Literature DB >> 27485513

Prevalence of pathogenic free-living amoeba and other protozoa in natural and communal piped tap water from Queen Elizabeth protected area, Uganda.

Celsus Sente1, Joseph Erume2, Irene Naigaga3, Julius Mulindwa2,4, Sylvester Ochwo2, Phillip Kimuda Magambo2, Benigna Gabriela Namara5, Charles Drago Kato2, George Sebyatika2,6, Kevin Muwonge2,6, Michael Ocaido3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pathogenic water dwelling protozoa such as Acanthamoeba spp., Hartmannella spp., Naegleria spp., Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. are often responsible for devastating illnesses especially in children and immunocompromised individuals, yet their presence and prevalence in certain environment in sub-Saharan Africa is still unknown to most researchers, public health officials and medical practitioners. The objective of this study was to establish the presence and prevalence of pathogenic free-living amoeba (FLA), Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Queen Elizabeth Protected Area (QEPA).
METHODS: Samples were collected from communal taps and natural water sites in QEPA. Physical water parameters were measured in situ. The samples were processed to detect the presence of FLA trophozoites by xenic cultivation, Cryptosporidium oocysts by Ziehl-Neelsen stain and Giardia cysts by Zinc Sulphate floatation technique. Parasites were observed microscopically, identified, counted and recorded. For FLA, genomic DNA was extracted for amplification and sequencing.
RESULTS: Both natural and tap water sources were contaminated with FLA, Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. All protozoan parasites were more abundant in the colder rainy season except for Harmannella spp. and Naegleria spp. which occurred more in the warmer months. The prevalence of all parasites was higher in tap water than in natural water samples. There was a strong negative correlation between the presence of Acanthamoeba spp., Hartmannella spp., Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. with Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (P < 0.05). The presence of Cryptosporidium spp. showed a significant positive correlation (P < 0.05) with conductivity, pH and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS); whereas the presence of Giardia spp. had only a strong positive correlation with TDS. Molecular genotyping of FLA produced 7 Acanthamoeba, 5 Echinamoeba, 2 Hartmannella, 1 Bodomorpha, 1 Nuclearia and 1 Cercomonas partial sequences.
CONCLUSIONS: All water collection sites were found to be contaminated with pathogenic protozoa that could possibly be the cause of a number of silent morbidities and mortalities among rural households in QEPA. This implies that water used by communities in QEPA is of poor quality and predisposes them to a variety of protozoan infections including the FLA whose public health importance was never reported, thus necessitating adoption of proper water safety measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Free-living; Prevalence; Protozoa; Queen Elizabeth; Uganda; Water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27485513      PMCID: PMC4971666          DOI: 10.1186/s40249-016-0162-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty        ISSN: 2049-9957            Impact factor:   4.520


Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file 1 for translations of the abstract into the five official working languages of the United Nations.

Background

The factors that contribute to the emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases originate from changes in the ecosystems; such as ecosystem variations of natural or anthropogenic origin with climatic and geographic influences on pathogens and vectors, or changes in the microbes themselves, or their host spectrum [1, 2]. Such changes in the ecosystem could be the cause of the emergence of infections such as Zika, Ebola, Marburg, Influenza and West Nile viruses as well as protozoan and other parasitic infections. Pathogenic waterborne protozoan parasites such as Acanthamoeba, Hartmannella, Naegleria, Cryptosporidium and Giardia are typically associated with poor and often marginalised communities, as observed mostly by studies done in America, Asia, Europe and the Middle East [3-5]. Lack of adequate information about waterborne parasites in sub-Saharan Africa especially on FLA has compelled the present study. In many rural African households, untreated water is used for various purposes such as bathing, cooking, drinking and swimming, often exposing them to waterborne parasitic infections [3, 5]. More than 300 million people in sub-Saharan Africa have poor access to safe water, predisposing them to a number of infections directly or indirectly, the commonest being diarrhoeal infections which have been reported to be the second leading cause of death in children under 5 years [3, 6]. The commonly studied waterborne pathogens in poor rural households are those associated with typhoid, dysentery, cholera, hepatitis E and rotavirus in children and immunocompromised individuals [7-10]. Other waterborne parasites such as pathogenic free-living amoeba (FLA) that may cause severe health effects in humans and animals have not been widely studied in developing countries. However, they have been studied more in developed countries and are known to be associated with severe infections in humans [5]. In sub-Saharan Africa, due to lack of information, more studies are needed to establish the health importance of FLA [5]. Pathogenic FLA such as Acanthamoeba spp., Hartmanella vermiformis, Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria spp. and Vahlkampfia avara are aerobic eukaryotic protists that can potentially cause infections in humans and animals [7]. They have been implicated in infections of the central nervous system, eye, nose and skin. Most pathogenic FLA are known to facilitate intracellular multiplication of Legionella pneumophila, Vibrio cholerae, Bacillus anthracis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis which are responsible for legionellosis, cholera, anthrax and tuberculosis, respectively [11, 12]. Acanthamoeba has been reported as a causative agent of granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE), a fatal disease of the CNS and amoebic keratitis (AK), a painful sight-threatening disease of the eyes [11]. It has also been associated with cutaneous lesions and sinusitis in HIV/AIDS patients and other immunocompromised individuals [13]. A case of mixed keratitis infection has been reported due to Acanthamoeba spp. and thermotolerant H. vermiformis [14]. Hartmannella like Acanthamoeba is also a host of a number of human bacterial organisms such as Legionella pneumophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [15, 16]. Naegleria fowleri, N. australiensis and N. italica are associated with acute, fulminant, necrotizing and hemorrhagic primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM) that often causes death in children and adults with a history of recent contact with fresh water [7]. Other FLA such as Cercozoa (Cercomonadida, Thaumatomonadida, Euglyphida, Desmothoracida, Gromiidae, Phaeodarea), Platymoeba and Echinamoeba (E. thermarum, E. exundans) have not yet been reported as pathogenic, but with ecosystem changes, climatic changes, geographic influences and mutations, they could as well cause infections in the near future. Over the past decade, Cryptosporidium and Giardia have emerged as major waterborne pathogens [17] whose transmission occurs as a result of water contamination with animal and human faeces. These infections are attributed to poor hygiene followed by lack of clean potable water resulting in cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis which are characterised by vomiting, chills, headache, fever, profuse diarrhoea, abdominal pain and cramping [18, 19]. C. parvum and G. lamblia can cause severe clinical infections in young individuals [20]. Infections caused by Cryptosporidium and Giardia pose a significant environmental and public health concern because of their tremendous ability to be transmitted from animal to animal and from animal to humans [20]. Free-living amoeba, Cryptosporidium and Giardia are parasites commonly found in natural water resources and piped water systems, however not much is known about their occurrence, prevalence and distribution in both rural and urban communities in Uganda.

Methods

Study area

The study was conducted in Queen Elizabeth Protected Area (QEPA), Uganda (Fig. 1). It is located at 00 12S, 30 00E (Latitude: 0.2000; Longitude: 30.0000) and is 1 978 sq. km in size. This Protected Area (PA) harbours Lakes George and Edward joined by the 40 km long Kazinga Channel. QEPA is a UNESCO ‘Man and Biosphere Reserve’ with 11 village enclaves, all with a fast growing population of humans whose main economic activities are fishing and livestock production. Their source of water is direct natural water from Kazinga channel, River Kyambura, Lake George and Lake Edward or untreated piped tap water channelled directly from the natural sources and stored in reservoir tanks before it is supplied to them.
Fig. 1

Map of the study area

Map of the study area

Sample collection, storage and transportation

The water sources considered were those from natural water sources and tap water systems. The sampling sites were purposively selected based on their benefit, convenience and importance to public health. They were based on certain landmarks that included the following: (1) along River Kyambura (R. Kyambura), (2) Kazinga channel banks (KCB), (3) Kazinga mid channel (KMC) (water in the middle of the channel), (4) Fish landing sites (FLS), and (5) Community piped tap water. Sampling was done within 1 year in the months of November, January, March, May, July and September. Important physical water parameters including; Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (mg/L), surface water temperature (°C), conductivity (μS/m), pH and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)(g/L) were determined in situ using a Multi-parameter water sensor (Greenspan, USA). A total number of 408 (324 natural water and 84 tap water) water samples were collected using 50 ml sterile polypropylene falcon tubes (Falcon® Centrifuge Tubes, Discovery Labware, USA). All samples were stored at room temperature and transported to the Makerere University parasitology laboratory within 48 h.

Laboratory methods

Three methods were used for parasite detection. Culture in non-nutritive media for FLA, Modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining for Cryptosporidium and the Zinc Sulphate flotation technique for Giardia cysts. For the FLA positive samples, DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing were carried out.

Sample processing and growth in xenic cultures

The non-nutritive medium (Page Amoeba Saline solution of 2.5 mM NaCl, 1 mM KH2PO4, 0.5 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM CaCl2 and 20 mM MgSO4) was seeded with 0.1 ml of a heat inactivated 48-h culture of E. coli BL2 [21]. Water samples collected in the 50 ml tubes were centrifuged at 1 000 × g for 15 min and supernatant poured off to expose the pellets. Using sterile Pasteur pipettes, the pellets were removed from all the tubes and carefully spread on pre-seeded NNA-EI agar plates. The plates were incubated at 32 °C overnight. The following day each plate was sealed with a plastic film and incubated upside down at 32 °C up to 7 days. After 3 days of incubation, the plates were monitored for detection of FLA trophozoites until the 7th day using an inverted microscope (Motic® AE2000 Binocular, TED PELLA Inc. USA). The number of FLA trophozoites were counted using a haemocytometer (MicrobeHunter, Germany) and recorded.

Modified Ziehl-Neelsen carbol fuchsin staining for cryptosporidium

To maximise recovery of oocysts, the samples were centrifuged at 1 000 × g for 10 min to concentrate the oocysts. A modified Ziehl-Neelsen’s (ZN) carbol-fuchsin stain [18] was used to identify the oocysts of Cryptosporidium spp. A few drops of water were placed on a slide and stained with ZN-carbol fuchsin stain for 2 min, rinsed with tap water, followed by rinsing with acid alcohol (3 % hydrochloric acid in 70 % ethanol) and subsequently with tap water again. The product was counterstained with Brilliant Green for 2 min before rinsing it with tap water. This was followed by air-drying the slide before viewing under a microscope.

Zinc sulphate floatation technique for Giardia

Zinc Sulphate floatation technique [22] was used to identify Giardia cysts. To maximise recovery of cysts, each water sample was concentrated by centrifugation at 1 000 × g for 1 min. The supernatant was poured off leaving a small pellet. A test tube was filled with Zinc Sulphate solution (33 % w/v, Specific gravity 1.18-1.2). An estimated 1-2 ml of the water was added to the test tube and stirred. The test tube was then filled to the brim with Zinc Sulphate solution. A grease-free cover slip was put on the full to the brim test tube and left for 15 min to give time for the cysts to float. After 15 min, the cover slip was carefully lifted off the test tube, placed face down on a microscope slide and viewed under a microscope to identify the cysts.

Identification and counting parasites at genus level

To determine the genus of each protozoan parasite, its movement and structural properties were examined [23]. Representatives trophozoites/(oo)cysts of FLA, Cryptosporidium and Giardia were counted using a haemocytometer (Bright-Line™, Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC, USA) and recorded.

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from only FLA culture positive plates by chemical lysis and purification with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol extraction method [24]. This involved adding 500 μl of STE buffer (0.1 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Trischloride, pH 8, 1 % SDS) and 10 μl proteinase K (10 mg/ml) directly to each sample in Eppendorf tubes. The samples were incubated at 56 °C for one hour and then cooled before phenol extraction was started. Equal volumes of phenol-chloroform (521 μl) were added to the samples, mixed by vortexing and centrifuged at maximum speed (13 200 rpm) for 10 min. The aqueous layers from each tube were recovered and transferred to new Eppendorf tubes. This step was repeated to make two phenol-chloroform extractions. The aqueous layers were subjected to another chloroform extraction, recovered by centrifugation and transferred to new Eppendorf tubes, after which 1 000 μl of absolute alcohol (96-100 %) was added to each sample. The samples were then put in a freezer at -80 °C for precipitation overnight. The next day, samples were removed from the freezer and centrifuged at 13 200 rpm for 30 min. Absolute alcohol was poured off. The pellet in each tube was then washed with 1 000 μl of 70 % alcohol, centrifuged at 13 200 rpm for 15 min and alcohol poured off to expose the pellet. Finally, the pellet was air dried and dissolved in 50 μl of TE buffer.

DNA amplification

Amplification of the partial 18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) gene from FLA was performed using primer pairs JDP1/JDP2 and CRN5/1137 [25, 26]. The JDP1/JDP2 primer was specific to Acanthamoeba organisms whereas CRN5/1137 obtained amplimers from any eukaryote, aiding amplification of the 18S Ribosomal DNA gene from Hartmanella, Cercozoa, Bodomorpha, Echinamoeba and several other groups of FLA. Amplification reactions were performed using a DreamTaq PCR kit (Thermoscientific DreamTaq, USA). We used a 25 μl reaction volume containing 12.5 μl DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (2X), 0.5 μM forward primer, 0.5 μM reverse primers, 9 μl nuclease free water and 2.5 μl DNA template (50 pg concentration). The PCR was done under the following conditions: Initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min then 35 cycles with denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. A sample of 5 μl of each PCR reaction was screened for successful amplification on a 2.5 % (W/V) agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and run against 1 kb DNA ladder (Finnzymes, Finland). Electrophoresis was performed at 100 V of current and buffer used was 1 × TAE containing 0.5 μg/ml of ethidium bromide. Once enough electrophoretic separation was realised, the agarose gel was observed using a UV gel documentation system (Wagtec, UK). The gel images were captured and a soft copy stored.

Nucleic acid sequencing and analysis

The samples that showed the strongest positive bands between 400-600 bp with JDP1/JDP2, and 1-1 475 bp with CRN5/1137) were extracted from the gel and the DNA was purified using QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen Inc. Sample and Assay Technologies, Netherlands). The 18S rDNA segment from each of the FLA isolates was subjected to cycle sequencing using Dyenamic Terminator Cycle sequencing kit with JDP1/JDP2 and CRN5/1137 as sequencing primers [26]. The sequencing included 2 μl of PCR product, 5 × BigDye Buffer, and 2 pmol primer. Sequencing was done in 30 cycles with step 1 at 94 °C for 30 s, step 2 at 55 °C for 15 s and step 3 at 65 °C for 4 min. The sequence files were checked for quality and base trimming carried out using the Seqbuilder software (Dnastar, USA). For each of the nucleotide query sequences, a search for homologues in the NCBI database was carried out using the blastn tool. Homologues with query coverage >75 %, identity >70 % and low E values were considered. The molecular phylogenetic analysis was then completed by using the Maximum Likelihood Method in MEGA6 [27].

Statistical analysis

Data was analysed using IBM SPSS version 22. Numerical variables were summarised using mean and standard error of the mean (SEM). Univariate analysis to compare the prevalence of parasites across sampling sites was done using cross-tabulation with a Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Variables with a P-value of ≤ 0.05 were taken to be significant. Correlation analysis between environmental variables and waterborne parasite presence was done using Pearson correlation coefficient (r), a P-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Prevalence of the organisms

The water samples were collected during cold rainy (November, March & July) and cool dry (January, May & September) seasons. Overall, protozoan parasite prevalence was higher during the rainy season except for Hartmannella and Naegleria spp. that were higher in the dry season (Fig. 2). The prevalence and means (SEM) of the parasites from different sources are shown in Table 1. Both natural and tap water sources were contaminated with FLA, Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. The prevalence of all the parasites was higher in tap water, whereas as mean (SEM) was higher in natural water. The prevalence and mean of the parasites from the natural water sites were highest at KCB. The number of organisms isolated was significantly influenced by the sampling site.
Fig. 2

Overall seasonal prevalence of the protozoan parasites

Table 1

Waterborne parasite prevalence (%) and mean (SEM) per water source

ParasiteSources
Tap water (n = 84)Natural water (n = 324)R. Kyambura (n = 48)KCB (n = 84)FLS (n = 60)KCM (n = 132)
Acanthamoeba spp.(+)(%)36(43)107(33)19(39.6)51(60.7)30(50)7(5.3)
Mean(±SEM)2.26 ± 0.48.92 ± 1.62.23 ± 0.533.44 ± 0.493.08 ± 0.530.17 ± 0.08
Hartmannella spp.(+)(%)19(22.6)73(22.5)11(22.9)26(43.3)29(34.5)7 (5.3)
Mean(±SEM)1.20 ± 0.155.93 ± 0.921.19 ± 0.332.60 ± 0.372.4 ± 0.220.12 ± 0.1
Naegleria spp.(+)(%)12(14.3)43(13.3)17(20.2)12(25)6(10)8(6.1)
Mean(±SEM)0.5 ± 0.151.58 ± 0.60.5 ± 0.150.51 ± 0.140.43 ± 0.20.14 ± 0.1
Other FLA(+)(%)29(34.5)77(23.8)29(34.5)19(39.6)16(26.7)13(9.8)
Mean(±SEM)2.95 ± 0.406.2 ± 1.100.74 ± 0.162.95 ± 0.400.35 ± 0.110.5 ± 0.9
Cryptosporidium spp.(+)(%)34(40)22(26.2)14(29.2)62(73.8)28(46.7)30(22.7)
Mean(±SEM)45.24 ± 9.34416.77 ± 56.8837.50 ± 9.24223.81 ± 21.33101.67 ± 16.0353.79 ± 10.28
Giardia spp.(+)(%)32(38.1)117(36.1)12(25)32(53.3)38(45.2)35(26.5)
Mean(±SEM)83.33 ± 14.15425.52 ± 69.8243.75 ± 11.87152.38 ± 21.39148.33 ± 22.6181.06 ± 13.95
Overall seasonal prevalence of the protozoan parasites Waterborne parasite prevalence (%) and mean (SEM) per water source

Physical parameters

The means (SEM) of physical parameters are presented in Table 2. The mean DO (mg/L) from highest to lowest was as follows; KCM (4.56 ± 0.26), Tap water (4.08 ± 0.27), River Kyambura (4.03 ± 0.15), FLS (1.84 ± 0.21) and KCB (1.74 ± 0.15). All water sources had an alkaline condition (pH 7.99 ± 0.11- pH 9.31 ± 0.04) at 21.43 ± 0.14 (°C) - 5.76 ± 20 (°C). The mean TDS (g/L) was lowest at KCM with no significant difference at all the other points. Conductivity (μS/m) did not exhibit much difference.
Table 2

Physical parameters of different water sources

Water sourceDO(mg/L)pHTemp (°C)Conductivity (μS/m)TDS(g/L)
R. Kyambura4.03 ± 0.157.99 ± 0.1121.43 ± 0.14250.98 ± 3.02113.12 ± 6.42
KCB1.74 ± 0.159.31 ± 0.0425.63 ± 24273.71 ± 9.26182.76 ± 4.87
FLS1.84 ± 0.218.91 ± 0.1226.22 ± 33280.99 ± 10.36183.38 ± 6.83
KCM4.56 ± 0.269.19 ± 0.0725.76 ± 20261.74 ± 6.78105.09 ± 4.03
Tap water4.08 ± 0.277.73 ± 0.1025.52 ± 36263.26 ± 11.69173.94 ± 7.50

R. Kyambura River Kyambura

KCB Kazinga channel bank

KCM Kazinga channel mid

FLS Fish landing site

Physical parameters of different water sources R. Kyambura River Kyambura KCB Kazinga channel bank KCM Kazinga channel mid FLS Fish landing site

Correlation between waterborne parasites and physical parameters

Linear correlation analysis showed a strong inverse correlation between the presence of Acanthamoeba spp., Hartmannella spp., other FLA, Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. with DO (P < 0.05). The presence of these parasites showed a weak negative correlation with temperature. The presence of Cryptosporidium spp. showed a significant positive correlation (P < 0.05) with conductivity, pH and TDS. Similarly, the presence of Giardia spp. showed a strong positive correlation with TDS. Detailed analysis is presented in Table 3.
Table 3

Correlation between physical parameters and waterborne diseases (r values at 95 % CI)

In situ Parameter Acanthamoeba spp. Hartmannella spp. Naegleria spp.Other amoeba Cryptosporidium spp. Giardia spp.
DO(mg/L)-0.231** -0.129** 0.019-0.271** -319** -0.147**
Temp(°C)-0.051-0.1310.089- 0.066-0.084-0.072
Cond(μS/m)0.090.09-0.100* 0.154** 0.204** 0.105*
pH0.050.080.0750.0840.181** 0.094
TDS(g/L)0.098* 0.101-0.1090.148** 0.210** 0.142**

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01 (significant at these levels)

Correlation between physical parameters and waterborne diseases (r values at 95 % CI) * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01 (significant at these levels)

Molecular identification of the FLA isolates and phylogenetic analysis

Thirty-one representative samples scored positive with PCR, 10 with JDP-PCR and 20 with CRN5/1137-PCR. The FLA isolates that produced the strongest positive bands (Figs. 3 and 4) were further sequenced and investigated by phylogenetic analysis. Following sequence blasting and comparison with the GenBank results from NCBI (Fig. 5, Table 4 and Appendix: Table 6), the following species was identified: Acanthamoeba spp., Acanthamoeba polyphaga, Hartmannella vermiformis, Nuclearia pattersoni, Echinamoeba exundans, Bodomorpha minima and Cercomonas agilis. The Acanthamoeba sequences got belonged to the group of sequence types T1, T4, and T11. All the parasites identified in this study were matched with the reported diseases they cause in humans (Table 5).
Fig. 3

Agarose electrophoresis (2.5 %) showing amplification of JDP-PCR of Acanthamoeba. Lane M = DNA Ladder (100 bp), Lane A = Positive control, Lane N = Negative control, Lanes 1, 3, 5 & 6 = Acanthamoeba positive PCR product from obtained water samples

Fig. 4

Agarose electrophoresis (2.5 %), showing amplification of CRN5/1137- PCR. M = DNA Ladder (100 bp), P = Positive control, N = Negative control, 1-6 = PCR products from obtained water samples

Fig. 5

Phylogenetic tree showing the divergence of FLA. Comparison of GenBank sequences with their accession numbers (GenBank NCBI)

Table 4

Estimation of evolutionary divergence between sequences

Table 5

Parasites isolated and associated human diseases

NCBI Accession No.Genus and speciesAssociated Diseases
KU884884 Acanthamoeba spp. (T1)Encephalitis [11, 48]
KU894799 Acanthamoeba spp. (T4)Keratitis [4850]
KU894800 Acanthamoeba spp. (T4)Keratitis [4850]
KU894801 Acanthamoeba polyphaga.(T4)Keratitis [4850]
KU894802 Acanthamoeba spp. (T4)Keratitis [4850]
KU894803 Acanthamoeba spp. (T4)Keratitis [4850]
KU894804 Acanthamoeba spp. (T11)Keratitis [4850]
KU894805 Hartmanella vermiformis Keratitis [14, 41, 42]
KU894806 Echinamoeba exundans Keratitis [42, 44]
KU894807 Nuclearia pattersoni Unknown
KU894808 Echinamoeba exundans Unknown
KU894809 Bodomorpha minima Unknown
KU894810 Cercomonas agilis Unknown
KU894811 Echinamoeba exundans Unknown
KU894812 Echinamoeba exundans Unknown
KU894813 Echinamoeba exundans Unknown
KU894814 Hartmanella vermiformis Unknown
- Cryptosporidium spp.Cryptosporidiosis [18, 51]
- Giardia spp.Giardiasis [10, 18]
Agarose electrophoresis (2.5 %) showing amplification of JDP-PCR of Acanthamoeba. Lane M = DNA Ladder (100 bp), Lane A = Positive control, Lane N = Negative control, Lanes 1, 3, 5 & 6 = Acanthamoeba positive PCR product from obtained water samples Agarose electrophoresis (2.5 %), showing amplification of CRN5/1137- PCR. M = DNA Ladder (100 bp), P = Positive control, N = Negative control, 1-6 = PCR products from obtained water samples Phylogenetic tree showing the divergence of FLA. Comparison of GenBank sequences with their accession numbers (GenBank NCBI) Estimation of evolutionary divergence between sequences Parasites isolated and associated human diseases

Discussion

The availability of potable water in poor countries is a challenge as it causes serious health problems. Polluted water sources are the major causes for the prevalence of waterborne infections which sometimes results in severe morbidities and mortalities [3, 28]. Diseases such as cholera, campylobacteriosis, shigellosis, salmonellosis and a variety of fungal and parasitic infections are known to affect a number of rural communities in sub-Saharan Africa [29], but infections due to FLA, Cryptosporidium and Giardia due to contaminated water sources are less reported. Acanthamoebiasis (brain, eye and skin infection), Hartmannellosis (respiratory tract infections or generalised fatal meningoencephalitis) and Naegleriasis (brain-eating amoeba infection) are not mentioned as possible infectious diseases in Uganda, and yet they may be silently occurring among individuals causing severe pathogenic effects. Cryptosporidiosis and Giardiasis which are diseases of poverty have over-time been neglected. They are known to be prevalent among communities which lack access to clean potable water supply [7, 9, 30]. Most communities in QEPA, like any other protected wildlife areas in Africa, are surrounded by poor communities with an average income of less than US$1 per person per day [31]. This level of income limits the communities from accessing privately owned water resources that provide safe water in the area as the price for this essential services is costly. In the present study, all parasites except Hartmannella spp. and Naegleria spp. were more prevalent in the rainy season than the dry season, possibly due to contamination of the water sources with sewage or faeces through flooding. Previous studies have indicated that most waterborne parasites, especially FLA are more prevalent in cold rainy months of the year [32], whereas some like Hartmannella spp and Naegleria spp. are more common in warmer months [33]. Tap water had a higher prevalence of FLA than the natural water source. Considering specific natural water sites, prevalence and mean numbers of FLA were higher in KCB, FLS and R. Kyambura compared to KCM. These high numbers could be explained by high TDS due to organic matter from rotting leaves, animal and human faeces which are from the run-off from the land. Water from KCM appeared clear with less organic matter, the reason for few parasite presence. Tap water, on the other hand, had more FLA prevalence likely because all taps are supplied by the same natural water source with high TDS and organic matter, consequently, resulting in more biofilm formation along the piped water network. This is consistent with findings from other studies which explain that microorganisms settle on the inner surfaces of water pipes later becoming a source of secondary microbial contamination [34]. Acanthamoeba, Hartmannella, Naegleria and other FLA are known to thrive in areas containing high bacterial content which provide them with nutrition [11, 35]. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in these water sources were not significant but their mere presence is a health concern. The presence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia is due to human and animal faecal contamination of the water sources. Water sources for the communities in QEPA are all exposed to contamination from various points such as (1) hotels whose drainage enters directly into the water bodies, (2) fishing communities living nearby using shallow latrines from which excreta goes directly into the water bodies, (3) wild and domestic animal excreta also directly or indirectly ending up into water used by communities, and (4) Domestic refuse, rotten plants and soil entering into the water. The mean DO (mg/L) at all the water sources did not meet the minimal requirement of 4.90 mg/L set by Uganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS). Reduced DO is due to higher levels of TDS in the water. Decreased DO levels can be indicative of a large number bacteria and an excess amount of biological oxygen demand (BOD) due to untreated sewage, organic discharges and anoxic discharges, which deplete DO [36, 37]. Total Dissolved Solids are known to facilitates parasite proliferation [17, 38]. Linear correlation analysis showed that DO level had a negative correlation with the presence of Acanthamoeba spp., Hartmannella spp., other FLA, Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. Sometimes more parasites were found at slightly lower DO and less at higher DO. Previous studies have demonstrated that FLA, Cryptosporidium and Giardia can survive at low levels of DO [39]. In general, these parasites are reported to be more common in organic matter contaminated, bacteria-rich water irrespective of the physical parameters of the water [32]. However, often, they may be influenced by fluctuations in different physical parameters [40]. This study found pathogenic and non-pathogenic FLA in the water samples from the study sites. The potentially pathogenic FLA identified was Acanthamoeba spp. (T1, T4 and T11), A. polyphaga and H. vermiformis. A. polyphaga is one of the many Acanthamoeba spp. that cause GAE, AK, sinusitis and cutaneous infections especially in HIV/AIDS patients and other immunocompromised individuals [13, 41]. The inclusion of H. vermiformis on the list of human parasites was previously challenged by scientists citing lack of substantial evidence. However, recently H. vermiformis has consistently been mentioned as possible human parasites following its isolation in various mixed human AK infections [14, 41, 42] and as a result of their experimental effects in animal models [43]. A case of mixed keratitis infection reported due to H. vermiformis [14, 41] and another recent report regarding Vahlkampfia avara in Iran, in a mixed infection with Acanthamoeba spp. [44] should place more attention on other FLA not originally considered pathogenic. This means that it is possible for more FLA found in water, soil, dust, and other areas to become virulent anytime, given a conducive environment. C. parvum and G. lamblia are the most common waterborne pathogens associated with diarrhoea in developing countries [45] and yet there is little concern by authorities in mitigating their effects. The presence of FLA, Cryptosporidium and Giardia in all the water sources in QEPA possess a high risk to the communities. In QEPA, water used by households, park staff, and restaurants comes from River Kyambura, Kazinga channel, Lake George and Edward, where most wild animals inhabit or water themselves. All the human communities living at the periphery of QEPA have their homes located close to the water bodies from which they fetch water for domestic use. During the rainy season, wash off of human and animal faecal matter from land into the water bodies is severe, with an eventual concentration of a large portion of the organic matter at points where communities fetch water from. This, coupled with inadequate water treatment, poor hygiene practices (irregular washing of water vessels), drinking unboiled water and ignorance, predisposes community members to a variety of parasites. Most water parasites are highly abundant during the rainy seasons [46] with a resultant concentration of parasites to points where animals and humans have access to water, dictating a continuous pattern of infection. The QEPA communities whose population is increasing at an alarming rate continues to compete for the same resources with the wildlife. They use the same water for their livestock and families. Sharing of this resource by wildlife and domestic animals with no definitive disease control measures exposes them to a continued cycle of infection. The fact that certain potentially pathogenic waterborne parasites like FLA, Cryptosporidium and Giardia are not often mentioned as possible infectious agents easily transmitted from water and contaminated food poses a risk of silent infections and death [47]. High-level community awareness, policy formulations and regular surveillance is needed in order to mitigate the pathogenic effects of waterborne parasites. This can be possible through “One Health” initiatives involving multidisciplinary teams of animal health workers, medical workers, politicians, quality control officers, local key informants and opinion leaders sharing ideas on the best way forward in improving water safety.

Conclusion

The study shows that the protozoan parasites such as FLA, Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. found in the water resources in QEPA are a public health concern. This evidence shows the need for the relevant authorities in Uganda to initiate programmes for the control and prevention of diseases caused by these parasites. There must be a commitment from the government to supply clean potable water to the communities and this initiative must be of high priority. Community programmes must be initiated to educate the people on water safety measures, personal hygiene and water treatment processes. This study will, therefore, help in engaging the government in providing the necessary resources to improve community livelihoods of QEPA communities.

Abbreviations

+ve, Positive; °C, Celsius; AK, amoebic keratitis; CNS, Central Nervous System; FLA, free-living amoeba; FLS, fish landing site; g, Grams; g, gravitational force; GAE, granulomatous amoebic encephalitis; HIV/AIDS, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome; KCB, Kazinga channel bank; KCM, Kazinga channel mid; L, Liter; mg, Milligrams; ml, Milliliters; mM, millimolar; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; No., Number; PA, Protected Area; PAM, Primary amoebic meningoencephalitis; pg, picogram; pmol, picomoles; Prev, Prevalence; QEPA, Queen Elizabeth Protected Area; rpm, revolutions per minute; UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; V, Volts; μS, Microseconds.
Table 6

Given Accession Numbers from NCBI and Species from the Blast

Given NCBI Accession No.Sequence_codeSpecies from BlastAccession No.Query coverage (%)E-valueIdentity (%)
KU884884JDP_1Acanthamoeba sp.KM189419.189098
KU894799JDP_aAcanthamoeba sp.KF733221.199098
KU894800JDP_bAcanthamoeba sp.KF928953.199099
KU894801JDP_cAcanthamoeba polyphagaDQ013363.199097
KU894802JDP_gAcanthamoeba sp.KR259814.1910100
KU894803JDP_hAcanthamoeba sp.FJ422510.191097
KU894804JDPiAcanthamoeba sp.JX507295.193099
KU894805CRN5_cHartmanella vermiformisJQ271689.156.00084.00
Vermamoeba vermiformisKT185625.156.00084.00
KU894806CRN5_dEchinamoeba exundansAF293895.197.00093.00
Echinamoeba thermarumAJ489261.197.00085.00
Medicopsis romeroiKF015650.197.00078.00
Erysiphe moriAB033484.297.00078.00
Massaria platanoideaHQ599457.1100.003.00E-5877.00
Trematosphaeria biappendiculataGU205254.197.003.00E-5878.00
Lepidospaeria nicotiaeDQ384068.197.003.00E-5878.00
Verruculina enaliaAF053730.197.003.00E-5878.00
Ophioceras venezuelenseAF050476.197.003.00E-5878.00
Helicascus kanaloanusAF053729.197.003.00E-5878.00
KU894807CRN5_eNuclearia pattersoniAY364635.1996.00E-8877
Nuclearia simplexAF484687.1996.00E-8877
Paraphysoderma sedebokerenseKJ563218.1992.00E-7474
Archaeospora schenckiiFR773150.1992.00E-7474
Blastocladiales spEF565163.1992.00E-7474
Chlamydomonas debaryanaHQ662272.1993.00E-7374
Phlyctochytrium palustreJQ014022.1994.00E-7174
Spizellomyces spAB586079.1994.00E-7174
Funneliformis mosseaseFR750227.1995.00E-7074
Glomus spAJ301864.1996.00E-6974
KU894808CRN5_gEchinamoeba exundansAF293895.196075
Echinamoeba thermarumAJ489261.1968.00E-7068
Nuclearia spLN875111.1972.00E-5767
Entrophospora infrequensFR865452.1964.00E-5468
Spongilla lacustrisKC902349.1969.00E-5066
Tremella globisporaU00976.1923.00E-4967
Baikalospongia intermediaEF095188.1965.00E-4766
Glomus spAJ301864.1962.00E-4666
Solmundella bitentaculataEU247812.1969.00E-4466
KU894809CRN5_hBodomorpha minimaAF411276.1100099
CercomonadidaEU647174.199096
Heteromita spAY905499.197094
EimeriidaeEF024879.199094
Orciraptor agilisKF207875.199093
Cercozoa spEU709140.198093
KU894810CRN5_iCercomonas agilisAY748806.198096
Cercozoa spEU709140.196095
Orciraptor agilisKF207875.189091
EimeriidaeEF024879.189090
Viridiraptor invadensKF207870.189090
CercomonadidaEU647174.199087
Heteromita spAY905499.189089
Bodomorpha spHM536170.191088
ThaumatomonadidaEF024516.189088
Ebria tripartitaDQ303923.199086
Eocercomonas spHM536154.183091
ApiaceaeEF024041.182091
KU894811CRN5_kEchinamoeba exundansAF293895.198099
Echinamoeba thermarumAJ489261.1982.00E-8083
EimeriidaeEF024879.1982.00E-5979
NucleariidaeEF024271.1982.00E-5979
Rhizophydium spDQ536492.1982.00E-5978
Chlamydomonas spAY220092.1982.00E-5978
Leveillula tauricaAB033479.1989.00E-5978
KU894812CRN5_lEchinamoeba exundansAF293895.199099
Echinamoeba thermarumAJ489261.199082
Claroideoglomus lamellosumFR773152.178085
Glomus spAJ301864.178085
Entrophospora infrequensFR865452.178085
Cryptococcus spKM587000.182084
Filobasidium globisporumAB075546.182084
Filobasidium uniguttulatumAB032664.182084
KU894813CRN5_mEchinamoeba exundansAF293895.199086
Echinamoeba thermarumAJ489261.186077
Claroideoglomus lamellosumFR773152.186074
Glomus spAJ301864.186074
Entrophospora infrequensFR865452.186074
Cyanophora paradoxaFR865776.186073
Stylaster spEU645439.186073
Trechispora spAY803753.186073
KU894814CRN5_oHartmanella vermiformisAY502960.1100099
Vermamoeba vermiformisKC161965.1100098
  38 in total

1.  Scope of potential bacterial agents of diarrhoea and microbial assessment of quality of river water sources in rural Venda communities in South Africa.

Authors:  C L Obi; N Potgieter; P O Bessong; G Matsaung
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.915

2.  Global health and environmental pollution.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Richard Fuller
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 3.  Cutaneous acanthamoebiasis in AIDS.

Authors:  M S Torno; R Babapour; A Gurevitch; M D Witt
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  18S ribosomal DNA typing and tracking of Acanthamoeba species isolates from corneal scrape specimens, contact lenses, lens cases, and home water supplies of Acanthamoeba keratitis patients in Hong Kong.

Authors:  G C Booton; D J Kelly; Y-W Chu; D V Seal; E Houang; D S C Lam; T J Byers; P A Fuerst
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Suffering for water, suffering from water: access to drinking-water and associated health risks in Cameroon.

Authors:  H Blaise Nguendo Yongsi
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  The occurrence of Naegleria fowleri in recreational waters in Arizona.

Authors:  Laura Y Sifuentes; Brittany L Choate; Charles P Gerba; Kelly R Bright
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.269

7.  Molecular identification of t4 and t5 genotypes in isolates from acanthamoeba keratitis patients.

Authors:  D R Ledee; A Iovieno; D Miller; N Mandal; M Diaz; J Fell; M E Fini; E C Alfonso
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amoebae: Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, and Sappinia diploidea.

Authors:  Govinda S Visvesvara; Hercules Moura; Frederick L Schuster
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-11

9.  Occurrence of Thermotolerant Hartmannella vermiformis and Naegleria Spp. in Hot Springs of Ardebil Province, Northwest Iran.

Authors:  R Solgi; M Niyyati; A Haghighi; E Nazemalhosseini Mojarad
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.012

10.  Waterborne parasites: a current status from the Philippines.

Authors:  Subashini Onichandran; Thulasi Kumar; Cristina C Salibay; Julieta Z Dungca; Hazel Al Tabo; Norbel Tabo; Tian-Chye Tan; Yvonne Al Lim; Nongyao Sawangjaroen; Sucheep Phiriyasamith; Hemah Andiappan; Init Ithoi; Yee-Ling Lau; Veeranoot Nissapatorn
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.876

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The impact of water crises and climate changes on the transmission of protozoan parasites in Africa.

Authors:  Shahira A Ahmed; Milena Guerrero Flórez; Panagiotis Karanis
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Neuroimmunology of Common Parasitic Infections in Africa.

Authors:  Richard Idro; Rodney Ogwang; Antonio Barragan; Joseph Valentino Raimondo; Willias Masocha
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Isolation and morphological and molecular characterization of waterborne free-living amoebae: Evidence of potentially pathogenic Acanthamoeba and Vahlkampfiidae in Assiut, Upper Egypt.

Authors:  Martina M Nageeb; Hanan E M Eldeek; Rasha A H Attia; Atef A Sakla; Samia S Alkhalil; Haiam Mohamed Mahmoud Farrag
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Africa: current and future challenges.

Authors:  Sylvia Afriyie Squire; Una Ryan
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.876

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.