Literature DB >> 27476842

Intraoperative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring in spinal tumor surgery: sirens or indispensable tools?

Antonino Scibilia1, Carmen Terranova2, Vincenzo Rizzo2, Giovanni Raffa1,3, Adolfo Morelli2, Felice Esposito1, Raffaella Mallamace4, Gaetano Buda4, Alfredo Conti1, Angelo Quartarone2, Antonino Germanò1.   

Abstract

Spinal tumor (ST) surgery carries the risk of new neurological deficits in the postoperative period. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and mapping (IONM) represents an effective method of identifying and monitoring in real time the functional integrity of both the spinal cord (SC) and the nerve roots (NRs). Despite consensus favoring the use of IONM in ST surgery, in this era of evidence-based medicine, there is still a need to demonstrate the effective role of IONM in ST surgery in achieving an oncological cure, optimizing patient safety, and considering medicolegal aspects. Thus, neurosurgeons are asked to establish which techniques are considered indispensable. In the present study, the authors focused on the rationale for and the accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) of IONM in ST surgery in light of more recent evidence in the literature, with specific emphasis on the role of IONM in reducing the incidence of postoperative neurological deficits. This review confirms the role of IONM as a useful tool in the workup for ST surgery. Individual monitoring and mapping techniques are clearly not sufficient to account for the complex function of the SC and NRs. Conversely, multimodal IONM is highly sensitive and specific for anticipating neurological injury during ST surgery and represents an important tool for preserving neuronal structures and achieving an optimal postoperative functional outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCR = bulbocavernosus reflex; CST = corticospinal tract; D wave; D wave = direct wave; DCM = dorsal column mapping; DNS = direct nerve stimulation; EXDST = extradural spinal tumor; IDEMSCT = intradural-extramedullary SC tumor; IMSCT = intramedullary spinal cord tumor; IONM = intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and mapping; MEP = motor evoked potential; NPV = negative predictive value; NR = nerve root; PPV = positive predictive value; SC = spinal cord; SSEP = somatosensory evoked potential; ST = spinal tumor; electromyography; frEMG = free-running electromyography; intraoperative monitoring; mIONM = multimodal IONM; mMEP = muscle MEP; motor evoked potential; somatosensory evoked potential; spinal tumor surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27476842     DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  17 in total

1.  Spinal hemangioblastomas: analysis of surgical outcome and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Alberto Feletti; Alessandro Boaro; Davide Giampiccolo; Giorgio Casoli; Fabio Moscolo; Massimiliano Ferrara; Francesco Sala; Giacomo Pavesi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potentials for cervical spine intraoperative monitoring complications: systematic review and illustrative case of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Francisco Revilla-Pacheco; Shoko Watanabe; Joel Rodríguez-Reyes; Claudia Sánchez-Torres; Paul Shkurovich-Bialik; Tenoch Herrada-Pineda; Pamela Rodríguez-Salgado; Juvenal Franco-Granillo; Martín Calderón-Juárez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Sodium Fluorescein for Spinal Intradural Tumors.

Authors:  Semih Kivanc Olguner; Ali Arslan; Vedat Açık; İsmail İstemen; Mehmet Can; Yurdal Gezercan; Ali İhsan Ökten
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  The Significance of Motor Evoked Potential Changes and Utility of Multimodality Intraoperative Monitoring in Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of Consecutive Cases at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Joseph N Frazzetta; Ryan C Hofler; William Adams; Michael J Schneck; G Alexander Jones
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-13

5.  Intraoperative Monitoring for Cauda Equina Tumors: Surgical Outcomes and Neurophysiological Data Accrued Over 10 Years.

Authors:  Subum Lee; Dae-Chul Cho; Seung Chul Rhim; Byung Jou Lee; Seok Ho Hong; Yong Seo Koo; Jin Hoon Park
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-06-30

6.  A case of chronic dysaesthesia in the torso and upper limbs: lessons from a cervical spinal cord subependymoma.

Authors:  Andreas K Demetriades; Hamzah A Soleiman; Susan Kealey
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2021-06-24

7.  The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases.

Authors:  Tarik Ibrahim; Oliver Mrowczynski; Omar Zalatimo; Vernon Chinchilli; Jonas Sheehan; Robert Harbaugh; Elias Rizk
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-11-19

8.  Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials According to Tumor Types.

Authors:  Taeha Park; Jinyoung Park; Yoon Ghil Park; Joowon Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-08-31

9.  Mapping and Preserving the Visuospatial Network by repetitive nTMS and DTI Tractography in Patients With Right Parietal Lobe Tumors.

Authors:  Giovanni Raffa; Maria Catena Quattropani; Giuseppina Marzano; Antonello Curcio; Vincenzo Rizzo; Gabriella Sebestyén; Viktória Tamás; András Büki; Antonino Germanò
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Correlation of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Parameters and Outcomes in Patients with Intramedullary Tumors.

Authors:  Leonardo Gilmone Ruschel; Afonso Aragão; Matheus Fernandes de Oliveira; Jerônimo Buzetti Milano; Mauricio Coelho Neto; Ricardo Ramina
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.