Literature DB >> 27487526

Effects of Romosozumab Compared With Teriparatide on Bone Density and Mass at the Spine and Hip in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass.

Harry K Genant1,2, Klaus Engelke3,4, Michael A Bolognese5, Carlos Mautalen6, Jacques P Brown7, Chris Recknor8, Stefan Goemaere9, Thomas Fuerst10, Yu-Ching Yang11, Andreas Grauer11, Cesar Libanati12.   

Abstract

Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds sclerostin, has a dual effect on bone by increasing bone formation and reducing bone resorption, and thus has favorable effects in both aspects of bone volume regulation. In a phase 2 study, romosozumab increased areal BMD at the lumbar spine and total hip as measured by DXA compared with placebo, alendronate, and teriparatide in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. In additional analyses from this international, randomized study, we now describe the effect of romosozumab on lumbar spine and hip volumetric BMD (vBMD) and BMC at month 12 as assessed by QCT in the subset of participants receiving placebo, s.c. teriparatide (20 µg once daily), and s.c. romosozumab (210 mg once monthly). QCT measurements were performed at the lumbar spine (mean of L1 and L2 entire vertebral bodies, excluding posterior processes) and hip. One year of treatment with romosozumab significantly increased integral vBMD and BMC at the lumbar spine and total hip from baseline, and compared with placebo and teriparatide (all p < 0.05). Trabecular vertebral vBMD improved significantly and similarly from baseline (p < 0.05) with both romosozumab (18.3%) and teriparatide (20.1%), whereas cortical vertebral vBMD gains were larger with romosozumab compared with teriparatide (13.7% versus 5.7%, p < 0.0001). Trabecular hip vBMD gains were significantly larger with romosozumab than with teriparatide (10.8% versus 4.2%, p = 0.01), but were similar for cortical vBMD (1.1% versus -0.9%, p = 0.12). Cortical BMC gains were larger with romosozumab compared with teriparatide at both the spine (23.3% versus 10.9%, p < 0.0001) and hip (3.4% versus 0.0%, p = 0.03). These improvements are expected to result in strength gains and support the continued clinical investigation of romosozumab as a potential therapy to rapidly reduce fracture risk in ongoing phase 3 studies.
© 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANABOLICS; BONE QCT; CLINICAL TRIALS; OSTEOPOROSIS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27487526     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  38 in total

Review 1.  Current Status of Bone-Forming Therapies for the Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Koldkjær Sølling; Torben Harsløf; Bente Langdahl
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Combination denosumab and high dose teriparatide for postmenopausal osteoporosis (DATA-HD): a randomised, controlled phase 4 trial.

Authors:  Joy N Tsai; Hang Lee; Natalie L David; Richard Eastell; Benjamin Z Leder
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 32.069

Review 4.  The clinical potential of romosozumab for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Koldkjær Sølling; Torben Harsløf; Bente Langdahl
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 5.  Pediatric Osteoporosis: Diagnosis and Treatment Considerations.

Authors:  Edoardo Marrani; Teresa Giani; Gabriele Simonini; Rolando Cimaz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  New anabolic therapies for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Salvatore Minisola; Cristiana Cipriani; Marco Occhiuto; Jessica Pepe
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.397

7.  N-cadherin Regulation of Bone Growth and Homeostasis Is Osteolineage Stage-Specific.

Authors:  Francesca Fontana; Cynthia L Hickman-Brecks; Valerie S Salazar; Leila Revollo; Grazia Abou-Ezzi; Susan K Grimston; Sung Yeop Jeong; Marcus Watkins; Manuela Fortunato; Yael Alippe; Daniel C Link; Gabriel Mbalaviele; Roberto Civitelli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Teriparatide treatment exerts differential effects on the central and peripheral skeleton: results from the MOAT study.

Authors:  M A Paggiosi; L Yang; D Blackwell; J S Walsh; E McCloskey; N Peel; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Inhibiting the osteocyte-specific protein sclerostin increases bone mass and fracture resistance in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Michelle M McDonald; Michaela R Reagan; Scott E Youlten; Sindhu T Mohanty; Anja Seckinger; Rachael L Terry; Jessica A Pettitt; Marija K Simic; Tegan L Cheng; Alyson Morse; Lawrence M T Le; David Abi-Hanna; Ina Kramer; Carolyne Falank; Heather Fairfield; Irene M Ghobrial; Paul A Baldock; David G Little; Michaela Kneissel; Karin Vanderkerken; J H Duncan Bassett; Graham R Williams; Babatunde O Oyajobi; Dirk Hose; Tri G Phan; Peter I Croucher
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Novel anabolic treatments for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ernesto Canalis
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.