Literature DB >> 27480793

Which better predicts mortality among older men, a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis or vulnerability on the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)? A retrospective cohort study.

Lisa M Lowenstein1, Supriya G Mohile2, Heather Hopkins Gil3, Chintan Pandya4, Joshua Hemmerich5, Miriam Rodin6, William Dale5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Older men with a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis face competing mortality risks. Little is known about the prevalence of vulnerability and predictors of mortality in this population compared to men without a PCa diagnosis. We examined the predictive utility of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) for mortality in older men with a PCa diagnosis as compared to controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men aged ≥65years from an urban geriatrics clinic completed the VES-13 between 2003 and 2008. Each patient with a PCa diagnosis was matched by age to five controls, resulting in 59 patients with a PCa diagnosis and 318 controls. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association of a PCa diagnosis and vulnerability on the VES-13 with mortality. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The mean age for men with a PCa diagnosis and controls was 77.9years and 76.1years, respectively. Of those with a PCa diagnosis, 74.6% had no active disease or a rising PSA only. Regardless of PCa diagnosis, vulnerable individuals on the VES-13 were more likely to die during the study period (VES-13≥3: HR=4.46, p<0.01; VES13≥6: HR=3.77, p<0.01). Men with a PCa diagnosis were not more likely to die compared to age-matched controls (VES-13≥3: HR=1.14, p=0.59; VES13≥6: HR=1.06, p=0.83). Vulnerability for men with a PCa diagnosis was more predictive of mortality. Therefore, the assessment of vulnerability is important for establishing goals of care.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mortality; Prostate cancer; Vulnerability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27480793      PMCID: PMC5159296          DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol        ISSN: 1879-4068            Impact factor:   3.599


  34 in total

1.  Geriatric Assessment-Guided Care Processes for Older Adults: A Delphi Consensus of Geriatric Oncology Experts.

Authors:  Supriya Gupta Mohile; Carla Velarde; Arti Hurria; Allison Magnuson; Lisa Lowenstein; Chintan Pandya; Anita O'Donovan; Rita Gorawara-Bhat; William Dale
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  What threshold for adjuvant therapy in older breast cancer patients?

Authors:  M Extermann; L Balducci; G H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Geriatric assessment-identified deficits in older cancer patients with normal performance status.

Authors:  Trevor A Jolly; Allison M Deal; Kirsten A Nyrop; Grant R Williams; Mackenzi Pergolotti; William A Wood; Shani M Alston; Brittaney-Belle E Gordon; Samara A Dixon; Susan G Moore; W Chris Taylor; Michael Messino; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-03-12

4.  Interplay of race, socioeconomic status, and treatment on survival of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kendra Schwartz; Isaac J Powell; Willie Underwood; Julie George; Cecilia Yee; Mousumi Banerjee
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Epidemiology of prostate cancer.

Authors:  E David Crawford
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Higher vulnerable elders survey scores predict death and functional decline in vulnerable older people.

Authors:  Lillian C Min; Marc N Elliott; Neil S Wenger; Debra Saliba
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  PPT and VES-13 in elderly patients with cancer: evaluation in multidimensional geriatric assessment and prediction of survival.

Authors:  Julia Augschoell; Georg Kemmler; Marije E Hamaker; Reinhard Stauder
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  The vulnerable elders-13 survey predicts 5-year functional decline and mortality outcomes in older ambulatory care patients.

Authors:  Lillian Min; William Yoon; Jeff Mariano; Neil S Wenger; Marc N Elliott; Caren Kamberg; Debra Saliba
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry.

Authors:  Jay F Piccirillo; Ryan M Tierney; Irene Costas; Lori Grove; Edward L Spitznagel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Screening for vulnerability in older cancer patients: the ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Pierre Soubeyran; Carine Bellera; Jean Goyard; Damien Heitz; Hervé Curé; Hubert Rousselot; Gilles Albrand; Véronique Servent; Olivier Saint Jean; Isabelle van Praagh; Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz; Stéphane Périn; Jean-Luc Verhaeghe; Catherine Terret; Christophe Desauw; Véronique Girre; Cécile Mertens; Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier; Muriel Rainfray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  External validation of the Vulnerable Elder's Survey for predicting mortality and emergency admission in older community-dwelling people: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emma Wallace; Ronald McDowell; Kathleen Bennett; Tom Fahey; Susan M Smith
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  Reliability and validity test of VES-13 and analysis of influencing factors for the vulnerable condition of patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jia Feng; Qian Sun; Jing Li; Ting-Ting Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.