Literature DB >> 27475628

Analysis of embryonic development in the unsequenced axolotl: Waves of transcriptomic upheaval and stability.

Peng Jiang1, Jeffrey D Nelson1, Ning Leng1, Michael Collins1, Scott Swanson1, Colin N Dewey2, James A Thomson3, Ron Stewart4.   

Abstract

The axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) has long been the subject of biological research, primarily owing to its outstanding regenerative capabilities. However, the gene expression programs governing its embryonic development are particularly underexplored, especially when compared to other amphibian model species. Therefore, we performed whole transcriptome polyA+ RNA sequencing experiments on 17 stages of embryonic development. As the axolotl genome is unsequenced and its gene annotation is incomplete, we built de novo transcriptome assemblies for each stage and garnered functional annotation by comparing expressed contigs with known genes in other organisms. In evaluating the number of differentially expressed genes over time, we identify three waves of substantial transcriptome upheaval each followed by a period of relative transcriptome stability. The first wave of upheaval is between the one and two cell stage. We show that the number of differentially expressed genes per unit time is higher between the one and two cell stage than it is across the mid-blastula transition (MBT), the period of zygotic genome activation. We use total RNA sequencing to demonstrate that the vast majority of genes with increasing polyA+ signal between the one and two cell stage result from polyadenylation rather than de novo transcription. The first stable phase begins after the two cell stage and continues until the mid-blastula transition, corresponding with the pre-MBT phase of transcriptional quiescence in amphibian development. Following this is a peak of differential gene expression corresponding with the activation of the zygotic genome and a phase of transcriptomic stability from stages 9-11. We observe a third wave of transcriptomic change between stages 11 and 14, followed by a final stable period. The last two stable phases have not been documented in amphibians previously and correspond to times of major morphogenic change in the axolotl embryo: gastrulation and neurulation. These results yield new insights into global gene expression during early stages of amphibian embryogenesis and will help to further develop the axolotl as a model species for developmental and regenerative biology.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axolotl; Development; Transcriptome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27475628      PMCID: PMC5272911          DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  54 in total

Review 1.  Towards a cellular and molecular understanding of neurulation.

Authors:  J F Colas; G C Schoenwolf
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.780

2.  Time, space and the vertebrate body axis.

Authors:  A J Durston
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  EBSeq: an empirical Bayes hierarchical model for inference in RNA-seq experiments.

Authors:  Ning Leng; John A Dawson; James A Thomson; Victor Ruotti; Anna I Rissman; Bart M G Smits; Jill D Haag; Michael N Gould; Ron M Stewart; Christina Kendziorski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.

Authors:  W R Pearson; D J Lipman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage.

Authors:  J Newport; M Kirschner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Role of soluble myosin in cortical contractions of Xenopus eggs.

Authors:  K Christensen; R Sauterer; R W Merriam
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Jul 12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The zebrafish transcriptome during early development.

Authors:  Liselotte Vesterlund; Hong Jiao; Per Unneberg; Outi Hovatta; Juha Kere
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.978

8.  RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome.

Authors:  Bo Li; Colin N Dewey
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Transcriptome profile of the green odorous frog (Odorrana margaretae).

Authors:  Liang Qiao; Weizhao Yang; Jinzhong Fu; Zhaobin Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Nanog, Pou5f1 and SoxB1 activate zygotic gene expression during the maternal-to-zygotic transition.

Authors:  Miler T Lee; Ashley R Bonneau; Carter M Takacs; Ariel A Bazzini; Kate R DiVito; Elizabeth S Fleming; Antonio J Giraldez
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  13 in total

1.  A Novel Approach to Single Cell RNA-Sequence Analysis Facilitates In Silico Gene Reporting of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Cell Types.

Authors:  M Joseph Phillips; Peng Jiang; Sara Howden; Patrick Barney; Jee Min; Nathaniel W York; Li-Fang Chu; Elizabeth E Capowski; Abigail Cash; Shivani Jain; Katherine Barlow; Tasnia Tabassum; Ron Stewart; Bikash R Pattnaik; James A Thomson; David M Gamm
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 2.  Advances in Decoding Axolotl Limb Regeneration.

Authors:  Brian J Haas; Jessica L Whited
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Now that We Got There, What Next?

Authors:  Elly M Tanaka
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2023

4.  A Tissue-Mapped Axolotl De Novo Transcriptome Enables Identification of Limb Regeneration Factors.

Authors:  Donald M Bryant; Kimberly Johnson; Tia DiTommaso; Timothy Tickle; Matthew Brian Couger; Duygu Payzin-Dogru; Tae J Lee; Nicholas D Leigh; Tzu-Hsing Kuo; Francis G Davis; Joel Bateman; Sevara Bryant; Anna R Guzikowski; Stephanie L Tsai; Steven Coyne; William W Ye; Robert M Freeman; Leonid Peshkin; Clifford J Tabin; Aviv Regev; Brian J Haas; Jessica L Whited
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  The amazing and anomalous axolotls as scientific models.

Authors:  Carly J Adamson; Nikolas Morrison-Welch; Crystal D Rogers
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.842

6.  Trendy: segmented regression analysis of expression dynamics in high-throughput ordered profiling experiments.

Authors:  Rhonda Bacher; Ning Leng; Li-Fang Chu; Zijian Ni; James A Thomson; Christina Kendziorski; Ron Stewart
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  AP-1cFos/JunB/miR-200a regulate the pro-regenerative glial cell response during axolotl spinal cord regeneration.

Authors:  Keith Z Sabin; Peng Jiang; Micah D Gearhart; Ron Stewart; Karen Echeverri
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-03-06

8.  Large-scale variation in single nucleotide polymorphism density within the laboratory axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum).

Authors:  Nataliya Timoshevskaya; S Randal Voss; Caitlin N Labianca; Cassity R High; Jeramiah J Smith
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.780

9.  Virtual Genome Walking across the 32 Gb Ambystoma mexicanum genome; assembling gene models and intronic sequence.

Authors:  Teri Evans; Andrew D Johnson; Matthew Loose
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Experimentally induced metamorphosis in highly regenerative axolotl (ambystoma mexicanum) under constant diet restructures microbiota.

Authors:  Turan Demircan; Guvanch Ovezmyradov; Berna Yıldırım; İlknur Keskin; Ayşe Elif İlhan; Ece Cana Fesçioğlu; Gürkan Öztürk; Süleyman Yıldırım
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.