Literature DB >> 2748526

Efficiency of drug targeting: steady-state considerations using a three-compartment model.

A Boddy1, L Aarons, K Petrak.   

Abstract

Physiological models have often been used to investigate the processes involved in drug targeting. Such a model is used to investigate some aspects of drug targeting, including the pharmacodynamics of therapeutic and toxic effects. A simple pharmacodynamic model is incorporated in a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Conventional administration and drug targeting are compared at steady state for the same degree of therapeutic effect. The efficiency of drug targeting is quantified as the ratio (TA) of the rates of administration of free drug or of a drug-carrier complex required to achieve this effect. Also, the ratios of drug concentrations in the toxicity compartment (DTI) or of the consequent degree of toxic effects (TI) are used to compare conventional administration with drug targeting. The kinetic characteristics of the drug-carrier complex, rate of elimination, and rate of free drug release, influence TA but not DTI or TI. The importance of these characteristics depends on the cost and toxicity of the drug-carrier complex or of the carrier alone. The pharmacodynamics of the free drug in both the target and the toxicity compartments have an important influence on TI but not on TA or DTI. As the pharmacological selectivity of the drug increases, so does TI. However, a drug with good pharmacological selectivity may not be suitable for drug targeting. TI is also very dependent on the shape of the effect-concentration curves, particularly that for toxicity. While TA increases as the rate of elimination of free drug from either central or target compartments increases, TI may actually be reduced if release of free drug is not confined to the target compartment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2748526     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015971113161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  6 in total

1.  Engineering targeted in vivo drug delivery. I. The physiological and physicochemical principles governing opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  C A Hunt; R D Macgregor; R A Siegel
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Targeted drug delivery--some pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  G Levy
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  A critical evaluation of the principles governing the advantages of intra-arterial infusions.

Authors:  W W Eckman; C S Patlak; J D Fenstermacher
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1974-06

4.  Interspecies scaling of regional drug delivery.

Authors:  R L Dedrick
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 5.  Kinetics of pharmacologic response.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 12.310

6.  Influence of administration route on drug delivery to a target organ.

Authors:  S Oie; J D Huang
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.534

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  Comparison and critique of two models for regional drug delivery.

Authors:  R A Siegel; R D MacGregor; C A Hunt
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1991-06

2.  Application of a linear recirculation model to drug targeting.

Authors:  A V Boddy; L J Aarons
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1991-06

Review 3.  Perspectives in pharmacokinetics. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling as a tool for drug development.

Authors:  S B Charnick; R Kawai; J R Nedelman; M Lemaire; W Niederberger; H Sato
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1995-04

4.  Regional drug delivery I: permeability characteristics of the rat 6-day-old air pouch model of inflammation.

Authors:  S W Martin; A J Stevens; B S Brennan; M L Reis; L A Gifford; M Rowland; J B Houston
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Pharmacokinetic considerations of regional administration and drug targeting: influence of site of input in target tissue and flux of binding protein.

Authors:  M Rowland; A McLachlan
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1996-08

6.  In vitro and in vivo investigations of dihydropyridine-based chemical delivery systems for anticonvulsants.

Authors:  A V Boddy; K Zhang; F Lepage; F Tombret; J G Slatter; T A Baillie; R H Levy
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Heat-induced drug release rate and maximal targeting index of thermosensitive liposome in tumor-bearing mice.

Authors:  K Iga; Y Ogawa; H Toguchi
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 8.  Nanovehicular intracellular delivery systems.

Authors:  Ales Prokop; Jeffrey M Davidson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 9.  Efficient hepatic delivery of drugs: novel strategies and their significance.

Authors:  Nidhi Mishra; Narayan Prasad Yadav; Vineet Kumar Rai; Priyam Sinha; Kuldeep Singh Yadav; Sanyog Jain; Sumit Arora
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.