Literature DB >> 27477129

Genetic correlations and sex-specific adaptation in changing environments.

Tim Connallon1, Matthew D Hall2.   

Abstract

Females and males have conflicting evolutionary interests. Selection favors the evolution of different phenotypes within each sex, yet divergence between the sexes is constrained by the shared genetic basis of female and male traits. Current theory predicts that such "sexual antagonism" should be common: manifesting rapidly during the process of adaptation, and slow in its resolution. However, these predictions apply in temporally stable environments. Environmental change has been shown empirically to realign the direction of selection acting on shared traits and thereby alleviate signals of sexually antagonistic selection. Yet there remains no theory for how common sexual antagonism should be in changing environments. Here, we analyze models of sex-specific evolutionary divergence under directional and cyclic environmental change, and consider the impact of genetic correlations on long-run patterns of sex-specific adaptation. We find that environmental change often aligns directional selection between the sexes, even when they have divergent phenotypic optima. Nevertheless, some forms of environmental change generate persistent sexually antagonistic selection that is difficult to resolve. Our results reinforce recent empirical observations that changing environmental conditions alleviate conflict between males and females. They also generate new predictions regarding the scope for sexually antagonistic selection and its resolution in changing environments.
© 2016 The Author(s). Evolution © 2016 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Adaptation; fitness; models/simulations; sex; sexual conflict; trade-offs

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27477129     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  20 in total

1.  Quantifying maladaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Genevieve Matthews; Sandra Hangartner; David G Chapple; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.

Authors:  Xiang-Yi Li; Luke Holman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Debora Goedert; Aaron M Reedy; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Selective harvest focused on sexual signal traits can lead to extinction under directional environmental change.

Authors:  Robert J Knell; Carlos Martínez-Ruiz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The interaction between sex-specific selection and local adaptation in species without separate sexes.

Authors:  Colin Olito; Jessica K Abbott; Crispin Y Jordan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Male and female reproductive fitness costs of an immune response in natural populations.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Male-limited secondary sexual trait interacts with environment in determining female fitness.

Authors:  Anna Maria Skwierzyńska; Jacek Radwan; Agata Plesnar-Bielak
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Meta-analytic evidence that sexual selection improves population fitness.

Authors:  Justin G Cally; Devi Stuart-Fox; Luke Holman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Disruptive natural selection predicts divergence between the sexes during adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.