Literature DB >> 27489354

Association of the GLB1 rs4678680 genetic variant with risk of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Wen-Tao Wang1, Ziqiang Li1, Meng Shi2,3, Hui Zhu4, Xiangyu Xiong3, Jinhua Shang3, Jibing Liu5, Mujian Teng1, Ming Yang2.   

Abstract

Accumulated evidences demonstrated that GLB1 is involved in cell senescence and cancer development. The GLB1 rs4678680 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) has been identified as a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) susceptibility polymorphism by a genome-wide association study in Korean population previously. However, little or nothing was known about its involvement and functional significance in hepatitis B viruses (HBV)-related HCC in Chinese. Therefore, we investigated the association between the GLB1 rs4678680 SNP and HBV-related HCC risk as well as its biological function in vivo. Genotypes were determined in two independent case-control sets from two medical centers of China. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression. The potential regulation role the rs4678680 genetic variant on GLB1 expression was examined with HCC and normal liver tissues. We found that The rs4678680 G allele was showed to be risk allele; individuals with the TG genotype had an OR of 1.51 (95% CI = 1.10-2.07, P = 0.010, Shandong set) or 1.49 (95% CI = 1.11-1.99, P = 0.008, Jiangsu set) for developing HBV-related HCC, respectively, compared with individuals with the TT genotype. This association was more pronounced in males, individuals aged older than 57 years and drinkers (all P < 0.05). In the genotype-phenotype correlation analyses of fifty-six human liver tissue samples, rs4678680 TG or GG was associated with a statistically significant increase of GLB1 mRNA expression (P < 0.05). Our data indicated that the GLB1 rs4678680 SNP contributes to susceptibility to develop HBV-related HCC, highlighting the involvement of GLB1 and cell senescence in etiology of HCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GLB1; HBV; HCC; genetic polymorphism; susceptibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27489354      PMCID: PMC5302931          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Although ranking the fifth most common cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide [1]. There is a high incidence of HCC in China and other Asia-Pacific region [1]. Notably, China alone accounts for about 50% of all HCC cases in the world [1, 2]. There were several epidemiological features, such as marked variations between geographical regions, racial and ethnic groups, and sex. It has been revealed that men have a higher prevalence of HCC than women, i.e. the male:female ratio of HCC patients is ~2.65:1 in high-risk Chinese populations [2, 3]. Chronic infections with the hepatitis B or C viruses (HBV or HCV), exposure to dietary aflatoxin B as well as excessive alcohol drinking have been identified as major environmental risk factors of HCC [2, 3]. Since about 75% cases of HCC are associated with HBV infection in China [4], HBV infection is considered as one major risk factor for HCC. However, only 15% chronic HBV carriers suffer from HCC in their lifetime [2, 3], indicating that host genetic factors may also be involved in development of HBV-related HCC. This notion has been proved by several candidate gene and genome-wide association study (GWAS) on HBV-related HCC in eastern Asians [5-10]. To identify genetic factors associated with HCC, Clifford et al. conducted a comprehensive, genome-wide variation analysis (both genetic polymorphisms and copy number variations) in a population of unrelated Asian individuals [11]. After genotyping 386 Korean HCC cases and 587 Korean controls with the Affymetrix SNP6.0 assay, they found that the 3p21.33 GLB1 rs4678680 G > T polymorphism is most significantly associated with HCC risk (odds ratio [OR] = 2.27, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.68–3.08, P = 6 × 10−7). GLB1 encodes a member of the glycosyl hydrolase 35 family of proteins, which catalyzes the hydrolysis of a terminal betalinked galactose residue from ganglioside substrates and other glycoconjugates. Accumulated evidences demonstrated that GLB1 is involved in cell senescence [12, 13] and cancer development [13-16]. Senescence phenotype could be induced by increased SA-b-galactosidase staining and elevated GLB1 mRNA expression, indicating the important role of GLB1 in cell senescence. During the long latency of tumor development, oncogene-induced senescence has emerged as a barrier to tumorigenesis including HCC. Chen et al. conducted a replication case-control study on the association of 1p36.22, 2q32.2–q32.3, 3p21.33, 8p12, 14q32.11 and 21q21.3 with HCC among 507 Chinese HCC patients and 3014 Chinese controls. However, they did not included GLB1 rs4678680 G > T single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the study. As a result, it is still largely unclear if GLB1 rs4678680 polymorphism plays a part in etiology of HCC in Chinese. Also, little or nothing has been known about functional significance of the GLB1 rs4678680 SNP in HBV-related HCC. Therefore, we conducted two large independent case-control studies to investigate the association between the GLB1 rs4678680 genetic polymorphism and risk for developing HBV-related HCC. To validate the biological function of the rs4678680 SNP in vivo, we examined the association between GLB1 rs4678680 genotypes and its mRNA expression levels in normal liver tissues.

RESULTS

Allele frequencies and genotype distributions of GLB1 rs4678680 SNP in cases and controls from the Shandong and Jiangsu sets are showed in Table 1. The allele frequencies for rs4678680 G were 0.087 or 0.094 in cases and 0.059 or 0.058 in controls in Shandong or Jiangsu case-control set. All observed genotype frequencies in both cases and controls conform to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Distributions of the rs4678680 genotypes were compared between HCC cases and controls. Frequencies of rs4678680 TT, TG and GG genotypes among HCC cases differed significantly from those among controls in either Shandong set (χ2 = 7.593, P = 0.022, df = 2) or Jiangsu set (χ2 = 16.14, P = 3.12 × 10−4, df = 2).
Table 1

Genotype frequencies of the GLB1 rs4678680 G > T polymorphism among HCC cases and chronic HBV carriers and its association with HBV-related HCC risk

StudiesGenotypesHCC cases No. (%)Chronic HBV carriers No. (%)ORa (95% CI)P-valuea
n = 1186n = 508
TT987 (83.2)449 (88.4)Reference
Shandong setTG192 (16.2)58 (11.4)1.51 (1.10–2.07)0.010
GG7 (0.6)1 (0.2)NC
TG + GG199 (16.8)59 (11.6)1.53 (1.12–2.10)0.007
n = 620n = 1200
TT509 (82.1)1062 (88.4)Reference
Jiangsu setTG105 (16.9)136 (11.3)1.49 (1.11–1.99)0.008
GG6 (1.0)2 (0.2)NC
TG + GG111 (17.9)138 (11.5)1.57 (1.18–2.09)0.002
n = 1806n = 1708
TT1496 (82.8)1511 (88.5)Reference
PooledTG297 (16.5)194 (11.4)1.56 (1.24–1.97)1.76 × 10−4
GG13 (0.7)3 (0.2)NC
TG + GG310 (17.2)197 (11.6)1.52 (1.19–1.94)0.001

Note: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculated.

HCC case vs. chronic HBV carriers, data were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, smoking and drinking.

Note: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculated. HCC case vs. chronic HBV carriers, data were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, smoking and drinking. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between the GLB1 rs4678680 SNP and HBV-related HCC risk in Shandong and Jiangsu sets (Table 1). The rs4678680 G allele was showed to be risk allele; individuals with the TG genotype had an OR of 1.51 (95% CI = 1.10–2.07, P = 0.010, Shandong set) or 1.49 (95% CI = 1.11–1.99, P = 0.008, Jiangsu set) for developing HBV-related HCC, respectively, compared with individuals with the TT genotype (Table 1). It was also found that carriers of the rs4678680 TG or GG genotype showed significantly and consistently increased risk to develop HBV-related HCC compared with the TT carriers in both case-control sets (Shandong set: OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.12–2.10, P = 0.007; Jiangsu set: OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.18–2.09, P = 0.002). In the pooled analyses, we observed that the odds of having the rs4678680 TG genotype in cases was 1.56 (95% CI = 1.24–1.97, P = 1.76 × 10−4) compared with the TT genotype. Similarly, the rs4678680 TG or GG genotype carriers showed a 1.52-fold increased HCC risk compared with the TT genotype carriers (95% CI = 1.19–1.94, P = 0.001). The risk of HBV-related HCC associated with the GLB1 rs4678680 genotypes was further examined by stratifying for sex (Table 2). A significantly increased risk of HCC associated with the rs4678680 TG or GG genotype compared with the TT genotype was observed in males (Shandong set: OR =1.60, 95% CI = 1.15–2.23; P = 0.006; Jiangsu set: OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.17–2.16; P = 0.003). However, this genetic polymorphism was not significantly associated with HCC risk in females (all P > 0.05). In the stratification analyses with age, elevated risk of HCC associated with the GLB1 rs4678680 TG or GG genotype was only observed among individuals aged older than 57 years (Shandong set: OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.01–2.62; P = 0.047), but not among individuals aged 57 years or younger (Shandong set: OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 0.96–2.21; P = 0.076) (Table 3). Similar results were observed among individuals aged older than 57 years in Jiangsu set (rs4678680 TG or GG genotype: OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.37–3.21; P = 0.001). Interestingly, the rs4678680 TG or GG genotype was also significantly associated with increased HCC risk in drinkers compared to the TT genotype in both sets (Shandong: OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.26–2.86, P = 0.002; Jiangsu: OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.21–2.57, P = 0.003) (Table 4). However, no such associations was observed among non-drinkers (all P > 0.05).
Table 2

Risk of HBV-related HCC associated with GLB1 rs4678680 G > T genotypes by sex

StudiesGenotypesMalesFemales
Cases No. (%)Controls No. (%)ORa (95% CI)P-valueaCases No. (%)Controls No. (%)ORa (95% CI)P-valuea
n = 1018n = 425n = 168n = 83
TT848 (83.3)373 (87.8)Reference139 (82.7)76 (91.6)Reference
Shandong setTG164 (16.1)51 (12.0)1.58 (1.13–2.21)0.00828 (16.7)7 (8.4)1.39 (0.54–3.60)0.500
GG6 (0.6)1 (0.2)NC1 (0.6)0 (0)NC
TG + GG170 (16.7)52 (12.2)1.60 (1.15–2.23)0.00629 (17.3)7 (8.4)1.47 (0.57–3.77)0.428
n = 531n = 998n = 89n = 202
TT437 (82.3)884 (88.6)Reference72 (80.9)178 (88.1)Reference
Jiangsu setTG88 (16.6)112 (11.2)1.50 (1.11–2.05)0.01117 (19.1)24 (11.9)1.36 (0.38–4.83)0.639
GG6 (1.1)2 (0.2)NC0 (0)0 (0)NC
TG + GG94 (17.7)114 (11.4)1.59 (1.17–2.16)0.00317 (19.1)24 (11.9)1.36 (0.38–4.83)0.639

Note: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculated.

HCC case vs. chronic HBV carriers, data were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, smoking and drinking.

Table 3

Risk of HBV-related HCC associated with GLB1 rs4678680 G >T genotypes by age

StudiesGenotypesAge(≤ 57 years)Age(> 57 years)
Cases No. (%)Controls No. (%)ORa (95% CI)P-valueaCases No. (%)Controls No. (%)ORa (95% CI)P-valuea
n = 627n = 262n = 559n = 246
TT516 (82.3)228 (87.0)Reference471 (84.3)221 (89.8)Reference
Shandong setTG108 (17.2)33 (12.6)1.46 (0.96–2.23)0.07784 (15.0)25 (10.2)1.56 (0.96–2.51)0.072
GG3 (0.5)1 (0.4)NC4 (0.7)0 (0)NC
TG + GG111 (17.7)34 (13.0)1.46 (0.96–2.21)0.07688 (15.7)25 (10.2)1.63 (1.01–2.62)0.047
n = 315n = 633n = 305n = 567
TT265 (84.1)552 (87.2)Reference244 (80.0)510 (89.9)Reference
Jiangsu setTG44 (14.0)79 (12.5)1.06 (0.70–1.60)0.79161 (20.0)57 (10.1)2.10 (1.37–3.21)0.001
GG6 (1.9)2 (0.3)NC0 (0)0 (0)NC
TG + GG50 (15.9)81 (12.8)1.19 (0.80–1.78)0.38861 (20.0)57 (10.1)2.10 (1.37-3.21)0.001

Note: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculated.

HCC case vs. chronic HBV carriers, data were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for sex, smoking and drinking.

Table 4

Risk of HBV-related HCC associated with GLB1 rs4678680 G > T genotypes by alcohol drinking

StudiesGenotypesNondrinkersDrinkers
Cases No. (%)Controls No. (%)ORa (95% CI)P-valueaCases No. (%)Controls No. (%)ORa (95% CI)P-valuea
n = 410n = 195n = 776n = 313
TT349 (85.1)168 (86.2)Reference638 (82.2)281 (89.8)Reference
Shandong setTG59 (14.4)26 (13.3)1.16 (0.70–1.92)0.578133 (17.2)32 (10.2)1.82 (1.21–2.75)0.004
GG2 (0.5)1 (0.5)NC5 (0.6)0 (0)NC
TG+GG61 (14.9)27 (13.8)1.14 (0.69–1.87)0.620138 (17.8)32 (10.2)1.90 (1.26–2.86)0.002
n = 156n = 706n = 464n = 494
TT133 (85.3)629 (89.1)Reference376 (81.1)433 (87.7)Reference
Jiangsu setTG20 (12.8)76 (10.8)1.25 (0.68–2.29)0.46885 (18.3)60 (12.1)1.72 (1.17–2.51)0.006
GG3 (1.9)1 (0.1)NC3 (0.6)1 (0.2)NC
TG + GG23 (14.7)77 (10.9)1.42 (0.79–2.53)0.24088 (18.9)61 (12.3)1.76 (1.21–2.57)0.003

Note: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculated.

HCC case vs. chronic HBV carriers, data were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex and smoking.

Note: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculated. HCC case vs. chronic HBV carriers, data were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, smoking and drinking. Note: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculated. HCC case vs. chronic HBV carriers, data were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for sex, smoking and drinking. Note: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculated. HCC case vs. chronic HBV carriers, data were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex and smoking. We next examined whether the HCC susceptibility SNP rs4678680 has an allele-specific impact on GLB1 expression using HCC tissues since it locates in a 18 kb upstream region of GLB1. As shown in Figure 1, we found that there were significantly higher GLB1 mRNA levels (mean ± SD) in HCC tissues compared to normal tissues (313.3 ± 33.93 vs. 189.9 ± 21.1; P = 0.003). Subjects with the rs4678680 TG or GG genotype had significantly higher GLB1 mRNA levels than those with the TT genotypes in normal tissues (TG or GG: 367.5 ± 40.2 [n = 9], TT: 155.9 ± 20.6 [n = 47]; P = 0.001). Similar results were observed when the GLB1 mRNA levels were compared between rs4678680 TG or GG and TT genotypes in HCC tissues (TG or GG: 590.7 ± 32.2 [n = 9], TT: 260.1 ± 35.0 [n = 47]; P = 0.001) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

GLB1 mRNA expression in fifty-six pairs of HCC-normal liver tissues

(A) There were higher GLB1 mRNA expression in HCC tissues than those in normal liver tissues. (B) GLB1 mRNA expression in normal liver tissues grouped by GLB1 rs4678680 genotypes. (C) GLB1 mRNA expression in HCC tissues grouped by GLB1 rs4678680 genotypes.

GLB1 mRNA expression in fifty-six pairs of HCC-normal liver tissues

(A) There were higher GLB1 mRNA expression in HCC tissues than those in normal liver tissues. (B) GLB1 mRNA expression in normal liver tissues grouped by GLB1 rs4678680 genotypes. (C) GLB1 mRNA expression in HCC tissues grouped by GLB1 rs4678680 genotypes.

DISCUSSION

In the current study, we examined the association between the GLB1 rs4678680 SNP and risk of developing HBV-related HCC in a case-control design. Although the genetic predisposition to HCC of the GLB1 rs4678680 polymorphism was firstly identified in Korean populations via GWAS, this is still the first validation study with relative large sample size in different ethnic populations. We found significantly increased HCC risk among individuals with the GLB1 rs4678680 TG or GG genotype compared with those with TT genotype in Chinese. In the genotype-phenotype correlation analyses of fifty-six human liver tissue samples, rs4678680 TG or GG was associated with a statistically significant increase of GLB1 mRNA expression. The GLB1 gene provides instructions for producing an enzyme called β-galactosidase. This enzyme is located in lysosomes, which are compartments within cells that break down and recycle different types of molecules. Within lysosomes, GLB1 helps break down certain molecules, including substances called GM1 ganglioside and keratan sulfate. Caldwell et al. found that GLB1 activity is the only biomarker that accurately identifies a small and heterogeneous population of non-proliferating premalignant cells in the pancreas, indicating the utility of GLB1 to predict the senescent state in pancreatic preneoplasia [13]. Additionally, increased GLB1 is a valuable marker in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues for the senescence-like phenotype and associates with improved prostate cancer outcomes [16]. All these evidences support the involvement of GLB1 in carcinogenesis, possibly through regulating cell senescence. Several limitations may exist in this case-control study. First, because it was a hospital-based study and the cases were from hospitals, there might be inherent selection bias. As a result, it is crucial to confirm these observations in a population-based prospective study. Second, the statistical power for gene-covariate interaction analyses may be limited. Third, since the P value for association between the GLB1 rs4678680 SNP and HCC risk in the current study are not less that 10−7, it is possible that these polymorphisms may not be identified by the aforementioned four large scale HCC GWAS in Chinese [7-10]. In summary, our study elucidated that the GLB1 rs4678680 polymorphism was associated with risk of HBV-related HCC in Chinese populations, highlighting the involvement of GLB1 and cell senescence in etiology of HCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study subjects

This study consisted of two case-control sets (Supplementary Table S1): (a) Shandong set: 1186 individuals with HBV-related HCC, sex- and age-matched (± 5 years) 508 chronic HBV carriers were recruited at Shandong Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences (Jinan, Shandong Province, China). (b) Jiangsu set: 620 HBV-related HCC individuals from Huaian No. 2 Hospital (Huaian, Jiangsu Province, China) and sex- and age-matched 1200 chronic HBV carriers as controls. Cases and controls were recruited at Huaian No. 2 Hospital. The case-control sets has been reported previously [17]. A total of 56 pairs of HCC tissue specimens from 56 HCC individuals recruited in this study. All HCC individuals received curative resection in Huaian No. 2 Hospital or Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University. Prior to the surgery, no HCC individuals received any local or systemic anticancer treatments. All subjects were ethnic Han Chinese. At recruitment, the written informed consent was obtained from each subject. This study was approved by the institutional Review Boards of Shandong Cancer Hospital, Qianfoshan Hospital and Huaian No. 2 Hospital.

SNP genotyping

The GLB1 rs4678680 polymorphism was analyzed by the MassArray system (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, California, USA). GLB1 rs4678680 PCR primers are 5′-ACGTTGGATGAGTCCAAGCCTGCTTTCTTC-3′ (Forward) and 5′-ACGTTGGATGTCTGCCGAGTTGT TGCAAAG-3′ (Reverse). GLB1 rs4678680 UEP_SEQ primer is 5′-cctcaTGCTTTCTTCCCTTTTCT-3′. GLB1 rs4678680 EXT1_SEQ primer is 5′-cctcaTGCTTTCT TCCCTTTTCTG-3′. GLB1 rs4678680 EXT2_SEQ primer is 5′-cctcaTGCTTTCTTCCCTTTTCTT-3′. A 15% blind, random sample of study subjects was genotyped in duplicates and the reproducibility was 100%.

Real-time analyses of GLB1 mRNA

SYBR-Green real-time quantity PCR method was used to examine GLB1 mRNA levels in normal liver tissues as described previously [18-20]. Total cellular RNA was isolated and converted to cDNA using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (TOYOBO). Relative gene expression quantitation for GLB1 and β-actin as an internal reference gene was carried out using the ABI 7500 real-time PCR system in triplicates. The primers used for GLB1 were 5′- GTCTATTCTTCTCCGCTCCT −3′ and 5′- TGTGCTCCATCAGTGGTAA −3′; and for β-actin were 5′-GGCGGCACCACCATGTACCCT-3′ and 5′-AGGGGCCGGACTCGTCATACT-3′. The expression of individual GLB1 mRNA measurements was measured relative to expression of β-actin mRNA using the method as described previously [21].

Statistic analyses

The differences in demographic variables and genotype distributions of the GLB1 rs4678680 SNP between cases and controls were examined via Pearson's χ2 test. The associations between genotypes of GLB1 rs4678680 and HBV-related HCC risk were estimated by ORs and their 95% CIs computed by logistic regression models. All ORs were adjusted for age, sex, smoking or drinking status, where it was appropriate. Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance tests were performed to calculate GLB1 mRNA expression differences between different rs4678680 genotype carriers. A P value of less than 0.05 was used as the criterion of statistical significance, and all statistical tests were two-sided. All analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc.).
  21 in total

Review 1.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia: consensus statement from the Asian Oncology Summit 2009.

Authors:  Donald Poon; Benjamin O Anderson; Li-Tzong Chen; Koichi Tanaka; Wan Yee Lau; Eric Van Cutsem; Harjit Singh; Wan Cheng Chow; London Lucien Ooi; Pierce Chow; Maung Win Khin; Wen Hsin Koo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Cellular features of senescence during the evolution of human and murine ductal pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M E Caldwell; G M DeNicola; C P Martins; M A Jacobetz; A Maitra; R H Hruban; D A Tuveson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Genetic variations at loci involved in the immune response are risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Clifford; Jinghui Zhang; Daoud M Meerzaman; Myung-Soo Lyu; Ying Hu; Constance M Cultraro; Richard P Finney; Jenny M Kelley; Sol Efroni; Sharon I Greenblum; Cu V Nguyen; William L Rowe; Sweta Sharma; Gang Wu; Chunhua Yan; Hongen Zhang; Young-Hwa Chung; Jeong A Kim; Neung Hwa Park; Il Han Song; Kenneth H Buetow
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Integrative Functional Genomics Implicates EPB41 Dysregulation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk.

Authors:  Xinyu Yang; Dianke Yu; Yanli Ren; Jinyu Wei; Wenting Pan; Changchun Zhou; Liqing Zhou; Yu Liu; Ming Yang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Association of a functional RAD52 genetic variant locating in a miRNA binding site with risk of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ziqiang Li; Yuan Guo; Liqing Zhou; Yunxia Ge; Lili Wei; Lichao Li; Changchun Zhou; Jinyu Wei; Qipeng Yuan; Jie Li; Ming Yang
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 7.  Prolonged autophagy by MTOR inhibitor leads radioresistant cancer cells into senescence.

Authors:  Hae Yun Nam; Myung Woul Han; Hyo Won Chang; Sang Yoon Kim; Seong Who Kim
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 16.016

8.  Down-regulation of 5S rRNA by miR-150 and miR-383 enhances c-Myc-rpL11 interaction and inhibits proliferation of esophageal squamous carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Xinyu Wang; Yanli Ren; Zhiqiong Wang; Xiangyu Xiong; Sichong Han; Wenting Pan; Hongwei Chen; Liqing Zhou; Changchun Zhou; Qipeng Yuan; Ming Yang
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Overexpression of the novel senescence marker β-galactosidase (GLB1) in prostate cancer predicts reduced PSA recurrence.

Authors:  Jennifer Wagner; Nathan Damaschke; Bing Yang; Matthew Truong; Chad Guenther; Johnathon McCormick; Wei Huang; David Jarrard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  MiRNA-192 [corrected] and miRNA-204 Directly Suppress lncRNA HOTTIP and Interrupt GLS1-Mediated Glutaminolysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yunxia Ge; Xiaodan Yan; Yiguang Jin; Xinyu Yang; Xiang Yu; Liqing Zhou; Sichong Han; Qipeng Yuan; Ming Yang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, screening, and assessment of hepatic reserve.

Authors:  S Z Frager; J M Schwartz
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Viral hepatitis and liver cancer.

Authors:  Marc Ringelhan; Jane A McKeating; Ulrike Protzer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.