Literature DB >> 27484242

Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning.

Rafael Dal-Ré1, Ana Marušić2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals and patients could be negatively influenced in their judgments by articles and meta-analyses presenting selective outcome reporting. Clinical trials should be transparent from inception to the publication of results. To this end, trial prospective registration is an ethical and scientific requirement that have shown to be effective in preventing selective reporting of outcomes. However, even journals with a clear pre-registration policy publish trial results that were retrospectively registered. SITUATION: Analyses of registration of randomized clinical trials recently published in top specialty journals and of meta-analyses with suspicion of including trials with outcome reporting bias have shown that retrospective registration is in the range from 56 to 76 %. This translates into publication of primary endpoints that differ from those included in the registry: some 30 % of trials showed discrepancies between the primary endpoint in the trial registry and the article. Furthermore, it has been shown that 8 % of all clinical trials published by 6 high-impact ICMJE-member journals was retrospectively registered after primary endpoint ascertainment could have had taken place, raising concerns that endpoints may not have been pre-specified, or were changed. With regards to meta-analyses, 34 % of Cochrane systematic reviews included one or more trials with a high suspicion of selective reporting bias for the primary outcome. PROPOSAL: Retrospective registration of trials may foster selective outcome reporting unless journal editors implement specific quality control processes aiming to prevent or minimize this type of bias. Prospective registration of trials-and protocol public disclosure if proven effective in future studies-prevents outcome reporting bias, a must to ensure clinicians and patients have access to reliable clinical trial results. Journal editors should enforce, rather than encourage, appropriate measures to ensure publication of trials free of outcome reporting bias.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Clinicaltrials.gov.; Outcome reporting bias; Registration; Reporting bias; Retrospective registration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27484242     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-016-2112-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  45 in total

1.  Social science. Promoting transparency in social science research.

Authors:  E Miguel; C Camerer; K Casey; J Cohen; K M Esterling; A Gerber; R Glennerster; D P Green; M Humphreys; G Imbens; D Laitin; T Madon; L Nelson; B A Nosek; M Petersen; R Sedlmayr; J P Simmons; U Simonsohn; M Van der Laan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.

Authors:  Shane Killeen; Panos Sourallous; Iain A Hunter; John E Hartley; Helen L O Grady
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Responsibility and accountability for well informed health-care decisions: a global challenge.

Authors:  Gro Jamtvedt; Marianne Klemp; Berit Mørland; Magne Nylenna
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Sharing and reporting the results of clinical trials.

Authors:  Kathy L Hudson; Francis S Collins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Compliance with trial registration in five core journals of clinical geriatrics: a survey of original publications on randomised controlled trials from 2008 to 2012.

Authors:  Eva Mann; Natalie Nguyen; Steffen Fleischer; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Reporting of results in ClinicalTrials.gov and high-impact journals.

Authors:  Jessica E Becker; Harlan M Krumholz; Gal Ben-Josef; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Biomarker studies: a call for a comprehensive biomarker study registry.

Authors:  Fabrice Andre; Lisa M McShane; Stefan Michiels; David F Ransohoff; Douglas G Altman; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Daniel F Hayes; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karmela Krleža-Jerić; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Howard Mann; Kay Dickersin; Jesse A Berlin; Caroline J Doré; Wendy R Parulekar; William S M Summerskill; Trish Groves; Kenneth F Schulz; Harold C Sox; Frank W Rockhold; Drummond Rennie; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting.

Authors:  Joerg J Meerpohl; Lisa K Schell; Dirk Bassler; Silvano Gallus; Jos Kleijnen; Michael Kulig; Carlo La Vecchia; Ana Marušić; Philippe Ravaud; Andreas Reis; Christine Schmucker; Daniel Strech; Gerard Urrútia; Elizabeth Wager; Gerd Antes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Authors:  Darren B Taichman; Joyce Backus; Christopher Baethge; Howard Bauchner; Peter W de Leeuw; Jeffrey M Drazen; John Fletcher; Frank A Frizelle; Trish Groves; Abraham Haileamlak; Astrid James; Christine Laine; Larry Peiperl; Anja Pinborg; Peush Sahni; Sinan Wu
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of reporting phase I trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.

Authors:  D Shepshelovich; H Goldvaser; L Wang; A R Abdul Razak; P L Bedard
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Legal regulations, ethical guidelines and recent policies to increase transparency of clinical trials.

Authors:  Jan Borysowski; Agata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska; Andrzej Górski
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Outcome reporting bias in nephrology randomized clinical trials: Examining outcomes represented by graphical illustrations.

Authors:  Frank Ward; Frances Shiely
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-05-25

4.  Nonregistration, discontinuation, and nonpublication of randomized trials: A repeated metaresearch analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Speich; Dmitry Gryaznov; Jason W Busse; Viktoria L Gloy; Szimonetta Lohner; Katharina Klatte; Ala Taji Heravi; Nilabh Ghosh; Hopin Lee; Anita Mansouri; Ioana R Marian; Ramon Saccilotto; Edris Nury; Benjamin Kasenda; Elena Ojeda-Ruiz; Stefan Schandelmaier; Yuki Tomonaga; Alain Amstutz; Christiane Pauli-Magnus; Karin Bischoff; Katharina Wollmann; Laura Rehner; Joerg J Meerpohl; Alain Nordmann; Jacqueline Wong; Ngai Chow; Patrick Jiho Hong; Kimberly Mc Cord-De Iaco; Sirintip Sricharoenchai; Arnav Agarwal; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Lars G Hemkens; Erik von Elm; Bethan Copsey; Alexandra N Griessbach; Christof Schönenberger; Dominik Mertz; Anette Blümle; Belinda von Niederhäusern; Sally Hopewell; Ayodele Odutayo; Matthias Briel
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 11.613

5.  Cochrane in CORR®: Oral Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs versus Other Oral Analgesic Agents for Acute Soft Tissue Injury.

Authors:  Kim Madden; Jason W Busse
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Prospective registration trends, reasons for retrospective registration and mechanisms to increase prospective registration compliance: descriptive analysis and survey.

Authors:  Kylie Elizabeth Hunter; Anna Lene Seidler; Lisa M Askie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Registration of published randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ludovic Trinquart; Adam G Dunn; Florence T Bourgeois
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Characteristics and publication fate of unregistered and retrospectively registered clinical trials submitted to The BMJ over 4 years.

Authors:  Elizabeth Loder; Stephen Loder; Sophie Cook
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Rationale and design of repeated cross-sectional studies to evaluate the reporting quality of trial protocols: the Adherence to SPIrit REcommendations (ASPIRE) study and associated projects.

Authors:  Dmitry Gryaznov; Ayodele Odutayo; Belinda von Niederhäusern; Benjamin Speich; Benjamin Kasenda; Elena Ojeda-Ruiz; Anette Blümle; Stefan Schandelmaier; Dominik Mertz; Yuki Tomonaga; Alain Amstutz; Christiane Pauli-Magnus; Viktoria Gloy; Karin Bischoff; Katharina Wollmann; Laura Rehner; Szimonetta Lohner; Joerg J Meerpohl; Alain Nordmann; Katharina Klatte; Nilabh Ghosh; Ala Taji Heravi; Jacqueline Wong; Ngai Chow; Patrick Jiho Hong; Kimberly Mc Cord; Sirintip Sricharoenchai; Jason W Busse; Arnav Agarwal; Ramon Saccilotto; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Giusi Moffa; Lars G Hemkens; Sally Hopewell; Erik von Elm; Matthias Briel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.