| Literature DB >> 27492282 |
Sajjad Hussain1,2, Jai Singh3, Dhanasekaran Vikraman4, Arun Kumar Singh5, Muhammad Zahir Iqbal5, Muhammad Farooq Khan5, Pushpendra Kumar6, Dong-Chul Choi1,2, Wooseok Song7, Ki-Seok An7, Jonghwa Eom5, Wan-Gyu Lee8, Jongwan Jung1,2.
Abstract
We report a simple and mass-scalable approach for thin MoS2 films via RF sputtering combined with the post-deposition annealing process. We have prepared as-sputtered film using a MoS2 target in the sputtering system. The as-sputtered film was subjected to post-deposition annealing to improve crystalline quality at 700 °C in a sulfur and argon environment. The analysis confirmed the growth of continuous bilayer to few-layer MoS2 film. The mobility value of ~29 cm(2)/Vs and current on/off ratio on the order of ~10(4) were obtained for bilayer MoS2. The mobility increased up to ~173-181 cm(2)/Vs, respectively, for few-layer MoS2. The mobility of our bilayer MoS2 FETs is larger than any previously reported values of single to bilayer MoS2 grown on SiO2/Si substrate with a SiO2 gate oxide. Moreover, our few-layer MoS2 FETs exhibited the highest mobility value ever reported for any MoS2 FETs with a SiO2 gate oxide. It is presumed that the high mobility behavior of our film could be attributed to low charged impurities of our film and dielectric screening effect by an interfacial MoOxSiy layer. The combined preparation route of RF sputtering and post-deposition annealing process opens up the novel possibility of mass and batch production of MoS2 film.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27492282 PMCID: PMC4974610 DOI: 10.1038/srep30791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic representation of the experimental set-up. The RF sputtering technique was used to prepare as-sputtered MoS2 layer. Post-deposition annealing treatment was performed to further enhance crystalline quality in as-sputtered MoS2 under Ar and sulfur environment. Optical images of MoS2 films grown on SiO2/Si substrate. (b) MoS2 sputtered for 1 min; (c) MoS2 sputtered for 3 min; and (d) MoS2 sputtered for 5 min.
Figure 2(a–c) Raman spectra of as-sputtered and annealed MoS2 films; (d) Raman spectra of MoS2 films annealed at different times of 30 min, 1 hour, 2 hours and 3 hours; (e) Magnified view of Raman spectra of figure (d); (f–h) Raman mapping for 1-min sample (30 μm × 30 μm). (f) E2g1 mode appears at 384.82–384.92 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.048 cm−1) (g) A1g mode appears at 405.19–405.29 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.049 cm−1) (h) The measured frequencies difference (∆k) is in the range of 20.27–20.47 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.066 cm−1).
Figure 3XPS spectra of MoS2 films annealed at 700 °C.
Mo and S atoms binding energy spectra for different sputter time: (a,b) 1 min, (c,d) 3 min, and (e,f) 5 min.
Figure 4XPS Depth profile of few-layer MoS2 (5 min-sample).
(a) Mo 3d core peaks as a function of etching time. Binding energies at 229.1 and 232.2 eV are associated with Mo4+ 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 core levels in MoS2, respectively, while S 2s appears at 226.3 eV. The peak at 235.9 eV indicates the presence of Mo6+ (MoO3) on the surface of the film. (b) Sulfur related S2− peak change with etching time. The sulfur related peaks are eventually disappeared after 50~60 sec. (c,d) O 1s and S 2p peak depth profile with the etching time.
Figure 5(a) HAADF image for few-layer MoS2 film (5min-sample) (b) EELS spectra evaluated at different depth positions of film which is labelled as 1,2,3,4 and 5 (c) HRTEM and (d) STEM-HAADF image.
Figure 6(a–c) AFM height profiles of annealed MoS2 films sputtered at 1, 3, and 5 min. Inset figure: 2D cross sectional images of the corresponding annealed MoS2 films; (d–f) Topographical images of annealed MoS2 films sputtered at 1, 3, and 5 min.
Figure 7HRTEM images of 1 min-sample. (a,b) Low-magnification TEM image; (c) Moiré pattern of a bilayer-MoS2 area; (d) Fast Fourier transformation (FFT) image corresponding to the TEM image (c) supporting a bilayer MoS2 film; (e,f) Inverse FFT images of (d) showing the two layers are not Bernal-stacked, but rotated by ~26o; (g) Moiré pattern of a region in which two layers are stacked in a low rotation angle; (h) FFT image corresponding to the TEM image (g); (i–k) FE-SEM images of annealed MoS2 films sputtered at 1, 3, and 5 min.
Figure 8(a) Id–Vd of MoS2 FET of 1-min sample; (b) Id–Vg of MoS2 FET (1 min-sample) at Vd = 1, 3, 4 and 5 V; (c,d) Id–Vg of MoS2 FETs, 3 min-sample (c), and 5 min-sample (d) at fixed Vd = 1V.
Literature values of room temperature field-effect mobility for MoS2 FETs grown by various methods.
| S. No. | Growth method | Ion/Ioff | Mobility [cm2/Vs] | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sputtering (MoS2) + CVD | ~104 | ~29 (~1.4 nm) ~173–181 (~3.8~6 nm) | This work |
| 2 | CVD (MoO3 + S) | ~107 | 24 | Appl.Phys. Lett., 106 (2015) 062101 |
| 3 | Sputtering (MoS2) | ~103 | 12.2 | Nanoscale, 2015,7, 2497–2503 |
| 4 | MoO3 powder + Mo substrate+ CVD | 192 | Appl. Phys. Lett., 105 (2014) 072105 | |
| 5 | Ebeam (Mo) + CVD | 12±2 | Appl. Phys. Lett., 102 (2013) 252108. | |
| 6 | Sputtering (Mo)+ CVD | ~1.5 × 106 ~5 × 104 | 12 (~1.1 nm) 0.44 (~6.4 nm) | ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6 (23), 21215–21222 |
| 7 | CVD (MoCl5 + S) | ~104~105 | 0.003–0.03 | Scientific Reports 3 : 1866 DOI: 10.1038/srep01866 |
| 8 | CVD (MoO3 + S) on rGO | ~104 | 0.02 | Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2320–2325 |
| 9 | CVD (MoO3 + S) | ~106 | 2~7 | ACS Nano, 2014, 8 (6), 6024–6030 |
| 10 | Ebeam (Mo) + CVD | 0.004~0.04 | Small 2012, 8, 966. | |
| 11 | CVD (MoO3 + S) | ~108 | 17 | Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 123104 (2012) |
| 12 | CVD (MoO3 + S) | ~104 ~106 | 0.1~0.7 | J. Amer. Chem. Society 2013, 135, 5304. |
| 13 | CVD (MoO3 + S) | ~103 | 0.09 | Nano Research 2014, 7 (12) : 1759–1768 |
| 14 | Thermal (MoO3)+ CVD on sapphire | ~105 | ~0.8 | Nanoscale, 2012,4, 6637–6641 |
| 15 | Thermolysis of (NH4)2MoS4 | ~105 | 4.7~6 | Nano Lett., 2012, 12 (3), 1538–1544 |
| 16 | Exfoliated (electrochemical) | ~106 | 1.2 | ACS Nano, 2014, 8 (7), 6902–6910 |
| 17 | CVD (H2S +Mo) | ~105 | 0.12 | Nanoscale, 2014,6, 2821–2826 |
| 18 | Mo(CO)6 + (C2H5)2S | ~104 | 30 | Nature, 2015, 520, 656–660 |
| 19 | CVD (MoO3 + S) | ~106 | 3.6 (1L), 8.2 (2L), 15.6 (3L) | Nanoscale, 2015,7, 1688–1695 |
| 20 | CVD(MoO3 + S) | 105~107 | ~3 to 4 | Nat. Mater., 2013, 12, 554–561. |