Literature DB >> 27489874

Meeting physical activity recommendations may be protective against temporal lobe atrophy in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease.

Ryan J Dougherty1, Laura D Ellingson2, Stephanie A Schultz3, Elizabeth A Boots3, Jacob D Meyer4, Jacob B Lindheimer1, Stephanie Van Riper1, Aaron J Stegner1, Dorothy F Edwards5, Jennifer M Oh3, Rebecca L Koscik6, Maritza N Dowling7, Catherine L Gallagher8, Cynthia M Carlsson8, Howard A Rowley9, Barbara B Bendlin3, Sanjay Asthana8, Bruce P Hermann10, Mark A Sager11, Sterling C Johnson3, Ozioma C Okonkwo3, Dane B Cook1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Physical activity (PA) is associated with brain health in older adults. However, it is unknown whether the current physical activity recommendations (PAR) impart substantive benefit. The objective of this study was to compare temporal lobe volumes between older adults who met PAR and those who did not.
METHODS: Ninety-one enrollees from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention wore an accelerometer for seven consecutive days to quantify their PA behaviors and underwent a T-1 anatomic magnetic resonance imaging scan. Participants were categorized as either having met PAR or not based on the US Department of Health and Human Services recommendations of 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week.
RESULTS: Participants who met PAR possessed significantly greater inferior (η(2) P  = .050) and anterior (η(2) P  = .055) temporal lobe volumes compared with those who did not (P < .05). DISCUSSION: Individuals at-risk for AD experience accelerated rates of brain atrophy. These results suggest that regular engagement in PA at or above PAR could attenuate this decline.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APOE ε4; Alzheimer's disease; Dementia; Exercise; Family history; Neuroimaging

Year:  2016        PMID: 27489874      PMCID: PMC4950614          DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)        ISSN: 2352-8729


Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects more than 5 million Americans and that number is projected to nearly triple by 2050 [1]. A hallmark feature of AD is brain atrophy, which typically precedes the onset of symptoms [2], [3] and is a predictor of future cognitive impairment [4], [5]. Physical activity (PA) and fitness may mitigate brain atrophy as both have been positively associated with gray matter volume in older adults [6], [7] and older adults at-risk for AD [8]. However, the influence of meeting physical activity recommendations (PAR) via accelerometry on brain volume in older adults is currently unknown. The Department of Health and Human Services along with the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association recommends accumulating 150 minutes of moderate intensity, or 75 minutes of vigorous intensity, or an equivalent combination of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per week to promote health in all adults [9], [10]. The temporal lobes atrophy with age, and this atrophy can predict cognitive decline to AD [11]. Thus, the present study investigated temporal lobe volumetric differences between older adults strictly categorized as having met PAR and those who were insufficiently active.

Methods

Participants

Ninety-one older adults (ages 50–74 years) from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP) cohort volunteered to participate. The WRAP is a longitudinal registry composed of more than 1500 cognitively healthy adults [12]. The sample for this study included a large proportion of participants at-risk for AD (78%); defined as possessing either a parental family history (FH) of AD (70%), and/or the apolipoprotein epsilon 4 allele (APOE ε4) (46%), which closely reflects the makeup of the WRAP cohort. Participants were determined to be cognitively healthy using the mini-mental state examination (MMSE ≥ 24), did not have any major medical conditions (e.g. neurological diseases, psychiatric disorders), and were deemed safe for neuroimaging procedures. The University of Wisconsin Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Physical activity assessment

All participants wore a triaxial GT3X+ accelerometer (Actigraph, Pensacola, FL) on their hip for seven consecutive days. Participants were instructed to wear the device during all waking hours, with the exception of when showering, swimming, or bathing. Standard accelerometry inclusion criteria consisted of at least 10 hours of valid wear time per day for a minimum of three weekdays and one weekend day [13]. Accelerometer data (in 1-second epochs) were processed using the validated Sojourn-3 axis method which uses an artificial neural net to identify boundaries between activities of different intensities and to estimate metabolic equivalents (METs) for each bout [14]. To calculate minutes spent in different intensity categories of PA, estimated METs were determined for each bout interval and were then separated into PA categories accordingly: <1.5 METs = sedentary, 1.5–2.99 METs = light, 3–5.99 METs = moderate and >6 METs = vigorous. Consistent with current public health PAR, total minutes spent in MVPA in bouts of 10 minutes or greater were used to determine whether the participant met the 150 minutes of MVPA recommendation [9], [10].

Neuroimaging protocol

Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were acquired on a GE X750 Discovery 3.0-T scanner with an eight-channel phased array head coil (General Electric, Waukesha, WI). Three-dimensional T1-weighted inversion recovery prepared spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) anatomic sequences were collected using the following parameters: TI/TE/TR = 450 ms/3.2 ms/8.2 ms, flip angle = 12°, slice thickness = 1 mm no gap, field of view (FOV) = 256, matrix size = 256 × 256, yielding a voxel resolution of 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm. Temporal lobe regions of interest (ROIs) included superior, middle, inferior, temporal pole, hippocampus, parahippocampal, and entorhinal. These were derived from the T1 images using the Freesurfer image analysis suite, version 5.1.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/), with automated volumetric segmentation. Further technical processing details are described in previous publications [15], [16]. All images were visually inspected and edited (if necessary) by trained personnel to ensure that they were accurately reconstructed and without topologic defects. A summary measure for each region of interest was derived by averaging the values from the right and left hemispheres and then expressed as a percentage of intracranial volume (ICV) to account for differences in overall head size.

Statistical analyses

Independent samples t tests compared demographic information between those who met PAR and those who did not. Bivariate correlations explored the associations between age and temporal lobe volume ROIs. A single multivariate analysis of covariance was conducted to determine differences in brain volume between groups, controlling for age and gender with the significance level (α) set at 0.05. Because there is evidence showing that PA may have a more robust effect on brain volume in those at-risk for AD [17], secondary analyses limited to at-risk participants were conducted. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS, version 22.0.

Results

Sample

Ninety-one cognitively healthy (MMSE = 29.3 ± 1.1) participants (mean age = 64 ± 5.8) completed the study (see Table 1 for participant characteristics). Twenty-nine participants met the PAR of 150 minutes of MVPA and sixty-two did not. Groups did not differ on any measured demographic characteristics (P > .05). The volumes of all ROIs included in the analyses were significantly and negatively correlated with age (P < .05; r = −.173 to −.352).
Table 1

Participant demographics

VariableTotal sampleSample meeting PARSample not meeting PAR
Sample size912962
Female, %666268
Age, y64.1 (5.8)63.5 (4.9)64.4 (6.2)
BMI, kg/m228.1 (5.7)26.5 (3.0)28.9 (6.4)
Education, y16.3 (2.4)15.7 (2.5)16.6 (2.3)
MMSE, score29.3 (1.1)29.3 (1.5)29.2 (1.2)
At-risk, %787679
FH positive, %706971
APOE ε4 positive, %463452
Caucasian, %969397
Actigraph worn, d6.5 (0.5)6.5 (0.5)6.5 (0.5)
MVPA, total minutes109.9 (108.6)243.8 (84.3)47.2 (40.3)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; MMSE, mini-mental state examination; APOE ε4, the epsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene; FH, family history; MVPA, moderate-vigorous physical activity counting toward recommendations.

Values indicate mean score and standard deviation, unless otherwise indicated.

significant group difference (P < .05).

Physical activity and temporal lobe volume

After controlling for the effects of gender and age, there were significant group effects for the inferior temporal lobe (F(1,87) = 4.545, P = .036, η2 = .050) and the temporal pole (F(1,87) = 5.105, P = .026, η2 = .055). Individuals who met current PAR had larger inferior temporal and temporal pole volumes compared to those who did not meet PAR. No significant group differences were observed for the other ROIs (P > .05; Table 2). Limiting the sample to individuals at-risk (n = 22 met PAR; n = 49 did not meet PAR), we observed similar results with larger effect size differences specifically for the inferior temporal lobe [inferior temporal lobe: (F(1,67) = 6.820 P = .011, η2 = .092); temporal pole (F(1,67) = 4.258, P = .043, η2 = .060)].
Table 2

Temporal lobe volumes

Region of interestSample meeting PARSample not meeting PARP valueCohen's d effect size
Superior temporal.5004 (.0380).4994 (.0462).946.02
Middle temporal.4407 (.0327).4376 (.0404).789.08
Inferior temporal.4615 (.0486).4405 (.0418).036.46
Temporal pole.0609 (.0061).0575 (.0068).026.53
Hippocampus.5714 (.0687).5746 (.0624).732.05
Parahippocampal.0977 (.0098).0976 (.0125).950.01
Entorhinal.0523 (.0104).0518 (.0075).852.06

Values indicate mean volume and standard deviation. Region of interest volumes expressed as a % of ICV.

significant group difference controlling for age and gender (P < .05).

Discussion

In this cohort of cognitively healthy older adults, we observed greater temporal lobe volume in participants who engaged in current recommended levels of PA compared to those who did not. The observed effect size for the inferior temporal lobe was strengthened when the sample was limited to at-risk participants, highlighting the importance of meeting PAR for individuals with familial and/or genetic risk for AD. Our findings suggest that participation in regular PA at or above recommended levels may mitigate the detrimental effects of aging on temporal lobe volume. Physical activity and fitness have been associated with gray matter volume in older adults [6], [7]; however, there is limited research investigating whether meeting PAR is effective for attenuating declines in brain volume. Okonkwo et al. [8] found individuals who self-reported being physically active experienced less age-related alterations in AD biomarkers, including hippocampal volume. Another study found that only individuals self-reporting high levels of PA participation (top quartile) had greater gray matter volume, including areas within the temporal lobe than individuals in the lower three quartiles. The lower three quartiles were not significantly different from each other, suggesting there may be a threshold of PA necessary to confer protection [18]. Given the inherent limitations of self-reported PA, this study provides stronger evidence that meeting PAR can protect brain volume [19]. In our sample, 32% met the weekly PAR which is higher than the reported national average of 5% of older adults [13]. This discrepancy highlights both a strength and a limitation of this study. The large percentage of individuals who met PAR allowed for meaningful comparisons between groups. However, the large percentage of participants meeting PAR suggests that the volunteer WRAP cohort may not be reflective of the general population of older adults. Individuals at-risk for AD experience accelerated rates of brain atrophy. The findings of this study add to a growing body of literature supporting the positive impact of PA behaviors on brain health in older adulthood. However, the cross-sectional design of the present study does not allow for causal inferences to be made. Dose manipulation studies aimed at manipulating physical activity and determining whether a change in PA levels is necessary to preserve temporal lobe volume are needed to more fully test these hypotheses. Notably, using objective assessment of PA behaviors, this study suggests that weekly PA at or above PAR is not only beneficial for overall health; it may be an important way for older adults to preserve temporal lobe volume using natural, affordable methods that are safe and accessible. Systematic review: The authors surveyed the literature related to fitness, physical activity (PA), and brain volume in older adults. There is evidence that fitness and self-reported PA are positively associated with brain volume in older adulthood. However, the influence of objectively meeting PA recommendations (via accelerometry) on brain volume in adults is currently unknown. Interpretation: These findings support that regular engagement in PA at or above the current recommendations is not only beneficial for overall health, it may be an important way for older adults to preserve temporal lobe volume using natural, affordable methods that are safe and accessible. Future directions: The analyses in the present study are cross-sectional therefore causal inferences cannot be made. Dose manipulation studies aimed at manipulating PA and determining whether a change in PA levels are necessary to preserve temporal lobe volume are needed to more fully test these hypotheses.
  18 in total

1.  Atrophy of the medial occipitotemporal, inferior, and middle temporal gyri in non-demented elderly predict decline to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  A Convit; J de Asis; M J de Leon; C Y Tarshish; S De Santi; H Rusinek
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Physical activity predicts gray matter volume in late adulthood: the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  K I Erickson; C A Raji; O L Lopez; J T Becker; C Rosano; A B Newman; H M Gach; P M Thompson; A J Ho; L H Kuller
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Increased brain atrophy rates in cognitively normal older adults with low cerebrospinal fluid Aβ1-42.

Authors:  Jonathan M Schott; Jonathan W Bartlett; Nick C Fox; Josephine Barnes
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system.

Authors:  B Fischl; M I Sereno; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Correlation between rates of brain atrophy and cognitive decline in AD.

Authors:  N C Fox; R I Scahill; W R Crum; M N Rossor
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-05-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Physical activity attenuates age-related biomarker alterations in preclinical AD.

Authors:  Ozioma C Okonkwo; Stephanie A Schultz; Jennifer M Oh; Jordan Larson; Dorothy Edwards; Dane Cook; Rebecca Koscik; Catherine L Gallagher; N M Dowling; Cynthia M Carlsson; Barbara B Bendlin; Asenath LaRue; Howard A Rowley; Brad T Christian; Sanjay Asthana; Bruce P Hermann; Sterling C Johnson; Mark A Sager
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  A method to estimate free-living active and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer.

Authors:  Kate Lyden; Sarah Kozey Keadle; John Staudenmayer; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.

Authors:  Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Mapping the evolution of regional atrophy in Alzheimer's disease: unbiased analysis of fluid-registered serial MRI.

Authors:  Rachael I Scahill; Jonathan M Schott; John M Stevens; Martin N Rossor; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Physical activity reduces hippocampal atrophy in elders at genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J Carson Smith; Kristy A Nielson; John L Woodard; Michael Seidenberg; Sally Durgerian; Kathleen E Hazlett; Christina M Figueroa; Cassandra C Kandah; Christina D Kay; Monica A Matthews; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.750

View more
  16 in total

1.  Moderate Physical Activity is Associated with Cerebral Glucose Metabolism in Adults at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Ryan J Dougherty; Stephanie A Schultz; Taylor K Kirby; Elizabeth A Boots; Jennifer M Oh; Dorothy Edwards; Catherine L Gallagher; Cynthia M Carlsson; Barbara B Bendlin; Sanjay Asthana; Mark A Sager; Bruce P Hermann; Bradley T Christian; Sterling C Johnson; Dane B Cook; Ozioma C Okonkwo
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

2.  An Objective Method to Accurately Measure Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Older Adults Who Cannot Satisfy Widely Used Oxygen Consumption Criteria.

Authors:  Ryan J Dougherty; Jacob B Lindheimer; Aaron J Stegner; Stephanie Van Riper; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Dane B Cook
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  Fitness, independent of physical activity is associated with cerebral blood flow in adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Ryan J Dougherty; Elizabeth A Boots; Jacob B Lindheimer; Aaron J Stegner; Stephanie Van Riper; Dorothy F Edwards; Catherine L Gallagher; Cynthia M Carlsson; Howard A Rowley; Barbara B Bendlin; Sanjay Asthana; Bruce P Hermann; Mark A Sager; Sterling C Johnson; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Dane B Cook
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Leisure Activity, Brain β-amyloid, and Episodic Memory in Adults with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Iulia Mihaila; Benjamin L Handen; Bradley T Christian; Patrick J Lao; Karly A Cody; William E Klunk; Dana L Tudorascu; Annie D Cohen; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Sigan L Hartley
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.964

5.  Five-year changes in objectively measured cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and sedentary time in mid-to-late adulthood.

Authors:  Ryan J Dougherty; Sarah R Lose; Julian M Gaitán; Brandon M Mergen; Nathaniel A Chin; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Dane B Cook
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.016

Review 6.  The Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: A review of findings and current directions.

Authors:  Sterling C Johnson; Rebecca L Koscik; Erin M Jonaitis; Lindsay R Clark; Kimberly D Mueller; Sara E Berman; Barbara B Bendlin; Corinne D Engelman; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Kirk J Hogan; Sanjay Asthana; Cynthia M Carlsson; Bruce P Hermann; Mark A Sager
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2017-12-08

7.  What do we know from clinical trials on exercise and Alzheimer's disease?

Authors:  Yong Shen; Rena Li
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 7.179

8.  [Effect of physical exercise on Alzheimer's disease. A sistematic review].

Authors:  María Ángela Agüera Sánchez; Miguel Ángel Barbancho Ma; Natalia García-Casares
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 1.137

9.  Objectively measured physical activity profile and cognition in Finnish elderly twins.

Authors:  Paula Iso-Markku; Katja Waller; Eero Vuoksimaa; Henri Vähä-Ypyä; Noora Lindgren; Kauko Heikkilä; Harri Sievänen; Juha Rinne; Jaakko Kaprio; Urho M Kujala
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-14

10.  Cerebral changes improved by physical activity during cognitive decline: A systematic review on MRI studies.

Authors:  Alexa Haeger; Ana S Costa; Jörg B Schulz; Kathrin Reetz
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.