Literature DB >> 27484256

Anxiety associated with diagnostic uncertainty in early pregnancy.

A Richardson1,2,3, N Raine-Fenning1,2,3, S Deb2, B Campbell1, K Vedhara4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine anxiety levels of women presenting to an early pregnancy assessment unit (EPAU) with abdominal pain and/or vaginal bleeding and to assess how these levels change over time and according to ultrasonographic diagnosis.
METHODS: We undertook a prospective cohort study in an EPAU in a large UK teaching hospital. Women with abdominal pain and/or vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy (< 12 weeks' gestation) presenting for the first time were eligible for inclusion in the study. State anxiety levels were assessed using the standardized short form of Spielberger's state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) on three occasions (before, immediately after and 48-72 hours after an ultrasound scan). Scores were correlated with ultrasonographic diagnosis. The diagnosis was either certain or uncertain. Certain diagnoses were either positive, i.e. a viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), or negative, i.e. a non-viable IUP or ectopic pregnancy. Uncertain diagnoses included pregnancy of unknown location and pregnancy of uncertain viability. Statistical analysis involved mixed ANOVAs and the post-hoc Tukey-Kramer test.
RESULTS: A total of 160 women were included in the study. Anxiety levels decreased over time for women with a certain diagnosis (n = 128), even when negative (n = 64), and increased over time for women with an uncertain diagnosis (n = 32). Before the ultrasound examination, anxiety levels were high (STAI value, 21.96 ± 1.11) and there was no significant difference between the five groups. Immediately after the ultrasound examination, anxiety levels were lower in the viable IUP group (n = 64; 7.75 ± 1.13) than in any other group. The difference between the five groups was significant (P < 0.005). After 48-72 hours, women with a certain diagnosis had significantly lower anxiety levels than had those with an uncertain diagnosis (10.77 ± 4.30 vs 22.94 ± 1.65; P < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The experience of abdominal pain and/or vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy is highly anxiogenic. Following an ultrasound examination, the certainty of the diagnosis affects anxiety levels more than does the positive or negative connotations associated with the diagnosis per se. Healthcare providers should be aware of this when communicating uncertain diagnoses.
Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spielberger; anxiety; diagnostic uncertainty; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27484256     DOI: 10.1002/uog.17214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  9 in total

1.  Examining Uncertainty in Illness in Parents and Children With Chronic Kidney Disease and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Mediational Model of Internalizing Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Jennifer L Petrongolo; Nataliya Zelikovsky; Rachel M Keegan; Susan L Furth; Andrea Knight
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2020-03

Review 2.  Spontaneous Miscarriage Management Experience: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Angela L Ho; Algeny Hernandez; John M Robb; Stephanie Zeszutek; Sandy Luong; Emiru Okada; Karan Kumar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-19

3.  Indeterminate Prenatal Ultrasounds and Maternal Anxiety: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marielle S Gross; Hyeyoung Ju; Lauren M Osborne; Eric B Jelin; Priya Sekar; Angie C Jelin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-01-03

4.  Noninvasive prenatal screening for patients with high body mass index: Evaluating the impact of a customized whole genome sequencing workflow on sensitivity and residual risk.

Authors:  Dale Muzzey; James D Goldberg; Carrie Haverty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings.

Authors:  Carolyn A Miller; Andrea H Roe; Arden McAllister; Zachary F Meisel; Nathanael Koelper; Courtney A Schreiber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Gradient boosted trees with individual explanations: An alternative to logistic regression for viability prediction in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Thibaut Vaulet; Maya Al-Memar; Hanine Fourie; Shabnam Bobdiwala; Srdjan Saso; Maria Pipi; Catriona Stalder; Phillip Bennett; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne; Bart De Moor
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Patient attitudes and preferences for the management of pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Jessica K Wu; Emily N Sadecki; Moira A Kyweluk; Suneeta Senapati; Anne N Flynn; Elizabeth Steider; Tracey Thomas; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2022-07-09

8.  Effect of an Active vs Expectant Management Strategy on Successful Resolution of Pregnancy Among Patients With a Persisting Pregnancy of Unknown Location: The ACT or NOT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Karl R Hansen; Mary D Stephenson; Rebecca Usadi; Anne Z Steiner; Marcelle I Cedars; Emily S Jungheim; Kathleen M Hoeger; Stephen A Krawetz; Benjie Mills; Meredith Alston; Christos Coutifaris; Suneeta Senapati; Sarita Sonalkar; Michael P Diamond; Robert A Wild; Mitchell Rosen; Mary D Sammel; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Hao Huang; Heping Zhang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Clinical experience across the fetal-fraction spectrum of a non-invasive prenatal screening approach with low test-failure rate.

Authors:  S Hancock; R Ben-Shachar; C Adusei; C B Oyolu; E A Evans; H P Kang; C Haverty; D Muzzey
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.299

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.