Literature DB >> 27479308

Recommendations From the International Colorectal Cancer Screening Network on the Evaluation of the Cost of Screening Programs.

Sujha Subramanian1, Florence K L Tangka, Sonja Hoover, Marion Nadel, Robert Smith, Wendy Atkin, Julietta Patnick.   

Abstract

Worldwide, colorectal cancer is the fourth leading cause of death from cancer and the incidence is projected to increase. Many countries are exploring the introduction of organized screening programs, but there is limited information on the resources required and guidance for cost-effective implementation. To facilitate the generating of the economics evidence base for program implementation, we collected and analyzed detailed program cost data from 5 European members of the International Colorectal Cancer Screening Network. The cost per person screened estimates, often used to compare across programs as an overall measure, varied significantly across the programs. In addition, there were substantial differences in the programmatic and clinical cost incurred, even when the same type of screening test was used. Based on these findings, several recommendations are provided to enhance the underlying methodology and validity of the comparative economic assessments. The recommendations include the need for detailed activity-based cost information, the use of a comprehensive set of effectiveness measures to adequately capture differences between programs, and the incorporation of data from multiple programs in cost-effectiveness models to increase generalizability. Economic evaluation of real-world colorectal cancer-screening programs is essential to derive valuable insights to improve program operations and ensure optimal use of available resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27479308      PMCID: PMC6003240          DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  16 in total

1.  Clinical and programmatic costs of implementing colorectal cancer screening: evaluation of five programs.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Florence K L Tangka; Sonja Hoover; Amy Degroff; Janet Royalty; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2010-10-30

Review 2.  Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Marion Nadel; Robert A Smith; Wendy Atkin; Subash B Duggirala; Robert Fletcher; Seth N Glick; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; John B Pope; Michael B Potter; David Ransohoff; Douglas Rex; Robert Schoen; Paul Schroy; Sidney Winawer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  A structured instrument for estimating the economic cost of drug abuse treatment. The Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program (DATCAP).

Authors:  M T French; L J Dunlap; G A Zarkin; K A McGeary; A T McLellan
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Durado Brooks; Mary Doroshenk; Stacey Fedewa; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley; Richard Wender
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Toward standardizing and reporting colorectal cancer screening indicators on an international level: The International Colorectal Cancer Screening Network.

Authors:  Victoria S Benson; Wendy S Atkin; Jane Green; Marion R Nadel; Julietta Patnick; Robert A Smith; Patricia Villain
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Estimating the direct costs of bowel cancer services provided by the National Health Service in England.

Authors:  Matthew W Bending; Paul Trueman; Karin V Lowson; Hazel Pilgrim; Paul Tappenden; Jim Chilcott; Janine Tappenden
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Costs of planning and implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Florence K L Tangka; Sonja Hoover; Maggie C Beebe; Amy DeGroff; Janet Royalty; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Melissa M Center; Ahmedin Jemal; Robert A Smith; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Cost-effectiveness of an opportunistic screening programme and brief intervention for excessive alcohol use in primary care.

Authors:  Luqman Tariq; Matthijs van den Berg; Rudolf T Hoogenveen; Pieter H M van Baal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cost of starting colorectal cancer screening programs: results from five federally funded demonstration programs.

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Bela Bapat; Laura C Seeff; Amy DeGroff; James Gardner; A Blythe Ryerson; Marion Nadel; Janet Royalty
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.