Literature DB >> 20942988

Estimating the direct costs of bowel cancer services provided by the National Health Service in England.

Matthew W Bending1, Paul Trueman, Karin V Lowson, Hazel Pilgrim, Paul Tappenden, Jim Chilcott, Janine Tappenden.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bowel cancer is the second most common cancer in England and Wales, accounting for approximately 13,000 deaths per year. Economic evaluations and national guidance have been produced for individual treatments for bowel cancer. However, it has been suggested that Primary Care Trusts develop program budgeting or equivalent methodology demonstrating a whole system approach to investment and disinvestment. The objective of this study was to provide a baseline framework for considering a whole system approach to estimate the direct costs of bowel cancer services provided by the National Health Service (NHS) in England.
METHODS: A treatment pathway, developed in 2005, was used to construct a service pathway model to estimate the direct cost of bowel cancer services in England.
RESULTS: The service pathway model estimated the direct cost of bowel cancer services to the NHS to be in excess of £1 billion in 2005. Thirty-five percent of the cost is attributable to the screening and testing of patients with suspected bowel cancer, subsequently diagnosed as cancer-free.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is believed to be the most comprehensive attempt to identify the direct cost of managing bowel cancer services in England. The approach adopted could be useful to assist local decision makers in identifying those aspects of the pathway that are most uncertain in terms of their cost-effectiveness and as a basis to explore the implications of re-allocated resources. Research recommendations include the need for detailed costs on surgical procedures, high-risk patients and the utilization of the methods used in this study across other cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20942988     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462310001078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  7 in total

1.  Recommendations From the International Colorectal Cancer Screening Network on the Evaluation of the Cost of Screening Programs.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Florence K L Tangka; Sonja Hoover; Marion Nadel; Robert Smith; Wendy Atkin; Julietta Patnick
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

2.  Inter-relationships between the economic and emotional consequences of colorectal cancer for patients and their families: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alan Ó Céilleachair; Liza Costello; Claire Finn; Aileen Timmons; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Kanika Kapur; Anthony Staines; Linda Sharp
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Social and geographical factors affecting access to treatment of colorectal cancer: a cancer registry study.

Authors:  S Michael Crawford; Violet Sauerzapf; Robin Haynes; David Forman; Andrew P Jones
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The cost of systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma in Slovenia: discrepancy analysis between cost and reimbursement.

Authors:  Tanja Mesti; Biljana Mileva Boshkoska; Mitja Kos; Metka Tekavčič; Janja Ocvirk
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  What is the impact of rerouting a cancer diagnosis from emergency presentation to GP referral on resource use and survival? Evidence from a population-based study.

Authors:  Mauro Laudicella; Brendan Walsh; Elaine Burns; Paolo Li Donni; Peter C Smith
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Whole-colon investigation vs. flexible sigmoidoscopy for suspected colorectal cancer based on presenting symptoms and signs: a multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Kate Wooldrage; Emma C Robbins; Kevin Pack; Jeremy P Brown; William Hamilton; Michael R Thompson; Karen G Flashman; Steve Halligan; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Margaret Vance; Brian P Saunders; Wendy Atkin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Patient and work flow and costs associated with staff time and facility usage at a comprehensive cancer centre in Quebec, Canada--a time and motion study.

Authors:  Gayle A Shinder; Pierre Emmanuel Paradis; Marianne Posman; Natalia Mishagina; Marie-Pascale Guay; Dina Linardos; Gerald Batist
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.