; Henry F Chambers; Natalie C J Strynadka
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Susceptibility to ceftobiprole of respiratory-tract pathogens collected in the United Kingdom and Ireland during 2014-2015.

Authors:  Anne Santerre Henriksen; Jennifer I Smart; Kamal Hamed
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Mechanisms of action and antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole.

Authors:  M I Morosini; M Díez-Aguilar; R Cantón
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.553

8.  Narrow-Spectrum Antibacterial Agents-Benefits and Challenges.

Authors:  Richard A Alm; Sushmita D Lahiri
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-17

9.  Antibacterial Activity of Small Molecules Which Eradicate Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Persisters.

Authors:  Mohamad Hamad; Farah Al-Marzooq; Vunnam Srinivasulu; Hany A Omar; Ashna Sulaiman; Dana M Zaher; Gorka Orive; Taleb H Al-Tel
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Evaluation of the Revised Ceftaroline Disk Diffusion Breakpoints When Testing a Challenge Collection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Paul R Rhomberg; Timothy B Doyle; Robert K Flamm; Rodrigo E Mendes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.