Literature DB >> 27493535

Distinct Conformation of ATP Molecule in Solution and on Protein.

Eri Kobayashi1, Kei Yura2, Yoshinori Nagai3.   

Abstract

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is a versatile molecule used mainly for energy and a phosphate source. The hydrolysis of γ phosphate initiates the reactions and these reactions almost always start when ATP binds to protein. Therefore, there should be a mechanism to prevent spontaneous hydrolysis reaction and a mechanism to lead ATP to a pure energy source or to a phosphate source. To address these questions, we extensively analyzed the effect of protein to ATP conformation based on the sampling of the ATP solution conformations obtained from molecular dynamics simulation and the sampling of ATP structures bound to protein found in a protein structure database. The comparison revealed mainly the following three points; 1) The ribose ring in ATP molecule, which puckers in many ways in solution, tends to assume either C2' exo or C2' endo when it binds to protein. 2) The adenine ring in ATP molecule, which takes open-book motion with the two ring structures, has two distinct structures when ATP binds to protein. 3) The glycosyl-bond and the bond between phosphate and the ribose have unique torsion angles, when ATP binds to protein. The combination of torsion angles found in protein-bound forms is under-represented in ATP molecule in water. These findings suggest that ATP-binding protein exerts forces on ATP molecule to assume a conformation that is rarely found in solution, and that this conformation change should be a trigger for the reactions on ATP molecule.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenosine triphosphate; curvature; database analysis; molecular dynamics simulation; torsion angle

Year:  2013        PMID: 27493535      PMCID: PMC4629688          DOI: 10.2142/biophysics.9.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophysics (Nagoya-shi)        ISSN: 1349-2942


Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is a widely used molecule in the cell for an energy source1. A textbook example of the use of ATP is a chemical bond formation between two substrates coupled with ATP hydrolysis catalyzed by an enzyme. In this reaction, a phosphoanhydride bond between β and γ phosphate groups is cleaved, and the released energy is used to condense the substrates. The released energy can also be a trigger for alteration of the conformation of protein2. In either case, the remaining adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and the inorganic phosphate are released to water. Some of the reactions yield an inorganic diphosphate by cleaving the bond between α and β phosphate groups3. Other than the reaction to gain energy, ATP is utilized as a source for phosphate group, adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and adenine. These chemical groups are utilized for phosphorylation that transfers the inorganic phosphate to the substrate4, adenylation that transfers AMP to the substrate5, and adenosylation that transfers adenosyl to the substrate6, respectively. The use of the same ATP molecules in a variety of chemical reactions is evidently based on its versatility in the conformation, but the mechanism for regulating the conformation for distinct functions has not been addressed. The ATP molecule that undertakes a hydrolysis between β and γ phosphate groups, for instance, should block the chemical reaction pathways to phosphorylation, adenylation and others, otherwise the unrelated functions would be carried out. In addition, ATP molecule in water needs to have a certain mechanism to stay away from the chemically reactive situations leading to a spontaneous hydrolysis. These conjectures can be tested by protein structure database analysis and computer simulation. Accumulation of the coordinate data of ATP bound to the proteins enabled us to obtain ATP conformations on proteins at the variety of functions. Improvements in simulation techniques and computer hardware enable us to sample conformations of ATP in water. Comparisons of these ATP conformations will give us a clue to solidify the conjecture. Here, we compared the structures of ATP molecules in Protein Data Bank (PDB)7 and those sampled from the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. We found that the conformation of protein-bound ATP is under-represented in ATP in water, which suggests that ATP molecule should be forced to take a specific conformation on a protein to initiate biological functions.

Methods

Choosing proteins with ATP molecule from PDB

Three-dimensional coordinate data of protein structure with ATP were selected from PDB7. The protein entries with coordinates of ATP were first selected on Het-PDB Navi.8 using “ATP” as a query term. Redundancy in entries was eliminated by grouping the proteins with their sequence identity. The interactions between protein chain and ATP molecule were detected by differences in accessible surface areas of the protein chain when the area was calculated with and without the ATP molecule. We calculated the accessible surface area by the in-house program and the program is now available at http://cib.cf.ocha.ac.jp/bitool/ASA/. The calculation is based on the method of Shrake and Rupley9. Chains with less than 60 amino acid residues were discarded. Classification of proteins by sequence identity was carried out using BLASTClust10. The sequence identity for the classification was set to 25%. From each group, a protein chain with the best resolution was selected as the representative.

Conformation sampling of ATP molecule by molecular dynamics simulation

Molecular dynamics simulation of ATP was performed to sample conformations of ATP in water. The initial structure of ATP was taken from the three-dimensional structure data of Thermus thermophilus D-alanine:D-alanine ligase (PDB ID, 2zdq)11. The ATP numbered 1501 in A chain was used. For the calculation, GROMACS 4.0.412 was used. We employed a standard NPT procedure for the simulation described in the manual of GROMACS. We used the force field for ATP molecule implemented in ffG43a1.rtp file. The file described the parameters for all the atoms of ATP except for methyl hydrogen atoms, which were united to the bonded carbon atoms. A hydrogen atom not described in PDB file was geometrically generated at an allowed position. The geometric center of the ATP molecule was then placed at the center of a cube with 2.7×104 Å3 volume filled with water molecules with periodic boundary condition. By removing water molecule overlapping with ATP, the number of water molecules was settled to 876. After minimizing the energy of the system by steepest decent method and performing molecular dynamics with restraint on ATP in 1 ns, we performed 2 ns simulation of ATP in solvent with 2 fs step size. The temperature was set in 300 K. Cutoff distance of van der Waals and electrostatic interactions was set to 10 Å. We ran ten different sets of the simulation starting with a different random-number seed. From each trajectory file, coordinates of ATP in every 0.1 ps were retrieved and snapshot structures from the latter 1 ns simulation were used for analyses.

Comparison of ATP structures: torsion angle and ring curvature

Conformations of ATP molecules in protein-bound and free forms were compared by torsion angles of bonds and flatness of ring structures. Torsion angles in ATP were defined as shown in Figure 1. The definition is the same as the ones commonly used in DNA and RNA (see Chapter 5 of Schlick T.13, for instance). A torsion angle of a glycosyl bond (C1′-N9), for example, is defined by O4′, C1′, N9 and C4. The cis position of O4′ and C4 is defined as zero degree and the clockwise rotation of the N9-C4 bond viewed in C1′-N9 direction is defined as a positive rotation.
Figure 1

Definition of the torsion angle for ATP molecule. Each torsion angle is named as shown in the right box. In the box, the torsion angle of the bond by the second and the third atoms is defined by the rotation between the first-second and the third-fourth bonds. cis location of the first and the fourth atoms is defined as zero degree. The order of the atoms also defines the sign of rotation, namely clockwise rotation of the fourth atom against the first atom is defined as a positive rotation. The arrows in the figure depict the positive rotation of the bond.

Flatness of the ring structure of ribose and adenine was calculated using discrete Gaussian curvature (K) and mean curvature (H) descriptions (Fig. 2). The Gaussian curvature at a point on a surface is defined as a product of the maximum and minimum curvatures of a plane embedding the normal vector of the point (the principal curvatures), and the mean curvature is defined as a mean of the principal curvatures. With both curvatures, the degree of flatness and of puckering of a ring structure can be described. Here we employed the definition of the discrete Gaussian and mean curvatures described in references 14 and 15. The discrete Gaussian curvature at the gravity center of a ring can be calculated as; and the discrete mean curvature at the gravity center can be calculated as; In these calculations, A is the area of triangle spanned by atoms i, j and the gravity center of the ring, θ is the angle in radian between the two lines, the line connecting atom i and the gravity center, and the line connecting atom j and the gravity center, δ is the torsion angle in radian between two triangles over the line drawn between atom i and the gravity center, and l is the length of the line drawn between atom i and the gravity center. The subscripts i and j go over all the atoms for the ring14,15. For the curvature calculation of the ribose, namely C1′, C2′, C3′, C4′ and O4′ atoms were used. Curvature calculation for the two ring structures in adenine was done separately. For the curvature calculation of the six-membered ring in the adenine, N1, C2, N3, C4, C5 and C6 atoms were used, and of the five-membered ring, C4, C5, N7, C8, and N9 atoms were used. The relative orientation of the two rings in the adenine was described by the flatness of the pseudo-hexagon consisting of C6, C5, N7, N9, C4 and N3 atoms.
Figure 2

The definition of the discrete Gaussian and mean curvatures at the gravity center.

Intuitively, the discrete Gaussian curvature measures whether the surface is curved or not, whilst the discrete mean curvature measures the degree of the mixture of the concaveness and convexness. In this analysis, the Gaussian curvature at the gravity center of the ring is always negative. The sign of the mean curvature depends on the strength of concaveness and convexness of the ring structure at the gravity center. Flatness and puckering of the ring can be described by both curvatures through concaveness and convexness.

Results and Discussion

Coordinate set of ATP from PDB

The set of proteins with ATP in PDB is shown in Table 1. There were 188 unique protein-ATP complex. The uniqueness was defined by the sequence identity of the proteins. No proteins in the set have sequence identity more than 25% based on the calculation by BLASTClust10. The biological uniqueness of these proteins was checked based on Uni Prot16 ID. UniProt ID is basically built by protein function abbreviation with a species name abbreviation connected by an underscore. None of the entries in Table 1 has the same protein function based on the UniProt ID.
Table 1

Functional classification of ATP-binding proteins

ATP hydrolysis, Pi is released (energy extration reaction)
  Protein NameFamilyPDB IDchainresolUniprot ID

  vacuolar protein sorting-associating protein 4BAAA ATPase family2zanA3.00VPS4B_MOUSE
  N-ethylmaleide sensitive factorAAA ATPase family1nsfA1.90NSF_CRIGR
  FbpC nucleotide-binding domainABC transporter domain3fvqB1.90FBPC_NEIG1
  histidine permeaseABC transporter superfamily1b0uA1.50HISP_SALTY
  maltose/maltodextrin transport ATP-binding protein MalKABC transporter superfamily1q12A2.60MALK_ECOLI
  ATP-binding cassette sub-family B meber 6ABCB family3nh9A2.10ABCB6_HUMAN
  alpha actin 1actin family2fxuA1.35ACTS_RABIT
  actin-related protein 2actin family1tyqB2.55ARP3_BOVIN
  arsenical Pump-driving ATPasearsA ATPase family1ii0B2.40ARSA1_ECOLI
  ATP synthase subunit alphaATPase alpha/beta chains family2r9vA2.10ATPA_THEMA
  v-type ATP synthase beta chainATPase alpha/beta chains family3b2qA2.10VATB_METMA
  biotin carboxylasebiotin carboxylation domain1dv2A2.50ACCC_ECOLI
  sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulumn calcium ATPase 1cation transport ATPase (P-type) family3ar4A2.15AT2A1_RABIT
  GroELchaperonin (HSP60) family1kp8A2.00CH60_ECOLI
  heat shock locus U (HslU)clpX chaperone family1do0A3.00HSLU_ECOLI
  DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1DNA mismatch repair mutL/hexB family3na3A2.50MLH1_HUMAN
  DNA mismatch repair protein MutSDNA mismatch repair mutS family1w7aA2.27MUTS_ECOLI
  PurL, Formylglycinamide ribonucleotide amidotransferaseFGAMS family2hs0A2.52PURL_THEMA
  Gar synthetase (PurD)GARS family2yw2A1.80PUR2_AQUAE
  aspartyl/glutamyl-tRNA amidotransferase subunit BgatB/gatE family3h0rH3.00GATB_AQUAE
  70kDa heat shock cognate proteinheat shock protein 70 family1kaxA1.70HSP7C_BOVIN
  PcrA DNA helicasehelicase family1qhhB2.50PCRA_BACST
  nitrogenase iron protein 1nifH/bchL/chlL family2c8vA2.50NIH1_AZOVI
  cell division inhibitor MinDparA family3q9lA2.34MIND_ECOLI
  bacterial chromosome segregation protein SoJParAB family2bekA1.80Q72H90_THET2
  5-formaminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl 5′-monophosphate synthetasephosphohexose mutase family2r7lA2.10PURP_METJA
  phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxylase ATPase subunitpurK/purT family3ethA1.60PURK_ECOLI
  glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase (purT)purK/purT family1kj9B1.60PURT_ECOLI
  Holliday junction DNA helicase RuvBruvB family1j7kA1.80RUVB_THEMA
  phoshpribosylamidoimidazole-succinocarboxamide synthaseSAICAR synthetase family1obdA1.40PUR7_YEAST
  translocase SecA subunitsecA family2fsgB2.20SECA_ECOLI
  larget T antigen helicase domainSF3 helicase domain1svmC1.94LT_SV40
  Psp operon transcriptional activator (PspF)sigma-54 factor interaction domain2c96A1.80PSPF_ECOLI
  Rad50 ABC-ATPase N-terminal domainSMC family1f2uA1.60RAD50_PYRFU
  sulfiredoxinsulfiredoxin family3cyiA1.80SRXN1_HUMAN
  NTPase P4 (molecular motor)superfamily 4 helicase motif2vhqA2.15Q94M05_9VIRU
  transglutaminase 2Transglutaminase family3ly6A3.14TGM2_HUMAN
  EcoR124I restriction enzyme HSDR subunittypeII restriction enzyme2w00B2.60Q304R3_ECOLX
  UvrABC component UvrBuvrB family1d9zA3.15UVRB_BACCA
  twitching motility protein PilTnot classified2ewwA3.20O66950_AQUAE
  transcriptional regulatory protein ZraRnot classified1ojlE3.00ZRAR_SALTY
  myosin II heavy chainnot classified1fmwA2.15MYS2_DICDI
  dethiobiotin synthetasenot classified1a82A1.80BIOD_ECOLI

ATP hydrolysis, Pi is transferred (phosphprylation)
  Protein NameFamilyPDB IDchainresolUniprot ID

  isocitrate dehydrogenase kinase/phosphatase (AceK)AceK family3epsA2.80ACEK_ECO57
  cAMP-dependent protein kinaseAGC Ser/Thr protein kinase family3fjqE1.60KAPCA_MOUSE
  protein kinase C iota typeAGC Ser/Thr protein kinase family: PKC subfamily3a8wB2.10KPCI_HUMAN
  G protein coupled receptor kinase 1 (crystals of 6 different states)AGC Ser/Thr protein kinsae family: GRK kinase family3c4wB2.70RK_BOVIN
  myosin heavy chain kinase Aalpha-type protein kinase family3lmiB2.20MHCKA_DICDI
  Isopentenyl phosphate kinaseAmino acid kinase family3ll5C1.99Q9HLX1_THEAC
  anti-sigma F factoranti-sigma-factor family1tidA2.50SP2AB_BACST
  ribokinasecarbohydrate kinase pfkB family3ikhA1.88A6T989_KLEP7
  casein kinase-1CK1 Ser/Thr protein kinase family1csnA2.00CKI1_SCHPO
  dephospho-CoA kinasecoaE family1jjvA2.00COAE_HAEIN
  mevalonate kinaseGHMP kinase family1kvkA2.40KIME_RAT
  gluconate kinasegluconokinase gntK/gntV family1ko5A2.28GNTK_ECOLI
  Inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate 3-kinase Binositol phosphokinase (IPK) family2aqxA2.50IP3KB_RAT
  KaiCkaiC family2gblA2.80KAIC_SYNP7
  l-seryl-tRNA kinaseL-seryl-tRNA(Sec) kinase family3am1A2.40PSTK_METJA
  NAD kinaseNAD kinase family1z0sA1.70PPNK_ARCFU
  nucleotide diphosphate kinaseNDK family1wklB2.20NDK_THET8
  pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase isoform 2PDK/BCKDK protein kinase family2bu2A2.40PDK2_HUMAN
  phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinasephosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase family2olrA1.60PPCK_ECOLI
  phosphofruktokinasephosphofructokinase family3o8lA3.20K6PF_RABIT
  phosphoglycerate kinasephosphoglycerate kinase family1vjdA1.90PGK1_PIG
  phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunitPI3/PI4-kinase family1e8xA2.20PK3CG_PIG
  polyhosphate kinasepolyphosphate kinase family1xdpA2.50PPK_ECOLI
  Pantothenate kinaseprokaryotic pantothenate kinase family2zsfA2.80COAA_MYCTU
  cell division protein kinse 2protein kinase superfamily2cchA1.70CDK2_HUMAN
  pyridoxine kinasepyridoxine kinase family2ddoA2.60PDXK_ECOLI
  pyruvate kinasepyruvate kinase family1a49A2.10KPYM_RABIT
  Rio1 serine kinaseRIO-type Ser/Thr kinase family1zp9A2.00RIO1_ARCFU
  Rio2 serine kinaseRIO-type Ser/Thr kinase family1zaoA1.84RIO2_ARCFU
  mitotic checkpoint serine/threonin-protein kinase Bub1Ser/Thr protein kinase family3e7eA2.31BUB1_HUMAN
  SR protein kinaseSer/Thr protein kinase family1q97A2.30SKY1_YEAST
  shikimate kinaseshikimate kinase family2iywA1.85AROK_MYCTU
  Tao2 kinase domainSTE20 subfamily1u5rA2.10TAOK2_RAT
  thymidylate kinasethymidylate kinase family1e2qA1.70KTHY_HUMAN
  thiazole kinaseThz kinase family1esqC2.50THIM_BACSU
  MET receptor tyrosine kinaseTyr protein kinase family3dkcA1.52A1L467_HUMAN
  phosphofruktokinasenot classified3f5mB2.70O15648_9TRYP
  D-alanine-D-alanine ligasenot classified2zdqA2.30Q5SHZ3_THET8
  chloramphenicol phosphotransferasenot classified1qhxA2.50CPT_STRVL
  aminoglycoside phosphotransferasenot classified3havB2.45Q9EVD7_ENTFC
  Thiamine monophosphate kinasenot classified3c9rA2.30O67883_AQUAE
  UMP kinasenot classified2jjxA2.82Q81S73_BACAN

ATP hydrolysis, PPi is released (energy extration reaction)
  Protein NameFamilyPDB IDchainresolUniprot ID

  adenylate cyclase type 5adenylyl cyclase class-4/guanylyl cyclase family3c16A2.87ADCY5_CANFA
  argininosuccinate synthetaseargininosuccinate synthase family1kp3A2.00ASSY_ECOLI
  beta-lactam synthetaseasparagine synthetase family1mb9B2.11BLS_STRCL
  Acyl-coenzyme A synthetase Acsm2AATP-dependent AMP-binding enzyme3c5eA1.60ACS2A_HUMAN
  D-alanine-polyphosphoribitol ligase subunit 1ATP-dependent AMP-binding enzyme family3fceA1.90DLTA_BACCR
  DNA ligase from bacteriophage T7ATP-dependent DNA ligase family1a0iA2.60DNLI_BPT7
  tryptophan-tRNA synthetaseclass-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase familiy1mauA2.15SYW_BACST
  glutamyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase familiy1j09A1.80SYE_THET8
  glutaminyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family1gtrA2.50SYQ_ECOLI
  tyrosine-tRNA synthetaseclass-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family1h3eA2.90SYY_THETH
  tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family2quiA2.40SYWC_HUMAN
  histidyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase familiy1kmnC2.80SYH_ECOLI
  prolyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family2i4oA2.40SYP_RHOPA
  Class II AARS homologue (bll0957)class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family3meyA2.50Q89VT8_BRAJA
  Lysyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family3bjuA2.31SYK_HUMAN
  glycyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family2zt7A2.70SYG_HUMAN
  pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family2q7gA1.90PYLS_METMA
  aspartyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family3nemB1.89SYD_PYRKO
  Threonyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family1nyrA2.80SYT_STAAW
  alanyl-tRNA synthetaseclass-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family1yfrA2.15SYA_AQUAE
  serryl-tRNA synthetaseclass-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family3lssB1.95Q384V4_9TRYP
  tRNA-lysidine synthasetRNA(Ile)-lysidine synthase family2e89A2.50TILS_AQUAE
  prolyl-tRNA synthetasenot classified2j3mB2.30Q831W7_ENTFA
  serryl-tRNA synthetasenot classified2cjaB2.20Q46AN5_METBA
  NH3-dependent NAD+ synthetaseNAD synthetase family1xngB1.70NADE_HELPY
  bacteriophage phi 6 RNA dependent RNA polymerasePolymerase family1hi1A3.00RDRP_BPPH6
  tRNA CCA-pyrophosphorylasetRNA nucleotidyltransferase/poly(A) polymerase family3h39B2.85Q9WZH4_THEMA
  polyA polymerasetRNA nucleotidyltransferase/poly(A) polymerase family3aqnA3.30C9QS13_ECOD1
  RNA editing ligase Mp52not classified1xdnA1.20RLGM1_TRYBB

ATP hydrolysis, PPi is released and AMP is transferred (adenylation)
  Protein NameFamilyPDB IDchainresolUniprot ID

  nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) adenylyltransferasearchaeal NMN adenylyltransferase family1f9aA2.00NADM_METJA
  phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferasebacterial coaD family1gn8A1.83COAD_ECOLI
  glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase smallbacterial/plant glucose-1-phosphate1yp3C2.60GLGS_SOLTU
  subunitadenylyltransferase family
  DNA polymerase IVDNA polymerase type-Y family3m9oB2.00DPO42_SULSO
  adenylyltransferase ThiFhesA/moeB/thiF family1zfnA2.75THIF_ECOLI
  lipoate-protein ligase AlplA family2aruA2.50LPLA_THEAC
  nicotinate-nucleotide adenylyltransferasenadD family1yunA2.00NADD_PSEAE
  pantoate-beta-alanine ligasepantothenate synthetase family2a84A1.55PANC_MYCTU
  polyA polymerasepoly(A) polymerase family2q66A1.80PAP_YEAST
  tRNA CCA-pyrophosphrylasetRNA nucleotidyltransferase/poly(A) polymerase family3ovbA1.95CCA_ARCFU
  ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1C (Uba3)ubiquitin-activating E1 family1r4nB3.60UBA3_HUMAN
  ubiquitin-like 2 activating enzyme E1Bubiquitin-activating E1 family1y8qD2.25ULE1B_HUMAN
  ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 5ubiquitin-activating E1 family3h8vA2.00UBA5_HUMAN
  biotin protien ligasenot classified2dtoA1.50O57883_PYRHO
  FMN adenylyltransferasenot classified3g59A1.87Q6FNA9_CANGA

ATP hydrolysis, PPPi is relased and adenosine is transferred (adenosylation)
  Protein NameFamilyPDB IDchainresolUniprot ID

  methionine adenosyltransferaseAdoMet synthse family1o9tA2.90METK1_RAT
  CoB(I)alamin adenosyltransferaseCob(I)alamin adenosyltransferase family1g5tA1.80BTUR_SALTY
  CoB(I)yrinic acid A,C-diamide adenosyltransferaseCob(I)alamin adenosyltransferase family2idxA2.50MMAB_HUMAN

Others
  Protein NameFamilyPDB IDchainresolUniprot ID

  7,8-dihydro-6-hydroxymethylpterin-pyrophosphokinaseHPPK family1dy3A2.00HPPK_ECOLI
  Preneck appendage proteinnot classified3gqnA2.15B3VMP8_BPPH2
  ATPsynthase epsilon subunitATPase epsilon chain family2e5yA1.92ATPE_BACP3
  Eukaryotic peptide chain release factor subunit 1eukaryotic release factor 1 family3e1yA3.80ERF1_HUMAN
  prabable ATP-dependent RNA helicase Ddx58helicase family3lrrA2.15DDX58_HUMAN
  NAD-dependent malic enzymemalic enzymes family1gz4A2.20MAOM_HUMAN
  DCP2 proteinNudix hydrolase family2qkmB2.80DCP2_SCHPO
  acetylglutamate kinase-like proteinP(II) protein family2rd5D2.51GLNB_ARATH
  STRADalphaSTE Ser/Thr protein kinase family3gniB2.35STRAA_HUMAN
  redox-sensing transcriptional repressor Rextranscriptional regulatory rex family2vt3B2.00REX_BACSU
  transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1transient receptor2pnnA2.70TRPV1_RAT
  polyhedrinnot classified2oh5A1.98O10693_CPVBM
  pertussis toxin subunit 4not classified1bcpE2.70TOX4_BORPE
  non-biological proteinnot classified2p09A1.65
  5′-AMP-activated protein kinase catalytic subunit alpha-15′-AMP-activated protein kinase gamma subunit family2v92E2.40AAKG1_RAT
  apoptosis regulator Ced4AAA+ family/CARD domain/NB-ARC domain2a5yB2.60CED4_CAEEL
  Clp1(inactive form)Clp1 family2npiA2.95CLP1_YEAST
  Rck dmain of YuaA proteinktrA potassium transport (TC 2.A.38.4) family2hmuA2.25KTRA_BACSU
  nitrogen regulatory protein P-IIP(II) protein family2xbpA1.20GLNB_SYNE7
  O-sialoglycoprotien endopeptidase (probably miss annotation, in reality, AP endonuclease)peptidase M22 family2ivpA2.50GCP_PYRAB
  Rat synapsin Isynapsin family1pk8A2.10SYN1_RAT
  putative uncharacterized protein TTHA0350not classified3ab8A1.70Q5SLE3_THET8
  phosphofruktokinasenot classified3opyB3.05Q8TGA0_PICPA
  chloride channel protein 5 (clc-5)chloride channel family2j9lC2.30CLCN5_HUMAN
  gluconate kinaseFGGY kinase family3ll3A2.00Q5FM28_LACAC
  Hypothetical protein YfbGfmt family/ sugar epimerase familiy1z7eD3.00ARNA_ECOLI
  ATP-dependent molecular chaperone Hsp82heat shock protein 90 family2cg9B3.10HSP82_YEAST
  DNA packaging protein Gp17myoviridae large terminase family2o0hA1.88TERL_BPT4
  AP4a hydrolaseNudix hydrolase family2pq1A1.95O66548_AQUAE
  aspartate carbamoyltransferase regulatory chain (PyrI)PyrI family2ywwB2.00PYRI_METJA
  ribonucleotide reductase R1ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase large chain family3r1rA3.00RIR1_ECOLI
  SMC proteinSMC family1xexA2.50SMC_METJA
  molybdenum storage protein subunit alphaUMP kinase family2ogxA1.60MOSA_AZOVD
  uncharacterized proteinuniversal stress protein A family3cisG2.90O06189_MYCTU
  Actin-depolymerizing factor Brevinvillin/gelsolin family2fghA2.80GELS_HORSE
  ethanolamine utilization protein EutJnot classified3h1qA2.80
  universal stress protein Fnot classified3fdxA1.58A6T8F5_KLEP7
  alcaligin biosynthesis proteinnot classified2x0qA1.96P94255_BORBR
  l-proline dehydrogenase alpha subunitnot classified1y56A2.86O59088_PYRHO
  FtsAnot classified1e4gT2.60Q9WZU0_THEMA
  NTRC-like two-domain proteinnot classified3fkqA2.10
  hemerythrin-like domain protein DcrHnot classified3a8tA2.37Q9REU3_DESVU
  Protein Mj1225not classified3lfzA2.20Y1225_METJA
  pyridoxal kinasenot classified3ibqA2.00Q88YB5_LACPL
  ATP:CoB(I)alamin adenosyltransferasenot classified2zhzA1.80Q2SZ09_BURTA
  clbalamin adenosyltransferase PduO-like proteinnot classified3gahA1.17Q50EJ2_LACRE
  putative ribokinase IInot classified3iq0B1.79Q8FD38_ECOL6
  Universal stress protein familynot classified2z08A1.55Q5SJV7_THET8
  phosphofruktokinasenot classified3ie7A1.60Q929S5_LISIN
  achromobactin synthetase protein D (ACSD)not classified2x3jA2.00Q93AT8_ERWCH
  MccBnot classified3h5nA1.90Q47506_ECOLX
  HipAnot classified3dntB1.66HIPA_ECOLI
  pyruvate carboxylasenot classified3bg5A2.80Q99UY8_STAAM
  probable ATP-dependent DNA ligase Dnot classified2faqA1.90Q9I1X7_PSEAE
  ParA ATPasenot classified3ea0B2.20Q8KF94_CHLTE
  small nucleolar RNP similar to Gar1not classified2hvyB2.30Q8U029_PYRFU
We checked through the literatures of all these data for the biological function of ATP molecules and tabulated them based on the function. We found that 43 were for energy extraction through Pi hydrolysis, 42 for phosphorylation, 29 for energy extraction through PPi hydrolysis, 15 for adenylation, 3 for adenosylation and the remaining 56 were miscellaneous or function unknown (Table 1).

Molecular dynamics simulation of ATP in solvent

One of the results for 2 ns ATP simulations is shown in Figure 3. For the first 200 ps, the structure of ATP molecule seemed to oscillate amongst a limited number of conformations, but after that the molecule assumed many types of conformations. The behaviour in detail was different in different runs of simulation (Supplementary Figs. 1A–I), but the overall tendency and the scale of fluctuation were quite similar. For the analyses hereafter, we used all the conformations obtained in the latter 1 ns of ten runs, namely 100,000 samples of the conformations.
Figure 3

Root mean square deviation (RMSD) of ATP during the simulation. The calculation was done between the initial structure and structures of every 0.1 ps. All 36 atoms including hydrogen atoms were used in the calculation. Four snap shot structures were drawn in the graph. From left to right, conformations of 0 ps, 1,437 ps, 1,513 ps and 1,899 ps. This graph and the following ones were drawn by R21 except Figure 9.

Sufficiency of conformation sampling in this set of simulations is important in the following analyses. Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure 1 showed that, after 1 ns of simulation, ATP molecule underwent a compact and an extended conformations for a couple of times. These back-and-forth trajectories suggest that ATP molecule assumed quite a number of different conformations. In the following analyses, the analysis applied on conformations from each trajectory and the one applied to all as a whole did not show significant differences with a minor exception. This behaviour of the data suggests that the reasonable number of conformations was obtained in the ten runs of 2 ns simulation.

Comparison of ribose conformations

Curvature of ribose in ATP had different distributions between the one calculated from the snapshot conformation in MD simulation and the one from PDB data (Fig. 4). The Gaussian curvature of the ribose from MD simulation had normal-like distribution around −0.11 and the mean curvature had normal-like distribution around 0.02. This behaviour was almost the same in each trajectory of ten runs (Supplementary Fig. 2). The distribution of the mean curvature of the ribose from PDB was more or less the same as the distribution from MD simulation, but the distribution of the Gaussian curvature of the ribose from PDB was not in the normal form and about 70% of them lay between −0.10 and −0.05. The value of the Gaussian curvature is always negative by definition, and when the value is close to zero, the ring structure is close to a flat structure. Therefore, the comparison of the structures above suggests that the ribose in ATP is off the plane when it exists in water, but is restricted to relatively planar structure when bound to a protein. This difference is not that obvious when the structures are compared in torsion angles of the ribose ring.
Figure 4

Ribose curvature in the conformations from molecular dynamics simulation and from PDB. A black dot is obtained from the snap shot conformation form the molecular dynamics simulation, and a red dot is from PDB. The histogram in black clarifies the distribution of black dots, and the one in red clarifies the distribution of red dots. The ribose with minimum/maximum curvature values in the snap shot conformations from the molecular dynamics simulation were drawn on the histograms.

The torsion angles τ0 and τ4 can be good indicators of puckering structure of ribose ring. As shown in Figure 5, a cluster of structures at the first quadrant (τ0>0 and τ4>0) is C2′ exo conformation, the second quadrant (τ0<0 and τ4>0) is O4′ endo conformation, the third quadrant (τ0<0 and τ4<0) is basically C2′ endo conformation, and the fourth quadrant (τ0>0 and τ4<0) is O4′ exo conformation. In water, C2′ exo and C2′ endo conformations was highly dominated followed by O4′ endo conformation. When the distribution in different ten runs of simulation was examined (Supplementary Fig. 3), four runs (trajectories 01, 03, 06, 07) had more numbers of C2′ exo conformations and two runs (trajectories 05, 09) had more numbers of C2′ endo conformations. As a whole, there is a tendency to prefer both C2′ exo and C2′ endo conformations in water. When ATP bound to protein, the number of C2′ exo and C2′ endo conformations were more or less the same and O4′ endo conformation was less populated.
Figure 5

Ribose torsion angles τ0 and τ4 in the conformations from molecular dynamics simulation and from PDB. A black dot is obtained from the conformation of molecular dynamics simulation, and a red dot is from PDB. The histogram in black clarifies the distribution of black dots, and the one in red clarifies the distribution of red dots.

The difference in puckering seemingly has a connection to the biological role of ATP molecules. Out of 188 protein-bound ATP molecules in the dataset, 43 ATP molecules were for energy extraction through Pi hydrolysis, and 42 ATP molecules were for phosphorylation (Table 1). About 50% of 43 plus 42 ATP molecules took either C2′ exo or C2′ endo conformation. Interestingly, 33% of ATP molecules in energy extraction group (the maximum portion in the group) took C2′ endo conformation, and 33% of ATP molecules in phosphorylation group (the maximum portion in the group) took C2′ exo conformation.

Comparison of adenine conformation

We analyzed the conformation of adenine in two separate rings, namely five-membered ring and six-membered ring. The five-membered ring had a flat conformation during the MD simulation with an occasional slight deviation (Fig. 6). The distribution of the black dots in the figure, which forms an eastbound comet shape in any runs of simulation (Supplementary Fig. 4), suggests that the five-membered ring in adenine should undergo puckering in a very slight scale. The five-membered rings of adenine in the ATP molecules in PDB took a very flat conformation as visualized in the figure by red dots. Almost all the dots were found at the head of the comet shape, where both Gaussian and mean curvatures were very close to zero.
Figure 6

Adenine five-membered ring curvature in the conformations from the molecular dynamics simulation and from PDB. A black dot is obtained from the conformation of the molecular dynamics simulation, and a red dot is from PDB. The histogram in black clarifies the distribution of black dots, and the one in red clarifies the distribution of red dots. The adenine five-membered rings with minimum/maximum curvature values in the snap shot conformations from the molecular dynamics simulation were drawn on the histograms. A chemical bond at the bottom of each figure is a glycosyl bond and six-membered ring is located at the far side.

The conformation of six-membered ring in adenine had different characteristics compared with the five-membered ring. In the conformation obtained by the MD simulation, the distribution of the Gaussian curvature was significantly different from that for the five-membered ring (Fig. 7). In the Gaussian curvature, the absolute value of the center of the distribution was significantly greater, and the width of the distribution was significantly wider than those of five-membered ring. The magnitude of distribution in the mean curvature was also greater than that of five-membered ring. These differences evidently appeared in any runs of the simulations (Supplementary Fig. 5). All of these facts indicate that the six-membered ring in solution was deviated from a flat structure in a greater scale compared with the five-membered ring. These deviations from flatness were, however, considerably adjusted when ATP molecule bound to a protein. The distribution of Gaussian curvature of six-membered ring in PDB protruded out to the east direction from the distribution of the Gaussian curvature and squeezed to the center of the mean curvature of ATP in water (red dots in Fig. 7). The six-membered ring of adenine was apparently flattened by the protein, to the extent of the flatness that rarely appeared in ATP in water.
Figure 7

Adenine six-membered ring curvature in the conformations from the molecular dynamics simulation and from PDB. A black dot is obtained from the conformation of the molecular dynamics simulation, and a red dot is from PDB. The histogram in black clarifies the distribution of black dots, and the one in red clarifies the distribution of red dots. The adenine six-membered rings with minimum/maximum curvature values in the snap shot conformations from the molecular dynamics simulation were drawn on the histograms except for the conformation on the far right side which is derived from PDB structure (PDB ID: 2J9L). A chemical bond at the bottom of each figure is a glycosyl bond and five-membered ring is located at the far side.

Adenine structure can be approximated to two flat rings that oscillate at the connection and the oscillation motion can be observed in the MD simulation. We described the oscillation motion by defining a pseudo-ring across the two rings and calculated Gaussian and mean curvatures (Fig. 8). In the conformation obtained from the MD simulation, both Gaussian and mean curvatures had normal-like distribution and a crescent-shape distribution when combined; two edges of the crescent consisted of the conformations in the long tail of the Gaussian curvature. These distributions were observed in trajectories of ten runs (Supplementary Fig. 6). In the conformations from PDB, however, the values of the mean curvature were virtually zero and the values of the Gaussian curvature distributed around two peaks, namely the peaks at −0.75 and at −0.68. The former conformations mostly lay within the distribution of ATP in solution, but the latter conformations lay out of the range of the distribution of ATP in solution. The distribution of Gaussian curvature in PDB had no clear correlation to other values such as buriedness of ATP molecule to the protein or the function of ATP molecules, and hence the physicochemical explanation for this distinction needs further study. It seems that, due to some structural constraints, the conformation with Gaussian curvature −0.70 is prohibited in the adenine ring.
Figure 8

Adenine hinge motion. The hinge motion is defined by the open-book movement in five-membered and six-membered rings in the adenine molecule. A pseudo-ring was defined to assess the openness of the hinge. See the method section for the detail. A black dot is obtained from the conformation of the molecular dynamics simulation, and a red dot is from PDB. The histogram in black clarifies the distribution of black dots and the one in red clarifies the distribution of red dots. The hinge conformations with minimum/maximum curvature values in the molecular dynamics simulation were drawn. A chemical bond at the bottom of each figure is a glycosyl bond and six-membered ring is located at the far side.

Different distributions of torsion angles between the conformations of MD simulation and of PDB

The torsion around the chemical bond between the phosphate unit and the ribose (γ), and that around the glycosyl bond connecting the ribose and adenine (χ) are apparently far more flexible than the torsion angles around the bonds for ribose and adenine rings in ATP molecule (Fig. 1). However, the torsion angles around these bonds in conformations from MD simulation were heavily populated at only two states. When the conformations were counted with the bins of torsion angles digitized by 10 degrees, the densely populated bins were represented by a pair of torsion angles γ=−170 and χ=70, and by a pair of γ=−60 and χ=60. Both conformations were found around 1.0% of the whole population (Fig. 9). Different trajectories had peak population in different torsion angle pairs (Supplementary Fig. 7), but the two peaks in Figure 9 were almost consistently appeared as one of the top peaks in all trajectories. The noticeable exceptions were trajectories 5 and 6. Both trajectories did have a peak at γ=−60 and χ=60, but did not have a peak at γ=−170 and χ=70. The torsion angles γ=−90 to −180 represents a trans conformation between O5′ and C3′. The torsion angle χ=60 represents a gauche+ or syn conformation between the ribose and the adenine. Obviously the ATP molecule assumes a compact conformation by syn conformer in water.
Figure 9

Probability density function map of the torsion angles &gamma and χ. The left map is derived from the snap shot conformations of the molecular dynamics simulation, and the right map is from the conformations in PDB. The probability is depicted in rainbow colour scheme from blue to red in ascending order as shown in the colour bars. Note that the dynamic range of the two maps is different. One of the structures in highly populated torsion angles is shown on the top.

Peaks in a pair of torsion angles were found in different values in the conformations from PDB. The most heavily populated pair of angles was γ=50, χ=−150 (3.4%), followed by γ=50, χ=−160 (2.9%) and γ=40, χ=−120 (2.9%) (Fig. 9). The torsion angle γ=50 represents a cis conformation between O5′ and C3′.χ=−120 to −160 represents an anti conformation between the ribose and the adenine. When bound to a protein, the ATP molecule is extended over the protein. In the population derived from MD simulation, the proportion of the conformations abundant in PDB was approximately half of the most populated conformation. Both the conformations with γ=50 and χ=−150 and the conformations with γ=50 and χ=−160 occupied about 0.4%, and the conformations with γ=40 and χ=−120 about 0.2%. In trajectory 6 in ten runs of simulations, 1% of the population was found in a pair of torsion angles close to the conformations found in PDB. This is, however, the only run with the dense population and none of the nine others had the dense population at the corresponding torsion angle pairs. On the other hand, in the population of PDB, the proportion of the conformations abundant in MD simulation was virtually none. These results strongly suggest that during the process of ATP binding to protein, the protein should exert forces on ATP molecule to assume the specific conformation that were under-represented in solution. As mentioned above, there were three sets of torsion angles in ATP molecules that often appeared in PDB. These three sets were virtually grouped into two, namely, a pair of 50≤γ<60 and −160<χ≤−140, and a pair of 40≤γ<50 and −120<χ ≤−110 (Fig. 9). When we examined the function of ATP molecules in both peaks, we found that the proteins in the former peak had ATP for phosphorylation function twice as many as those in the latter peak (the second group in Table 1). Mildvan discussed in his review17 and his works with the coworkers, that the former peak of χ angle (they called low-antiglycosyl torsional angle) was found in ATP-Mn2+ binary complex and represented presumably an inactive form, and that the latter peak of χ angle (they called high-antiglycosyl torsional angle) was found in ATP-Mn2+-kinase ternary complex and presumably represented an active form. Combined with the current analyses, we suggest that the former peak (50≤γ<60 and −160<χ≤−140) is the set of torsion angles for inactive form and may be easily crystalized. And the latter (40≤γ<50 and −120<χ≤−110) peak is the torsion angles for active form and may be difficult for crystalization, because the conformation initiates chemical reactions. This may explain the difference in the density of population in two peaks. The over-representation of ATP molecules for phosphorylation in the former peaks can be explained by the possibility that they were much easily crystalized in the inactive form.

Conclusion

In this paper, we extensively analyzed the effect of protein to ATP conformations. It has been implicitly assumed that protein affects on ATP conformation when it binds, but there were no comprehensive study on this issue. Based on the sampling of the ATP solution structures obtained from MD simulation, and the sampling of ATP structures bound to a protein in Protein Data Bank, the following three characteristics were found. The ribose ring in ATP molecule, which is flexible in solution, tends to assume C2′ exo or C2′ endo conformation when it binds to protein. Proteins that use ATP for energy source tend to bind ATP with C2′ endo forms. Proteins that use ATP for phosphorylation tend to bind ATP with C2′ exo forms. The adenine ring in ATP molecule, which assumes open-book motion with the two ring structures, has two distinct structures when ATP binds to protein. One of the structures is commonly found in solution but the other not. The physicochemical background of this distinction needs further study. The torsion angles of glycosyl bond (χ) and the bond between phosphate unit and the ribose (γ) take unique values when ATP binds to protein. The combination of the torsion angles well populated in solution rarely found in the ATP molecule on the protein. There are two well-populated torsion angles in ATP bound to proteins, one of which may represent active form and the other inactive form. These findings suggest that ATP-binding protein forces ATP to take rare conformation in solution when ATP binds to protein, and that this conformational change exerted by the protein should be the trigger for the cleavage of the γ phosphate group. Finding a conformation of the bound ligand is a big issue in protein-ligand docking problem18,19,20. The widely used methods introduced MD to search for the conformation of the ligand placed close to the protein. The current study implies that, in the case of ATP molecule, protein bound conformation can hardly be achieved by simple MD simulation, as shown that flatness of the ring structures and the χ and γ torsion angles for protein-bound ATP rarely appears in solution. Therefore, a sophisticated MD simulation that includes both a ligand and a protein at once is, at least, necessary to sample the conformations for protein-ligand complex. In addition, the failure in finding the appropriate conformation in MD simulation can be circumvented by a database search (database sampling), in case the protein-ligand conformations are abundant in the database.
  17 in total

1.  Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  Helen Berman; Kim Henrick; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-12

2.  Some considerations on the energetics of bacterial growth.

Authors:  J C SENEZ
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1962-06

3.  Het-PDB Navi.: a database for protein-small molecule interactions.

Authors:  Akihiro Yamaguchi; Kei Iida; Nobuaki Matsui; Shirou Tomoda; Kei Yura; Mitiko Go
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.387

4.  Ab initio prediction of protein-ligand binding structures by replica-exchange umbrella sampling simulations.

Authors:  Hironori Kokubo; Toshimasa Tanaka; Yuko Okamoto
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Three-dimensional structure of ATP:corrinoid adenosyltransferase from Salmonella typhimurium in its free state, complexed with MgATP, or complexed with hydroxycobalamin and MgATP.

Authors:  C B Bauer; M V Fonseca; H M Holden; J B Thoden; T B Thompson; J C Escalante-Semerena; I Rayment
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Structure of D-alanine-D-alanine ligase from Thermus thermophilus HB8: cumulative conformational change and enzyme-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Kitamura; Akio Ebihara; Yoshihiro Agari; Akeo Shinkai; Ken Hirotsu; Seiki Kuramitsu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-09-16

Review 7.  The chemical biology of protein phosphorylation.

Authors:  Mary Katherine Tarrant; Philip A Cole
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 8.  Advances and challenges in protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Ubiquitin-like protein activation by E1 enzymes: the apex for downstream signalling pathways.

Authors:  Brenda A Schulman; J Wade Harper
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 94.444

View more
  6 in total

1.  A Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Urzyme: Authenticity of tRNA Synthetase Catalytic Activities and Promiscuous Phosphorylation of Leucyl-5'AMP.

Authors:  Jessica J Hobson; Zhijie Li; Hao Hu; Charles W Carter
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Molecular dynamics free energy simulations of ATP:Mg2+ and ADP:Mg2+ using the polarizable force field AMOEBA.

Authors:  Brandon Walker; Zhifeng Jing; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  Mol Simul       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.178

3.  Case study on the evolution of hetero-oligomer interfaces based on the differences in paralogous proteins.

Authors:  Saki Aoto; Kei Yura
Journal:  Biophys Physicobiol       Date:  2015-12-02

4.  Conformational shift in the closed state of GroEL induced by ATP-binding triggers a transition to the open state.

Authors:  Yuka Suzuki; Kei Yura
Journal:  Biophys Physicobiol       Date:  2016-07-14

5.  Genome Segregation by the Venus Flytrap Mechanism: Probing the Interaction Between the ParF ATPase and the ParG Centromere Binding Protein.

Authors:  Marisa Caccamo; Aneta Dobruk-Serkowska; Fernando Rodríguez-Castañeda; Cecilia Pennica; Daniela Barillà; Finbarr Hayes
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-06-16

6.  Multiple conformations facilitate PilT function in the type IV pilus.

Authors:  Matthew McCallum; Samir Benlekbir; Sheryl Nguyen; Stephanie Tammam; John L Rubinstein; Lori L Burrows; P Lynne Howell
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.