Literature DB >> 27483979

The streamlined Allostatic Load Index: a replication of study results.

Daniel Mauss1,2, Marc N Jarczok3, Joachim E Fischer1.   

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization stress in the workplace is becoming a major challenge of employers worldwide. While perceived stress levels can be assessed by questionnaires there is growing evidence that stress-related wear and tear of our body can be measured by the Allostatic Load Index (ALI). In a sample of 12,477 German industrial employees (19.6% female, 18-65 years) self-rated stress was explored by the effort-reward imbalance (ERI) questionnaire. A voluntary health check included biomarkers such as diastolic blood pressure, waist circumference, glycosylated hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein, and heart rate variability. Based on predefined subclinical cutoff values, a 5-variable ALI was calculated. Differences in ALI according to low (ERI ≤1.0) and high (ERI >1.0) stress levels were tested. The association of ERI and ALI was explored using logistic regression analysis controlling for multiple confounders. Employees perceiving high stress levels showed significant higher ALI scores (p < .001) compared to lower stressed employees. This association was stronger in men and independent of age. ALI was associated with work stress in adjusted models (OR 1.18 ± .08 [95% CI 1.03, 1.36]; p < .05). This study replicates former results in a large sample of industrial employees indicating that work stress is associated with a short form ALI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allostatic load; biomarker; chronic stress; effort-reward imbalance; heart rate variability; psychosocial load; work stress

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27483979     DOI: 10.1080/10253890.2016.1219718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stress        ISSN: 1025-3890            Impact factor:   3.493


  8 in total

1.  Allostatic load and heart rate variability as health risk indicators.

Authors:  Margaretha Viljoen; Nicolaas Claassen
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Predicting Chronic Stress among Healthy Females Using Daily-Life Physiological and Lifestyle Features from Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Noa Magal; Sharona L Rab; Pavel Goldstein; Lisa Simon; Talita Jiryis; Roee Admon
Journal:  Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks)       Date:  2022-07-25

Review 3.  Allostatic load in the context of disasters.

Authors:  Paul A Sandifer; Robert-Paul Juster; Teresa E Seeman; Maureen Y Lichtveld; Burton H Singer
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.693

4.  Interaction of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Allostatic Load among Adults in Various Occupations.

Authors:  Tahir Bashir; Emmanuel Obeng-Gyasi
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2022-04-29

5.  Allostatic Load in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Mini Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Asha Mathew; Ardith Z Doorenbos; Hongjin Li; Min Kyeong Jang; Chang Gi Park; Ulf G Bronas
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.318

Review 6.  Work Stress and Altered Biomarkers: A Synthesis of Findings Based on the Effort-Reward Imbalance Model.

Authors:  Johannes Siegrist; Jian Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Allostatic Load and Effort-Reward Imbalance: Associations over the Working-Career.

Authors:  José Ignacio Cuitún Coronado; Tarani Chandola; Andrew Steptoe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Physiological reactions to acute stressors and subjective stress during daily life: A systematic review on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies.

Authors:  Jeannette Weber; Peter Angerer; Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.