| Literature DB >> 27479297 |
Yi-Cheng Wu1, Quan Qian1, Ricardo J Soares Magalhaes2,3, Zhi-Hai Han4, Wen-Biao Hu5, Ubydul Haque6,7, Thomas A Weppelmann6,8, Yong Wang1, Yun-Xi Liu9, Xin-Lou Li10, Hai-Long Sun1, Yan-Song Sun11, Archie C A Clements12, Shen-Long Li1, Wen-Yi Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scrub typhus is endemic in the Asia-Pacific region including China, and the number of reported cases has increased dramatically in the past decade. However, the spatial-temporal dynamics and the potential risk factors in transmission of scrub typhus in mainland China have yet to be characterized.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27479297 PMCID: PMC4968795 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Temporal distribution of scrub typhus cases from 2006 to 2014 in mainland China.
The temporal distributions of reported scrub typhus cases in mainland China are presented as the monthly number of cases (blue line) and cumulative cases (gray spikes) in panel A and the total number of cases reported per year (blue dots) fit with an exponential growth function (black line) in panel B.
Fig 2Seasonal patterns in reported scrub typhus cases from 2006 to 2014 in mainland China.
The seasonal patterns of reported scrub typhus cases in mainland China are presented as the average number of cases reported by month (blue dots) and the incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals for the IRR (dashed and dotted lines) derived from a categorical Poisson regression models for the number of reported cases per month, with all months compared to the number of cases reported in January of each year in panel A. The seasonal patterns as determined by monthly autocorrelation between the number of reported cases for each month is presented using time lags between 0 and 60 months in panel B.
Yearly spatiotemporal autocorrelation analysis on scrub typhus incidence in mainland China, 2006–2014.
| Year | Moran's | Z-Score | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 0.02 | 9.59 | <0.05 |
| 2007 | 0.03 | 18.11 | <0.05 |
| 2008 | 0.05 | 27.33 | <0.05 |
| 2009 | 0.05 | 25.19 | <0.05 |
| 2010 | 0.05 | 27.02 | <0.05 |
| 2011 | 0.06 | 30.44 | <0.05 |
| 2012 | 0.06 | 36.24 | <0.05 |
| 2013 | 0.07 | 38.05 | <0.05 |
| 2014 | 0.08 | 42.43 | <0.05 |
Fig 3Yearly Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) cluster maps for scrub typhus incidence in mainland China, 2006–2014.
LISA spatial cluster map shows the center of the cluster in color. H-H indicates a statistically significant cluster of high scrub typhus incidence values; H-L represents high scrub typhus incidence values surrounded with low incidence values; L-H represents low scrub typhus incidence values surrounded with high incidence values.
Descriptive statistics of scrub typhus spatial clusters detected by Local Indicators of Spatial Association analysis in mainland China, 2006–2014.
| Incidence* (1/100000) | % Cases | %Counties | % Population | % Area | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | |||||
| HH | 3.23 | 48.96 | 1.51 | 1.44 | 0.80 |
| HL | 10.43 | 9.62 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| LH | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 2007 | |||||
| HH | 2.31 | 61.08 | 2.91 | 2.68 | 1.87 |
| HL | 3.17 | 5.01 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.09 |
| LH | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
| 2008 | |||||
| HH | 3.36 | 63.64 | 3.83 | 3.75 | 2.75 |
| HL | 6.58 | 0.96 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| LH | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| 2009 | |||||
| HH | 5.72 | 65.82 | 3.25 | 2.82 | 2.45 |
| HL | 3.94 | 5.82 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 0.07 |
| LH | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.18 |
| 2010 | |||||
| HH | 6.69 | 59.78 | 3.25 | 2.77 | 2.53 |
| HL | 7.95 | 7.45 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.07 |
| LH | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.37 |
| 2011 | |||||
| HH | 6.86 | 64.80 | 4.31 | 4.30 | 3.02 |
| HL | 7.27 | 1.35 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| LH | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.20 | 0.40 |
| 2012 | |||||
| HH | 8.11 | 64.67 | 5.13 | 5.37 | 3.68 |
| HL | 11.98 | 7.22 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.09 |
| LH | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 2013 | |||||
| HH | 9.95 | 67.57 | 5.99 | 5.73 | 3.99 |
| HL | 11.46 | 6.95 | 0.31 | 0.51 | 0.13 |
| LH | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| 2014 | |||||
| HH | 12.51 | 61.18 | 6.19 | 5.95 | 4.67 |
| HL | 20.40 | 7.59 | 0.24 | 0.45 | 0.09 |
| LH | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.62 | 0.38 | 0.61 |
Incidence*: annual average incidence, calculated using yearly counts of scrub typhus cases as a numerator and population size in the middle of each year as a denominator; HH: High-High, a statistically significant cluster of high scrub typhus incidence values; HL: High-Low, high scrub typhus incidence values surrounded with low scrub typhus incidence values; LH: Low-High, low scrub typhus incidence values surrounded with high scrub typhus incidence values.
Fig 4Yearly spatiotemporal clusters overlay with annual incidence of scrub typhus in mainland China, 2006–2014.
Yearly spatiotemporal clusters were detected using a circular scan window with the maximum spatial size of 5% of the population at risk and a maximum temporal size of 10% of the study period.
Fig 5Spatiotemporal clusters overlay with annual average incidence of scrub typhus across the period of 2006–2014 in mainland China.
Spatiotemporal clusters of scrub typhus detected using Kulldorff’s space-time scan statistic in mainland China*, 2006–2014.
| Clusters | Longitude | Latitude | Radius(Km) | Time Frame | No. Counties | No. Obs | No. Exp | LLR | RR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 97.81 | 24.04 | 491.64 | 2014/7-2014/10 | 115 | 3313 | 54.31 | 10460.19 | 64.88 |
| 2 | 111.39 | 23.58 | 191.43 | 2014/5-2014/11 | 101 | 3562 | 176.06 | 7433.65 | 21.58 |
| 3 | 116.15 | 33.16 | 76.71 | 2014/10-2014/11 | 17 | 1219 | 12.10 | 4429.29 | 103.02 |
| 4 | 120.02 | 34.09 | 213.36 | 2014/10-2014/11 | 85 | 1593 | 45.33 | 4144.77 | 36.17 |
| 5 | 116.13 | 25.13 | 228.98 | 2014/5-2014/11 | 132 | 1821 | 178.48 | 2612.10 | 10.52 |
| 6 | 118.08 | 37.76 | 200.83 | 2014/10 | 116 | 406 | 25.63 | 742.51 | 15.95 |
| 7 | 117.14 | 40.21 | 0.00 | 2014/10 | 1 | 130 | 0.16 | 739.12 | 800.71 |
| 8 | 108.58 | 34.01 | 27.82 | 2012/10-2012/11 | 2 | 70 | 1.16 | 218.16 | 60.38 |
| 9 | 118.81 | 29.01 | 207.78 | 2014/6-2014/10 | 117 | 320 | 109.45 | 133.17 | 2.94 |
| 10 | 112.63 | 26.76 | 40.31 | 2009/7 | 6 | 37 | 1.19 | 91.39 | 31.13 |
| 11 | 124.05 | 40.58 | 40.68 | 2006/10-2006/11 | 2 | 18 | 0.59 | 44.16 | 30.59 |
| 12 | 113.71 | 28.23 | 0.00 | 2007/9-2007/10 | 1 | 17 | 1.01 | 32.00 | 16.83 |
*Significant clusters with P<0.01;
※1: Primary cluster;
#2–12: Secondary clusters;
▲: Only 1 county was include in the cluster;
No. Counties: number of counties within clusters; No. Obs: number of observed cases; No. Exp: number of expected cases; LLR: log likelihood ratio; RR: relative risk of the cluster compared with the rest of the country.
Scrub typhus incidence rate, proportion of population and cases in spatiotemporal clusters detected using Kulldorff’s space-time scan statistic in mainland China, 2006–2014.
| Clusters | Time Frame | Incidence* (1/100,000) | % Population | % Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014/7-2014/10 | 9.56 | 2.63 | 29.28 |
| 2 | 2014/5-2014/11 | 5.61 | 4.81 | 23.29 |
| 3 | 2014/10-2014/11 | 6.92 | 1.34 | 19.88 |
| 4 | 2014/10-2014/11 | 2.51 | 4.81 | 25.98 |
| 5 | 2014/5-2014/11 | 2.81 | 4.91 | 11.91 |
| 6 | 2014/10 | 0.63 | 4.88 | 9.18 |
| 7 | 2014/10 | 24.47 | 0.04 | 2.94 |
| 8 | 2012/10-2012/11 | 4.62 | 0.11 | 2.07 |
| 9 | 2014/6-2014/10 | 0.57 | 4.29 | 2.49 |
| 10 | 2009/7 | 1.21 | 0.23 | 5.86 |
| 11 | 2006/10-2006/11 | 2.34 | 0.06 | 3.67 |
| 12 | 2007/9-2007/10 | 1.28 | 0.10 | 3.21 |
※1: Primary cluster;
#2–12: Secondary clusters;
Incidence*: Scrub typhus incidence during the clustering time.
The association between Scrub typhus and potential factors by panel Poisson regression analysis.
| Variables(Unit) | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude IRR (95%CI) | Adjusted IRR (95%CI) | |||
| Percentage of cropland (10%) | 0.61(0.60,0.62) | < 0.000 | 0.65(0.55,0.76) | < 0.000 |
| Percentage of forest (10%) | 1.17(1.15,1.20) | < 0.000 | 0.62(0.53,0.73) | < 0.000 |
| Percentage of grassland (10%) | 0.23(0.19,0.28) | < 0.000 | 0.48(0.36,0.63) | < 0.000 |
| Percentage of shrub (10%) | 7.52(7.18,7.87) | < 0.000 | 1.29(1.09,1.53) | < 0.005 |
| Percentage of built-up land (10%) | 0.64(0.61,0.67) | < 0.000 | 0.46(0.39,0.52) | < 0.000 |
| Percentage of water body (10%) | 0.25(0.23,0.27) | < 0.000 | 0.33(0.28,0.40) | < 0.000 |
| Temperature (1 degree Celsius) | 1.06(1.05,1.07) | < 0.000 | 1.35(1.33,1.37) | < 0.000 |
| Relative humidity (1%) | 0.90(0.90,0.91) | < 0.000 | 0.89(0.89,0.90) | < 0.000 |
| Precipitation (100mm) | 1.01(1.00,1.01) | < 0.000 | 1.01(1.00,1.02) | < 0.000 |
| Autoregressive term (10km) | 0.90(0.89,0.91) | < 0.000 | 0.88(0.87,0.89) | < 0.000 |