| Literature DB >> 24620733 |
Tiegang Li, Zhicong Yang, Zhiqiang Dong, Ming Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scrub typhus is becoming the most common vector born disease in Guangzhou, southern China. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of weather patterns on the incidence of Scrub typhus in the subtropical city of Guangzhou for the period 2006-2012, and assist public health prevention and control measures.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24620733 PMCID: PMC3995673 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Scrub typhus confirmed cases in Guangzhou, southern China, 2006-2012.
Figure 2Monthly disturbance of a) average temperature; b) average atmospheric pressure; c) average relative humidity; d) average wind velocity; e)aggregate rainfall; f) aggregate sunshine in Guangzhou, southern China, 2006-2012.
Summary statistics for monthly scrub typhus confirmed cases and weather conditions in Guangzhou, southern China, 2006-2012
| Average temperature (°C) | 22.49 | 5.72 | 9.52 | 17.89 | 23.19 | 27.90 | 30.77 |
| Average atmospheric pressure (hPa) | 1007.29 | 6.18 | 994.28 | 1002.40 | 1007.83 | 1012.12 | 1018.90 |
| Average relative humidity (%) | 73.20 | 7.66 | 55.10 | 68.21 | 74.53 | 78.72 | 87.33 |
| Average wind velocity (m/s) | 1.76 | 0.60 | 1.12 | 1.37 | 1.51 | 2.03 | 3.96 |
| Aggregate rainfall (mm) | 156.10 | 156.64 | 0.10 | 43.77 | 101.60 | 222.62 | 834.72 |
| Aggregate sunshine (h) | 130.15 | 55.21 | 24.40 | 82.85 | 132.85 | 179.05 | 245.00 |
| Scrub typhus confirmed cases | 47.60 | 51.83 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 35.00 | 67.50 | 260.00 |
Note. all the data were presented as monthly average or aggregate values.
S.D. = Standard deviation.
Pearson’s correlation coefficient (‘r’) matrix of meteorological variables in Guangzhou, southern China, 2006-2012
| Atmospheric pressure | 1 | | | | | |
| Relative humidity | −0.59 (p = 0.00) | 1.00 | | | | |
| Average temp. | −0.86 (p = 0.00) | 0.32 (p = 0.00) | 1.00 | | | |
| Rainfall | −0.58 (p = 0.00) | 0.52 (p = 0.00) | 0.53 (p = 0.00) | 1.00 | | |
| Sunshine | -.028 (p = 0.01) | −0.43 (p = 0.00) | 0.40 (p = 0.00) | −0.16 (p = 0.15) | 1.00 | |
| Wind velocity | −0.10 (p = 0.36) | 0.20 (p = 0.06) | −0.28 (p = 0.01) | −0.12 (p = 0.29) | 0.00 (p = 0.99) | 1.00 |
Negative binomial regression model of meteorological factors associated with risk of scrub typhus incidence in Guangzhou, southern China, 2006–2012*
| | | | | | | |
| Intercept | −530.11 | 28.42 | 0.00 | – | – | – |
| Aggregate sunshine | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.25 |
| Aggregate rainfall | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
| Average wind velocity | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 9.15 | −0.92 | 20.25 |
| Average relative humidity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.33 | −0.45 | −1.33 | 0.45 |
| Average temperature | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 15.61 | 14.00 | 17.24 |
| Year | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 30.20 | 26.62 | 33.88 |
| | | | | | | |
| Intercept | −307.62 | 26.69 | 0.00 | – | – | – |
| Aggregate sunshine | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.50 |
| Aggregate rainfall | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.11 |
| Average wind velocity | −0.19 | 0.05 | 0.06 | −17.20 | −24.16 | 122.77 |
| Average relative humidity | −0.01 | 0.03 | 0.17 | −1.32 | −2.33 | 102.00 |
| Average atmospheric pressure | −0.10 | 0.01 | 0.00 | −9.36 | −10.38 | −8.34 |
| Year | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 22.70 | 19.47 | 26.02 |
| | | | | | | |
| Intercept | −540.03 | 18.48 | 0.00 | – | – | – |
| Aggregate sunshine | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.26 |
| Aggregate rainfall | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| Average temperature | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 14.98 | 13.65 | 16.33 |
| Year | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 30.84 | 28.50 | 33.22 |
| | | | | | | |
| Intercept | −184.32 | 20.37 | 0.00 | – | – | – |
| Aggregate sunshine | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.62 |
| Aggregate rainfall | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
| Average atmospheric pressure | −0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −8.03 | −8.75 | −7.31 |
| Year | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 14.46 | 12.42 | 16.54 |
*Negative binomial regression model for monthly scrub typhus incidence without atmospheric pressure (A) and without average temperature (B). Final models without atmospheric pressure (C) and without average temperature (D).
CI = Confidence interval, S.E. = Standard error.