Literature DB >> 27489404

The Role of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability in Models of Infant Cochlear Implant Management.

Colleen Psarros1, Sarah Love2.   

Abstract

Newborn hearing screening has led to the early diagnosis of hearing loss in neonates and early device fitting is common, based primarily on electrophysiologic and radiologic information, with some supplementary behavioral measures. Such early fitting of hearing devices, in particular cochlear implants (CIs), has been beneficial to the majority of children implanted under the age of 12 months who meet the cochlear implant candidacy criteria. Comorbidities are common in children with hearing loss, although they may not be evident in neonates and may not emerge until later in infants. Evidence suggests that the child's outcomes are strongly influenced by a range of environmental factors including emotional and social support from the immediate and extended family. Consequently, such factors are important in service planning and service delivery for babies and children receiving CIs. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability (ICF) can provide a framework to facilitate the holistic management of pediatric cochlear implant recipients. The ICF also can be used to map the progress of recipients over time to highlight emerging issues that require intervention. This article will discuss our preliminary use of the ICF to establish clinical practice; develop advocacy skills among clients and their families; identify eligibility for services such as support in educational settings; enable access to modes of service delivery such as telepractice; provide a conceptual framework for policy and program development for pediatric cochlear implant recipients (i.e., in both disability and health services); and, most importantly, establish a clear pathway for the longitudinal management of the cochlear implant in a child's future. It is anticipated that this model will be applied to other populations receiving cochlear implants through our program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; WHO-ICF; infant; intervention; newborn hearing screening

Year:  2016        PMID: 27489404      PMCID: PMC4954782          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1584414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  20 in total

1.  International classification of functioning, disability, and health core sets for hearing loss: a discussion paper and invitation.

Authors:  Berth Danermark; Alarcos Cieza; Jean-Pierre Gangé; Francesca Gimigliano; Sarah Granberg; Louise Hickson; Sophia E Kramer; Bradley McPherson; Claes Möller; Ieda Russo; Jan Peter Strömgren; Gerold Stucki; Dewet Swanepoel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  CHARGE syndrome and Cochlear implantation: difficulties and outcomes in the paediatric population.

Authors:  Catherine S Birman; Jane A Brew; William P R Gibson; Elizabeth J Elliott
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Trans-tympanic electric auditory brainstem response (TT-EABR): the importance of the positioning of the stimulating electrode.

Authors:  Henry Pau; William P R Gibson; Halit Sanli
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2006-12

4.  Abnormal positive potentials in round window electrocochleography.

Authors:  S J O'Leary; T E Mitchell; W P Gibson; H Sanli
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-11

5.  Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing.

Authors:  M P Moeller
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) scale: normative data.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Mandy Hill
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  Children with cochlear implants and complex needs: a review of outcome research and psychological practice.

Authors:  Lindsey C Edwards
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2007-05-09

8.  Parenting stress in parents of children with cochlear implants: relationships among parent stress, child language, and unilateral versus bilateral implants.

Authors:  Julia Sarant; Philippa Garrard
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2013-06-27

9.  Common cavity and custom-made electrodes: speech perception and audiological performance of children with common cavity implanted with a custom-made MED-EL electrode.

Authors:  Millo Achille Beltrame; Catherine S Birman; Javier Cervera Escario; Jamal Kassouma; Spiros Manolidis; Michael Blair Pringle; Philip Robinson; Manuel Sainz Quevedo; Mary Shanks; Markus Suckfüll; Manuel Tomás Barberán
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Non-syndromic recessive auditory neuropathy is the result of mutations in the otoferlin (OTOF) gene.

Authors:  R Varga; P M Kelley; B J Keats; A Starr; S M Leal; E Cohn; W J Kimberling
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.318

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Importance of Early Genetic Diagnostics of Hearing Loss in Children.

Authors:  Nina Božanić Urbančič; Saba Battelino; Tine Tesovnik; Katarina Trebušak Podkrajšek
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.430

2.  The Quest for Ecological Validity in Hearing Science: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Advance It.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Graham Naylor; Douglas S Brungart; Andreas Caduff; Jennifer Campos; Simon Carlile; Mark G Carpenter; Giso Grimm; Volker Hohmann; Inga Holube; Stefan Launer; Thomas Lunner; Ravish Mehra; Frances Rapport; Malcolm Slaney; Karolina Smeds
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.