| Literature DB >> 20941893 |
Abstract
Although many African countries, along the equator, receive a great amount of rainfall and possess a dense hydrographic network, access to drinking-water remains a great challenge. In many households, water is used for various purposes, including domestic and crafts activities. According to the World Health Organization, an estimated four billion cases of diarrheoa occurs worldwide, of which 88% are ascribed to unsafe drinking-water. This study aimed at evaluating health risks in the usage of contaminated drinking-water and its relationship with the prevalence of diarrhoeal diseases in Yaound6, Cameroon. In this cross-sectional epidemiological design, 3,034 households with children aged less than five years were investigated. Households were selected from among 20 representative neighbourhoods out of 105 that made up the city. The study revealed a diarrheoa prevalence of 14.4% (437 diarrheoa cases out of 3,034 children tested). Among various risk factors examined, water-supply modes and quality of drinking-water were statistically associated with diarrheoa cases. Moreover, levels of diarrheoa attacks varied considerably from one neighbourhood to the other. The spatial analysis helped determine neighbourhoods of higher and lower prevalence of diarrheoa in the city.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20941893 PMCID: PMC2963764 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v28i5.6150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Fig. 1.Map showing location of Yaoundé in Cameroon
Fig. 2.The hydrographic (drainage) network
Fig. 3.Selected neighbourhoods
Fig. 4.Surveyed households with children aged less than 5 years
Fig. 5.Types of settlements in Yaoundé (for details, see Table 1)
Types of settlements in Yaoundé according to their spatial organization
| Type of settlement | Main characteristics | Neighbourhoods |
|---|---|---|
| Housing estates | Legal, recent, planned, less dense, highly provided with water and sanitation infrastructure and with adequate drainage and garbage disposal | Surveyed neighbourhoods: Cité Verte and Biyem Assi |
| Unsurveyed ones: Messa, Mballa IV, Mvog Ebanda, Mendong, and Olembé | ||
| Communal plots | Legal, dense, barely provided with water and sanitation infrastructure and with adequate drainage and garbage disposa | Surveyed neighbourhood: Elig Edzoa |
| Unsurveyed one: Mimboman | ||
| Wealthy residential neighbourhoods | Legal, planned, less dense, highly provided with water and sanitation infrastructure and with adequate drainage and garbage disposal | Surveyed neighbourhoods: Nkolndongo 2, Ekoudou Bastos, and Essos |
| Unsurveyed ones: Ntem Assi, Nkol Ebogo, Lac, Santa Barbara, and Koweit city | ||
| Central spontaneous neighbourhoods | Old, legal, dense, barely provided with water and sanitation infrastructure and with adequate drainage and garbage disposal | Surveyed neighbourhoods: Mvog Ada and Obili |
| Unsurveyed ones: Briqueterie, Mvog Mbi, Elig Belibi, and Olézoa | ||
| Subcentral spontaneous neighbourhoods | Old, illegal, highly dense, poorly provided with water and sanitation infrastructure and with adequate drainage and garbage disposal | Surveyed neighbourhoods: Mokolo and Elig Effa |
| Unsurveyed ones: NgoaEkellé, Oyom Abang, Efoulan, and Ekounou | ||
| Urban fringes areas | Illegal, recent, relatively dense, poorly provided with water and sanitation infrastructure and with adequate drainage and garbage disposal | Surveyed neighbourhoods: Emana and Nsam |
| Unsurveyed ones: Ekombitié, Nkolmesseng, and Odza | ||
| Semi-rural neighbourhoods | Illegal, recent, less dense, poorly provided with water and sanitation infrastructure and with adequate drainage and garbage disposal | Surveyed neighbourhood: Awaé Unsurveyed ones: Simbok, Biteng, and Febe |
Fig. 6.Spatial patterns of diarrhoeas with regard to consumption of groundwater (springs and wells)
Fig. 7.Spatial patterns of diarrhoeas with regard to consumption of groundwater (springs and wells)
Distribution of households in Yaoundé according to drinking-water sources and types of settlements
| Type of settlement | Private/individual taps | Semi-private water supply | Community taps | Wells | Springs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | |
| Housing estates | 254 | 8.5 | 68 | 2.3 | 21 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.03 | 5 | 0.2 |
| Communal plots | 76 | 2.5 | 123 | 4.1 | 84 | 2.8 | 1 | 0.03 | 17 | 0.6 |
| Wealthy residential neighbourhoods | 46 | 1.5 | 67 | 2.2 | 28 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.00 | 9 | 0.3 |
| Central spontaneous neighbourhoods | 47 | 1.6 | 226 | 7.6 | 190 | 6.3 | 0 | 0.00 | 12 | 0.4 |
| Subcentral spontaneous neighbourhoods | 128 | 4.3 | 431 | 14.5 | 517 | 17.4 | 2 | 0.06 | 71 | 2.4 |
| Urban fringes areas | 37 | 1.2 | 122 | 4.1 | 125 | 4.2 | 1 | 0.03 | 45 | 1.5 |
| Semi-rural neighbourhoods | 11 | 0.4 | 60 | 2.0 | 77 | 2.6 | 4 | 0.1 | 66 | 2.2 |
| Total | 599 | 20.15 | 1,097 | 36.9 | 1,042 | 35.0 | 9 | 0.3 | 225 | 7.6 |
Distribution of bacterial isolates according to source of drinking-water
| Bacteria | Sources of drinking-water | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Springs | Wells | Community standpipes | Households | |||||
| Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | |
| Enteric bacteria | ||||||||
| | 6 | 24.0 | 93 | 60.4 | – | – | 68 | 22.52 |
| | 7 | 28.0 | 29 | 18.8 | – | – | 28 | 9.3 |
| | 7 | 28.0 | 17 | 11.1 | – | – | 32 | 10.6 |
| | 1 | 4.0 | 1 | 0.6 | – | – | 1 | 0.7 |
| | 7 | 28.0 | 36 | 23.4 | 4 | 14.8 | 145 | 48.0 |
| | 24 | 96.0 | 137 | 88.9 | 2 | 7.4 | 239 | 79.1 |
| | – | – | – | – | 1 | 3.7 | – | – |
| | 2 | 8.0 | 4 | 2.6 | – | – | 8 | 2.6 |
| | 3 | 12.0 | 12 | 7.8 | – | – | 24 | 7.9 |
| | 5 | 20.0 | 37 | 24.0 | – | – | 73 | 24.1 |
| | 3 | 12.0 | 53 | 34.4 | – | – | 103 | 34.1 |
| | – | – | 4 | 2.6 | – | – | 8 | 2.6 |
| | 1 | 4.0 | 5 | 3.2 | – | – | 10 | 3.3 |
| | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 0.3 |
| | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 0.3 |
| Strict aerobic bacteria | ||||||||
| | 3 | 12.0 | 15 | 9.7 | – | – | 112 | 37.1 |
| | 12 | 48.0 | 57 | 37.0 | 2 | 7.4 | 147 | 48.7 |
| | 7 | 28.0 | 75 | 48.7 | 1 | 3.7 | 30 | 9.9 |
Prevalence of diarrhoeal diseases according to drinking-water source
| Water source | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| Wells | 120 | 27.46 |
| Springs | 178 | 40.73 |
| Households | 46 | 10.52 |
| Community standpipes | 93 | 21.29 |
Reading key example: Of the 437 diarrhoeal cases, 27.46% were recorded in households using water from wells;
p<0.005, χ2 test
Source-wise quality of total bacterial count of water samples
| Sample source | % of samples compared with the WHO guideline value | Total number of samples | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guideline value (<10 cfu/mL) | Excess to guideline value (>10 cfu/mL) | ||
| Households | 3.3 | 96.7 | 302 |
| Community standpipes | 55.5 | 44.5 | 27 |
| Wells | 0 | 100 | 154 |
| Springs | 0 | 100 | 25 |
Distribution of drinking-water sources in Yaoundé according to microbiological assessment
| Quality | Sources of drinking-water | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wells | Springs | Households (sored waters) | Community standpipes | ||||||||
| Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | ||
| Safe | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 10 | 3.3 | 15 | 55.6 | 25 | 4.9 | |
| Contaminated | 154 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 292 | 96.7 | 12 | 44.4 | 483 | 95.1 | |
| Total | 154 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 302 | 100 | 27 | 100 | 508 | 100 | |
Prevalence of diarrhoeal diseases according to type of settlements in Yaoundé
| Type of settlement | Households surveyed | Diarrhoea cases recorded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | % | Frequency | % | |
| Planned settlement | ||||
| Wealthy residential neighbourhoods | 158 | 5.2 | 12 | 7.6 |
| Housing estates | 352 | 11.6 | 31 | 8.8 |
| Communal plots | 304 | 10.2 | 41 | 13.5 |
| Spontaneous settlement | ||||
| Semi-rural neighbourhoods | 235 | 7.7 | 26 | 13.7 |
| Peri-urban fringes neighbourhoods | 342 | 11.3 | 57 | 16.3 |
| Subcentral spontaneous neighbourhoods | 1,164 | 38.3 | 176 | 18.4 |
| Central spontaneous neighbourhoods | 479 | 15.7 | 94 | 21.6 |
| Aggregate | 3,034 | 100 | 437 | 100 |
p<0.005