Literature DB >> 27492972

Twenty-Year Outcome of a Longitudinal Prospective Evaluation of Isolated Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon or Hamstring Autograft.

Simon Michael Thompson1, Lucy J Salmon2, Alison Waller1, James Linklater3, Justin P Roe1, Leo A Pinczewski1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term prospective studies of isolated endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are limited and may include confounding factors.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of isolated ACL reconstruction using the patellar tendon (PT) autograft and the hamstring (HT) autograft in 180 patients over 20 years. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: A total of 180 participants undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction between 1993 and 1994 were prospectively recruited. Evaluation was performed at 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 years after surgery and included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee ligament evaluation with radiographic evaluation, KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, and subjective scores.
RESULTS: Over 20 years, there were 16 patients (18%) and 9 patients (10%) with an ACL graft rupture in the HT and PT groups, respectively (P = .13). ACL graft rupture was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.9; P = .007), nonideal tunnel position (OR, 3.6; P = .019), and age <18 years at the time of surgery (OR, 4.6; P = .003). The odds of a contralateral ACL rupture were increased in patients with the PT graft compared with patients with the HT graft (OR, 2.2; P = .02) and those aged <18 years at the time of surgery (OR, 3.4; P = .001). The mean IKDC scores at 20-year follow-up were 86 and 89 for the PT and HT groups, respectively (P = .18). At 20 years, 53% and 57% of the PT and HT groups participated in strenuous or very strenuous activities (P = .55), kneeling pain was present in 63% and 20% of the PT and HT groups (P = .018), and radiographic osteoarthritic change was found in 61% and 41% of the PT and HT groups (P = .008), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Compared with patients who received the HT graft, patients who received the PT graft had significantly worse outcomes with regard to radiologically detectable osteoarthritis, kneeling pain, and contralateral ACL injury. At 20-year follow-up, both HT and PT autografts continued to provide good subjective outcomes and objective stability. However, further ACL injury is common, particularly in male individuals, younger patients, and those with tunnel malposition.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; knee; long-term outcome; reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27492972     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516658041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  32 in total

1.  Bone-to-bone integrations were complete within 5 months after anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Hironari Masuda; Shuji Taketomi; Hiroshi Inui; Naoya Shimazaki; Nobuhiro Nishihara; Seikai Toyooka; Hirotaka Kawano; Takumi Nakagawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Patient satisfaction with health is substantially improved following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Philipp Minzlaff; Thomas Heidt; Matthias J Feucht; Johannes E Plath; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Andreas B Imhoff; Tim Saier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Degenerative changes in cartilage likely occur in the medial compartment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Tetsuro Ushio; Ken Okazaki; Kanji Osaki; Yukihisa Takayama; Koji Sagiyama; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukio Akasaki; Hiroshi Honda; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.

Authors:  Brian T Samuelsen; Kate E Webster; Nick R Johnson; Timothy E Hewett; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Ian D Engler; Ehab M Nazzal; Jonathan F Dalton; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Jonathan D Hughes; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Della Villa; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Surgeon's experience, sports participation and a concomitant MCL injury increase the use of patellar and quadriceps tendon grafts in primary ACL reconstruction: a nationwide registry study of 39,964 surgeries.

Authors:  Dzan Rizvanovic; Markus Waldén; Magnus Forssblad; Anders Stålman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.114

7.  INFLUENCE OF PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS AND GRAFT TYPES ON ACL SECOND INJURY RATES IN IPSILATERAL VERSUS CONTRALATERAL KNEES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Zakariya Nawasreh; Gabrielle Adams; Olivia Pryzbylkowski; David Logerstedt
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

8.  One in 5 Athletes Sustain Reinjury Upon Return to High-Risk Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review in 1239 Athletes Younger Than 20 Years.

Authors:  Sue Barber-Westin; Frank R Noyes
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Risk Factors for Contra-Lateral Secondary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Cronström; Eva Tengman; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Anterior Half of the Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft.

Authors:  Mingguang Bi; Chen Zhao; Qiong Zhang; Li Cao; Xinji Chen; Mingxiang Kong; Qing Bi
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.