Michelle Livock1, Peter J Anderson2, Sharon Lewis3, Stephen Bowden1, Evelyne Muggli3, Jane Halliday3. 1. 1Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences,The University of Melbourne,12th Floor Redmond Barry Building, Parkville, VIC 3010,Australia. 2. 3Clinical Sciences,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute,Royal Children's Hospital,Parkville,Victoria,Australia. 3. 2Public Health Genetics,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute,Royal Children's Hospital,Parkville,Victoria,Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine overall micronutrient intake periconceptionally and throughout pregnancy in a population-based cohort of Australian women. DESIGN: In a prospective cohort study, micronutrient dosages were extracted from self-reported maternal supplement use, recorded pre-conception, and for each trimester of pregnancy. A food frequency scale (DQESv2) captured usual maternal diet for gestational weeks 14-26. The influence of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors associated with supplement use was examined using logistic regression, and changes in micronutrient intakes prior to and throughout pregnancy were assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA analyses. SETTING: Metropolitan hospital sites in Melbourne, Australia. SUBJECTS: Women with a viable singleton pregnancy were recruited at less than 19 weeks' gestation (n 2146). RESULTS: Compared with non-users, women using supplements during pregnancy were more likely to have planned their pregnancy, be >25 years old, primiparous, Caucasian, non-smokers, have a tertiary education and be consuming a folate-rich diet. Intakes of folate, Fe and Zn were significantly lower in the periconceptional period, compared with other periods (P<0·001). Intakes below Recommended Daily Intake levels were common both periconceptionally and throughout pregnancy, with 19-46 % of women not meeting the Recommended Daily Intake for folate, 68-82 % for Fe and 17-36 % for Zn. Conversely, 15-19 % of women consumed beyond the recommended Upper Limit for folate and 11-24 % for Fe. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the need for improved public health education on nutritional needs during pregnancy, especially among women with lower educational achievements and income.
OBJECTIVE: To examine overall micronutrient intake periconceptionally and throughout pregnancy in a population-based cohort of Australian women. DESIGN: In a prospective cohort study, micronutrient dosages were extracted from self-reported maternal supplement use, recorded pre-conception, and for each trimester of pregnancy. A food frequency scale (DQESv2) captured usual maternal diet for gestational weeks 14-26. The influence of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors associated with supplement use was examined using logistic regression, and changes in micronutrient intakes prior to and throughout pregnancy were assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA analyses. SETTING: Metropolitan hospital sites in Melbourne, Australia. SUBJECTS:Women with a viable singleton pregnancy were recruited at less than 19 weeks' gestation (n 2146). RESULTS: Compared with non-users, women using supplements during pregnancy were more likely to have planned their pregnancy, be >25 years old, primiparous, Caucasian, non-smokers, have a tertiary education and be consuming a folate-rich diet. Intakes of folate, Fe and Zn were significantly lower in the periconceptional period, compared with other periods (P<0·001). Intakes below Recommended Daily Intake levels were common both periconceptionally and throughout pregnancy, with 19-46 % of women not meeting the Recommended Daily Intake for folate, 68-82 % for Fe and 17-36 % for Zn. Conversely, 15-19 % of women consumed beyond the recommended Upper Limit for folate and 11-24 % for Fe. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the need for improved public health education on nutritional needs during pregnancy, especially among women with lower educational achievements and income.
Authors: Kristina Geyer; Julia Günther; Julia Hoffmann; Monika Spies; Roxana Raab; Ana Zhelyazkova; Inga Rose; Hans Hauner Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Moniek Looman; Claudia van den Berg; Anouk Geelen; Rahul A K Samlal; Rik Heijligenberg; Jacqueline M T Klein Gunnewiek; Michiel G J Balvers; Caroline L Leendertz-Eggen; Lia D E Wijnberger; Edith J M Feskens; Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 5.717