Literature DB >> 27483045

High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Scalp Arteries for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study.

Maxime Rhéaume1, Ryan Rebello2, Christian Pagnoux3, Simon Carette3, Marie Clements-Baker4, Violette Cohen-Hallaleh2, David Doucette-Preville2, B Stanley Jackson2, Samih Salama Sargious Salama2, George Ioannidis2, Nader A Khalidi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the concordance between high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the scalp arteries and temporal artery biopsy for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA).
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with suspected GCA. Participants underwent high-field 3T MRI of the scalp arteries followed by temporal artery biopsy. Arterial wall thickness and enhancement on multiplanar postcontrast T1-weighted spin-echo images were graded according to a published severity scale (range 0-3). MRI findings were compared with temporal artery biopsy results and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for GCA.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one patients were included in the study. Temporal artery biopsy findings were positive in 31 patients (18.1%), and MRI findings were abnormal in 60 patients (35.1%). ACR criteria were met in 137 patients (80.1%). With temporal artery biopsy as the reference test, MRI had a sensitivity of 93.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 78.6-99.2) and a specificity of 77.9% (95% CI 70.1-84.4). The corresponding negative predictive value of MRI was 98.2% (95% CI 93.6-99.8) and positive predictive value was 48.3% (95% CI 35.2-61.6).
CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected GCA, normal findings on scalp artery MRI are very strongly associated with negative temporal artery biopsy findings. This suggests that MRI could be used as the initial diagnostic procedure in GCA, with temporal artery biopsy being reserved for patients with abnormal MRI findings.
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27483045     DOI: 10.1002/art.39824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  12 in total

1.  Use of high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis.

Authors:  Diogo Goulart Corrêa; Diogo Galheigo de Oliveira E Silva; Luiz Celso Hygino da Cruz
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Simple dichotomous assessment of cranial artery inflammation by conventional 18F-FDG PET/CT shows high accuracy for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a case-control study.

Authors:  Berit Dalsgaard Nielsen; Ib Tønder Hansen; Stine Kramer; Ate Haraldsen; Karin Hjorthaug; Trond Velde Bogsrud; June Anita Ejlersen; Lars Bjørn Stolle; Kresten Krarup Keller; Philip Therkildsen; Ellen-Margrethe Hauge; Lars Christian Gormsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Increased diagnostic accuracy of giant cell arteritis using three-dimensional fat-saturated contrast-enhanced vessel-wall magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T.

Authors:  Guillaume Poillon; Adrien Collin; Ygal Benhamou; Gaëlle Clavel; Julien Savatovsky; Cécile Pinson; Kevin Zuber; Frédérique Charbonneau; Catherine Vignal; Hervé Picard; Tifenn Leturcq; Sébastien Miranda; Thomas Sené; Emmanuel Gerardin; Augustin Lecler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Neurologic manifestations of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Antoine Soulages; Igor Sibon; Jean-Michel Vallat; Emmanuel Ellie; Frédéric Bourdain; Fanny Duval; Louis Carla; Marie-Laure Martin-Négrier; Guilhem Solé; Charles Laurent; Agnès Monnier; Gwendal Le Masson; Stéphane Mathis
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  An update on the general management approach to common vasculitides.

Authors:  Mooikhin Hng; Sizheng S Zhao; Robert J Moots
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 6.  Facial nerve palsy in giant-cell arteritis: case-based review.

Authors:  Eveline Claeys; Olivier Gheysens; Wouter Meersseman; Eric Verbeken; Daniel Blockmans; Liesbet Henckaerts
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  The Role of Vascular Imaging to Advance Clinical Care and Research in Large-Vessel Vasculitis.

Authors:  Kaitlin A Quinn; Peter C Grayson
Journal:  Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol       Date:  2019-02-09

8.  Associations among temporal and large artery abnormalities on vascular ultrasound in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  M A DiIorio; P S Sobiesczcyk; C Xu; W Huang; J A Ford; S S Zhao; D H Solomon; W P Docken; S K Tedeschi
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.057

9.  Imaging in diagnosis, outcome prediction and monitoring of large vessel vasculitis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis informing the EULAR recommendations.

Authors:  Christina Duftner; Christian Dejaco; Alexandre Sepriano; Louise Falzon; Wolfgang Andreas Schmidt; Sofia Ramiro
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2018-02-02

10.  Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis by head-contrast three-dimensional computed tomography angiography: two case reports.

Authors:  Toshio Kawamoto; Michihiro Ogasawara; Souichiro Nakano; Yuko Matsuki Muramoto; Masakazu Matsushita; Kenjiro Yamanaka; Ken Yamaji; Naoto Tamura
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2019-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.