Due to the presence of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in tissues and its specific influence on white adipose tissue, fat cells are possible targets of pharmacological RAS blockers commonly used as anti-hypertensive drugs. In the present study, we investigated the effects of different RAS blockers on fat cell metabolism, more specifically on lipolysis, lipogenesis and oxidation of energy substrates. Isolated primary adipocytes were incubated with different RAS blockers (aliskiren, captopril and losartan) in vitro for 24 h and lipolysis, lipogenesis and glucose oxidation capacities were determined in dose-response assays to a β-adrenergic agonist and to insulin. Although no change was found in lipolytic capacity, the RAS blockers modulated lipogenesis and glucose oxidation in a different way. While captopril decreased insulin-stimulated lipogenesis (-19% of maximal response and -60% of insulin responsiveness) due to reduced glucose derived glycerol synthesis (-19% of maximal response and 64% of insulin responsiveness), aliskiren increased insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation (+49% of maximal response and +292% of insulin responsiveness) in fat cells. Our experiments demonstrate that RAS blockers can differentially induce metabolic alterations in adipocyte metabolism, characterized by a reduction in lipogenic responsiveness or an increase in glucose oxidation. The impact of RAS blockers on adipocyte metabolism may have beneficial implications on metabolic disorders during their therapeutic use in hypertensive patients.
Due to the presence of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in tissues and its specific influence on white adipose tissue, fat cells are possible targets of pharmacological RAS blockers commonly used as anti-hypertensive drugs. In the present study, we investigated the effects of different RAS blockers on fat cell metabolism, more specifically on lipolysis, lipogenesis and oxidation of energy substrates. Isolated primary adipocytes were incubated with different RAS blockers (aliskiren, captopril and losartan) in vitro for 24 h and lipolysis, lipogenesis and glucose oxidation capacities were determined in dose-response assays to a β-adrenergic agonist and to insulin. Although no change was found in lipolytic capacity, the RAS blockers modulated lipogenesis and glucose oxidation in a different way. While captopril decreased insulin-stimulated lipogenesis (-19% of maximal response and -60% of insulin responsiveness) due to reduced glucose derived glycerol synthesis (-19% of maximal response and 64% of insulin responsiveness), aliskiren increased insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation (+49% of maximal response and +292% of insulin responsiveness) in fat cells. Our experiments demonstrate that RAS blockers can differentially induce metabolic alterations in adipocyte metabolism, characterized by a reduction in lipogenic responsiveness or an increase in glucose oxidation. The impact of RAS blockers on adipocyte metabolism may have beneficial implications on metabolic disorders during their therapeutic use in hypertensivepatients.
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is recognized as an important regulator of blood
pressure and has profound influence on hydroelectrolytic homeostasis, and
pharmacological blockers of RAS are significant tools in the treatment of hypertension.
Although RAS blockers are not used for preventing metabolic dysfunctions in humans, data
from animal models indicates that they have potential beneficial effects in obesity and
diabetes (1
–7).Components of the RAS have been detected in many metabolically active tissues (such as
muscle, adipose tissue, liver, and pancreas). Due to the presence of the RAS, these
tissues might be targets for RAS blockers (8).
Adipose tissue, which metabolism and endocrine functions are intensively involved in
metabolic diseases, is especially important. Adipocytes express all the components of
the RAS, including the initial substrate angiotensinogen, as well as all the enzymes
required for its conversion to angiotensins and main angiotensin receptors. Adipose RAS
expression is also known to be exacerbated during obesity (9).Some effects of RAS blockers in adipocytes have already been described, such as the
stimulation of adipogenesis (10,11) and modulation of endocrine properties (12,13). On
the other hand, as far as we know, investigations of possible effects of RAS blockers on
metabolic pathways of fat cells are lacking.Since adipocyte metabolism greatly influences cell size and, consequently, weight
management, this study aimed to investigate the possible direct effects of different RAS
blockers on the main metabolic pathways of fat cells (lipolysis, lipogenesis and energy
substrate oxidation).
Material and Methods
Fat cells isolation
The Ethical Committee for Animal Research of the Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas,
Universidade de São Paulo approved the experimental procedures (#022.125.02). Twenty
three male Wistar rats (8-9 weeks old, 200–250 g) from the Animal Resource Center of
this institute were used in the experiments. All animals were pre-anesthetized with
sodium thiopental (4 mg/100 g body weight) and decapitated. A periepididymal fat pad
(1 g) was excised and minced to small pieces with scissors, and digested at 37°C in
EHB buffer [Earles' salts, 25 mM HEPES (N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic
acid) and 4% bovineserum albumin (BSA)], pH 7.4, containing collagenase type I (1.25
mg/mL) from Worthington Biochemical Corporation (USA). Fat cells were then isolated
according to Rodbell (14). Cell size and
number were determined as previously described (15).
Fat cells RAS blockers treatment
Briefly, about 3.5×106 fat cells were maintained in DMEM (low glucose),
fetal bovine serum (1%), penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL). Cells were
left untreated or were treated for 24 h with 1-µM of the following RAS blockers: the
renin inhibitor aliskiren (Aliskiren Hemifumarate, Novartis, Italy), the ACE
inhibitor captopril (Sigma, USA) and the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan
(losartan potassium, Sigma-Fluka, USA). The dose was previously defined as non-toxic
by a cell viability assay (Cell Proliferation Kit II-XTT, Roche; Supplementary Figure
S1), and was above the IC50 for aliskiren (0.6 nM) (16) and captopril (0.021 µM) (17), and the same for losartan as successfully used in Murali et al.
(18) to suppress ANG II action in
vitro. Treatment did not exceed 24 h in order to prevent cell lysis,
commonly seen in fresh isolated fat cells after longer incubations, and ensure good
viability during the metabolic assays. Treated cells were then washed, suspended in
60% EHB buffer and used in the metabolic assays described below. Each assay was
repeated twice and one animal represents one experimental unit (n=1).
Measurement of lipolysis
First, 40-μL aliquots of cell suspension were transferred to microtubes (0.6 mL) and
incubated in EHB buffer containing 5 mM of glucose and 0.2 mM adenosine for 30 min at
37°C, to inhibit lipolysis through G protein-coupled receptors and estimate the
non-specific glycerol release. Next, 20 μL of adenosine deaminase (0.2 U/mL in EHB
buffer, pH 7.45) from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) was added for 30 min at 37°C, to allow
adenosine to degrade. Then, aliquots of fat cells were incubated for 60 min at 37°C
with a β-adrenergic agonist ([−]-isoproterenol [+]-bitartrate salt, from
Sigma-Aldrich) in increasing concentrations, to produce a dose-response curve.The final volume was 200 μL. Reaction was stopped by transferring the tubes to an ice
bath, followed by centrifugation at 5200 g for 5 min at 4°C to
isolate the cells in the reaction medium. Glycerol release was determined using an
enzymatic-colorimetric method (Free glycerol determination kit, Sigma-Aldrich) and
used as an index of lipolysis rate. The results are reported in nmol·106
cells-1·h-1.
Measurement of lipogenesis
Briefly, aliquots (25 μL) of cell suspension (∼7.5×104 cells) were
transferred to polypropylene test tubes containing 5 μL (1850 Bq/tube) of
D-[U-14C]-glucose (Amersham Biosciences GE Health Care, UK) and 450-μL
aliquots of Krebs/Ringer/phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, with 1% BSA and 1 mM of glucose,
at 37°C (previously saturated with a CO2 (5%)/O2 (95%) gas
mixture) and assayed in the presence of increasing insulin concentrations
(dose-response curve), until final concentrations of 25 nM. These samples were then
incubated in a final volume of 500 μL for 60 min at 37°C in a water bath. The tubes
had a rubber stopper, and the air inside was enriched with CO2
(5%)/O2 (95%) to preserve the buffer assay from pH oscillations. At the
end of incubation, the final reaction mixture was treated with 2.5 mL Dole's reagent
(isopropanol:n-heptane:H2SO4, 4:1:0.25) for
cell lipid extraction. This mixture was vigorously agitated (three times) in vortex
and decanted. From the upper (heptane) layer, 500 μL were transferred to
scintillation vials and the radioactivity (from D-[U-14C]-glucose)
incorporated into lipid extract was measured in a β-counter (1450 MicroBeta TriLux,
PerkinElmer, USA). The results were reported in nmol·106
cells-1·h-1.
Measurement of fatty acids and glycerol synthesis
Another aliquot (500 µL) of the lipid extraction described above was dried out
naturally after a few days of rest and incubated for 60 min in 60°C with 95% ethanol
as solvent (1:1) and 40% KOH to hydrolyze the ester bounds of triacylglycerol (TAG)
and separate fatty acids and glycerol. Lipid extraction of this mixture was done
using Dole's reagent and processed as described above. The radioactivity incorporated
in the fatty acid moiety was measured and glycerol moiety radioactivity was
calculated as the difference between TAG and fatty acids values. The results are
reported in nmol·106 cells-1·h-1.
Measurement of glucose oxidation
For this measurement, the same lipogenesis assay was done. At the end of incubation,
200 µL of H2SO4 8 N was added in each assay tube, quickly
followed by the capping of the assay tube with a scintillation vial containing a
filter paper (4×2 cm) embedded with ethanolamine (200 µL). The assembled tubes were
sealed with parafilm paper and incubated for 30 min at 37°C to adsorb the
14CO2 released from D-[U-14C]-glucose oxidation.
The radioactivity was determined in a β-counter and results are reported in
nmol·106 cells-1·h-1.
Statistical analysis
The insulin or isoproterenol dose-response curves were obtained from a nonlinear
regression [log (agonist) vs response] using the Graphpad Prism 5
software (USA). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for interactions
between factors in dose-response data. To compare differences between drug
treatments, data from basal and insulin or isoproterenol-stimulated states were
analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc tests
(*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001). Data are reported as means±SE.
Results
RAS blockers had no effects on lipolytic rates of isolated fat cells
Glycerol release from fat cells was evaluated as a marker of lipolytic rates during
basal and isoproterenol-stimulated conditions (Figure
1). No effects were found after 24 h treatment with the RAS blockers.
Figure 1
Lipolytic capacity of isolated fat cells previously treated with
renin-angiotensin system blockers (A) aliskiren,
(B) captopril and (C) losartan. Cells were
incubated with increasing concentrations of isoproterenol for 60 min at 37°C
and glycerol released in the medium was determined. There were no significant
differences between treatments. D, basal and 1 µM
isoproterenol stimulated lipolysis. Data are reported as the mean±SE (n=6).
#P<0.001 in basal vs 1 µM isoproterenol
(two-way ANOVA).
ACE inhibitor captopril decreased insulin-stimulated lipogenesis of isolated fat
cells
Lipid incorporation of D-[U-14C]-glucose was evaluated as a marker of
lipogenic rates in basal and insulin-stimulated conditions. Cells treated with the
ACE inhibitor captopril caused a rightward shift in the insulin-stimulated lipogenic
rates in the dose-response study (Figure 2B).
With 10 nM of insulin, a significantly decreased response was observed (Figure 2D), compared to the values reached by
adipocytes in the control group. The other RAS blockers (renin inhibitor aliskiren
and AT1 receptor antagonist losartan) did not cause any effect compared to control
cells (Figure 2A, C and D). When
14C-glucose incorporation was analyzed separately in fatty acids and
glycerol moieties after TAG hydrolysis we found that the decrease of glucose
incorporation was not due to a reduction in fatty acids (Figure 3B) but in glycerol generation from glucose (Figure 4B).
Figure 2
Lipid glucose incorporation of isolated fat cells previously treated with
renin-angiotensin system blockers (A) aliskiren,
(B) captopril and (C) losartan. Cells were
incubated with increasing concentrations of insulin for 60 min at 37°C.
D-(U-14C)-glucose (0.05 μCi/tube) was added to the incubation
medium at the beginning of the test. At the end, adipocyte lipid content was
extracted, and the radioactivity incorporated in TAG was determined.
D, basal and 10 nM insulin-stimulated lipogenesis.
*P<0.05 captopril vs control in 10 nM insulin-stimulated
state. There was also significant lipogenic stimulus (#P<0.001
for basal vs 10 nM insulin). Data are reported as the mean±SE
(n=6). Two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni's post hoc tests were
used.
Figure 3
Fatty acids glucose incorporation of isolated fat cells previously treated
with renin-angiotensin system blockers (A) aliskiren,
(B) captopril and (C) losartan. There were
no significant differences between treatments. Cells were incubated with
increasing concentrations of insulin for 60 min at 37°C.
D-[U-14C]-glucose (0.05 μCi/tube) was added to the incubation medium
at the beginning of the test. At the end, adipocyte lipid content was
extracted, and the radioactivity incorporated in fatty acids was determined.
D, basal and 10 nM insulin-stimulated lipogenesis
(#P<0.001 for basal vs 10 nM insulin) Data
are reported as the mean±SE (n=6). Two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni's
post hoc tests were used.
Figure 4
Glycerol glucose incorporation of isolated fat cells previously treated
with renin-angiotensin system blockers (A) aliskiren,
(B) captopril and (C) losartan. Cells were
incubated with increasing concentrations of insulin for 60 min at 37°C.
D-[U-14C]-glucose (0.05 μCi/tube) was added to the incubation
medium at the beginning of the test. At the end, adipocyte lipid content was
extracted, and the radioactivity incorporated in glycerol was determined.
D, basal and 10 nM insulin-stimulated lipogenesis.
*P<0.05 captopril vs control, in 10 nM insulin-stimulated
state. There was also significant lipogenic stimulus (#P<0.001
for basal vs 10 nM insulin). Data are reported as the mean±SE
(n=6). Two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni's post hoc tests were
used.
The 14CO2 production was measured as a marker of
D-(U-14C)-glucose oxidation rates in basal and insulin-stimulated
conditions. Cells treated with aliskiren increased glucose oxidation rates of
insulin-stimulated cells, particularly at 10 nM of insulin (Figure 5A and D), when the carbon dioxide production increased
approximately 50% compared to non-treated control cells and insulin responsiveness
increased approximately three times. The other RAS blockers tested, captopril and
losartan, were ineffective (Figure 5B and
C).
Figure 5
Glucose oxidation of isolated fat cells previously treated with
renin-angiotensin system blockers (A) aliskiren,
(B) captopril and (C) losartan were
incubated with increasing concentrations of insulin for 60 min at 37°C.
D-[U-14C]-glucose (0.05 μCi/tube) was added to the incubation
medium at the beginning of the test. At the end, 14CO2
was collected, and the radioactivity was determined. D, basal
and 10 nM insulin-stimulated oxidation. *P<0.05 aliskiren
vs control in 10 nM insulin-stimulated state. There was
also significant insulin glucose oxidation stimulus (#P<0.001 for
basal vs 10 nM insulin). Data are reported as the mean±SE
(n=6). Two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni's post hoc tests were
used.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that the main metabolic aspects of fat cell function can
be modulated by RAS blockers. To become hypertrophic, adipocytes need to store more
energy substrates than they can mobilize or use (19).Through lipolysis, fatty acids and glycerol are released from intracellular fat droplets
in adipocytes through TAG hydrolysis (20). Some
RAS products have been already associated with lipolysis activation. For example, acute
exposure to ANG II decreases the spontaneous lipolytic rates in isolated human
adipocytes, and the presence of AT1 receptor blocker losartan abolishes this effect,
evidencing the importance of the AT1 receptor on the regulation of this process (21). On the other hand, acute exposure to ANG 1–7
increases lipolysis in isolated rat adipocytes, both in a spontaneously unstimulated and
in a cathecolamine-stimulated situation, an effect that depends on the MAS receptor
activation (6). However, in our study, we did not
observe any degree of modulation upon lipolysis. In fact, in previous studies, the
lipolytic effect of angiotensins was obtained at very high concentrations of ANG II and
ANG 1-7 (6,21). Human studies with ANG II infusion at pressor-effective doses (i.e.,
within its biological range) did not demonstrate any significant alteration in lipolytic
activity (22). Based on our model of lipolysis,
the in vitro production of angiotensin by isolated fat cells did not
demonstrate relevant effects of RAS blockers on lipolytic activity.On the other hand, although no effect was found in the first metabolic pathway studied,
a second series of experiments revealed relevant actions of RAS blockers in the
lipogenic assay. Through lipogenesis, fat cells can synthesize and store lipids,
particularly TAG, which is composed of three fatty acids and one glycerol molecule
(20). Adipocytes treated with captopril did
not normally respond to insulin, showing a lower lipogenic capacity, which was recovered
only in the presence of an extremely high dose of insulin (25 nM). In addition, we
observed that the intense decrease in lipogenesis induced by captopril was due to a
limitation in the pathway toward glycerol synthesis, while no influence was found in
fatty acids synthesis.There are two main pathways through which glycerol can be synthesized: from glucose
during glycolysis; and from glucose metabolites (mainly lactate and pyruvate) through
glyceroneogenesis. In the first case, glucose is diverted from the initial phase of
glycolysis, when dihydroxyacetone phosphate is converted into glycerol-3-phosphate by
glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. In glyceroneogenesis, the pyruvate generated from
glycolysis is then redirected back to dihydroxyacetone phosphate through the action of
phosphoenol pyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) (20).
Although PEPCK is mostly recognized as a liver gluconeogenic enzyme, its concentration
in fat cells is similar as in the liver. However, adipocytes do not perform
gluconeogenesis due to the lack of the two terminal enzymes which allow the
reconstitution and release of glucose (23). On
the other hand, this pathway is important in the production of glycerol-3-phosphate in
fat cells. Indeed, glyceroneogenesis has been accounted for approximately 90% of
triglycerideglycerol synthesis in rat adipose tissue (24), which reinforces our hypothesis that changes in this pathway can
strongly alter glycerol synthesis in fat cells.Considering all the above information and that captopril treatment decreased glycerol
synthesis but did not alter fatty acid synthesis and glucose oxidation, we can presume
that glucose, the main source of the glycerol moiety in TAG, was limited by a decreased
glyceroneogenesis. In a diet-induced obesity model in mice, the treatment with ACE
inhibitor prevented PEPCK increase in the liver while no effects occurred with other RAS
blockers, such as aliskiren and losartan, which indicates a possible relationship
between ACE inhibitors and PEPCK-related pathways, as glyceroneogenesis in adipose cells
(25).As a whole, these results help to clarify the metabolic pattern that leads to weight
loss in in vivo studies with ACE inhibitors (3,5
–7), and a
possible role of ACE in weight regulation (26).
Likewise, renin inhibition has also been associated with weight loss and metabolic
benefits in type II diabetic (4) and diet-induced
obesity models (2).Here, aliskiren did not induce changes in the lipolytic or lipogenic capacities, which
are the main metabolic pathways that control intracellular TAG content. Nevertheless,
the renin inhibitor increased adipocytes capability of glucose oxidation in response to
insulin, which can reflect an increase in mitochondrial function. Since impaired
mitochondrial function of adipocytes occurs during the development of obesity linked to
metabolic diseases, such as diabetes and insulin resistance in humans (27,28) and
experimental animal models (29), our data endorse
recent findings of increased metabolic activity of adipose cells in adipose-specific
angiotensinogen inactivation (30). Furthermore,
aliskiren treatment has shown to increase the Uncoupling Protein 1 (UCP-1), an important
mitochondrial protein in white adipose tissue of type 2 diabetic KK-A(y) mice (4), which also increases mitochondrial function and
energy substrates oxidation. In our experiment, we also tested whether aliskiren
increases UCP-1 gene expression through real time quantitative PCR, but the result was
negative (Supplementary Figure S2).Although the tested drugs in this research showed the capacity to interfere with the
RAS, a discrepancy between RAS blockers on fat cells metabolic response was found. The
different effects may be explained by the drugs interference in the different steps of
RAS. While aliskiren decreases the synthesis of all angiotensins (as ANG I, II, 1–7),
captopril decreases only ANG II formation while it increases ANG 1–7 synthesis through
the renin/ACE 2 axis (31). While ANG II is
associated with obesity, oxidative stress and insulin resistance, ACE 2/ANG 1–7 axis has
emerged as a beneficial antagonist of ACE/ANG II axis, which improves systemic insulin
sensitivity, glucose homeostasis and body weight (32). Furthermore, ACE inhibitors can also increase bradykinin formation
(31), which is emerging as another adipose
tissue metabolically active peptide that decreases propensity to obesity (33).Among the RAS blockers tested, only losartan treatment did not induce modulations in any
metabolic pathway. The losartan dose tested had been successfully used in another
in vitro study to suppress ANG II action (18). Indeed, AT1 receptors blockers become relevant only during
concomitant high doses of ANG II incubation (21).
Besides, although some AT1 antagonists are agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor γ (PPARγ), losartan is not recognized as a potent one (34). In 3T3-L1 adipocytes, losartan has a PPARγ agonism effect only
in high concentrations (from 10 to 100 µM) (35).
This possible effect of PPARγ agonism also exists in other RAS blockers (enalapril,
irbesartan, telmisartan) and should be especially considered in studies where
comparisons are carried out within the same step of the RAS blockade. The action
demonstrated by the drugs tested herein had not yet been reported. Since PPARγ
activation has an important effect in adipose tissue metabolism, the utilization of
other RAS blockers, including blockers of the same step, might induce different
results.Comparisons between the action of other RAS blockers, either of the same or from
different metabolic pathways, need to be done. This aspect is a limitation of our
work.In conclusion, our experiments demonstrated that RAS blockers can induce metabolic
alterations in fat cells metabolism, which can help to explain the beneficial effects in
obesity and weight loss in animal studies. Fat cells treated with the ACE inhibitor
captopril had a limited lipogenic response to insulin, decreasing glycerol synthesis
from glucose. In turn, adipocytes treated with the renin inhibitor aliskiren exhibited
increased glucose oxidation in response to insulin. Drug-specific studies are
encouraged, as different RAS blockers have different actions in adipocytes metabolism.
Finally, the effects of RAS blockers on adipocyte metabolism may have beneficial
implications on metabolic disorders during their therapeutic use in hypertensivepatients, although the in vivo effects need to be further
elucidated.
Authors: Michael Schupp; Lucas D Lee; Nikolaj Frost; Sumaira Umbreen; Boris Schmidt; Thomas Unger; Ulrich Kintscher Journal: Hypertension Date: 2005-12-19 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: H-J Choo; J-H Kim; O-B Kwon; C S Lee; J Y Mun; S S Han; Y-S Yoon; G Yoon; K-M Choi; Y-G Ko Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2006-02-25 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Annette D de Kloet; Eric G Krause; Dong-Hoon Kim; Randall R Sakai; Randy J Seeley; Stephen C Woods Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2009-06-04 Impact factor: 4.736