Literature DB >> 27474914

The occipital place area represents first-person perspective motion information through scenes.

Frederik S Kamps1, Vishal Lall1, Daniel D Dilks2.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies have identified multiple scene-selective regions in human cortex, but the precise role each region plays in scene processing is not yet clear. It was recently hypothesized that two regions, the occipital place area (OPA) and the retrosplenial complex (RSC), play a direct role in navigation, while a third region, the parahippocampal place area (PPA), does not. Some evidence suggests a further division of labor even among regions involved in navigation: While RSC is thought to support navigation through the broader environment, OPA may be involved in navigation through the immediately visible environment, although this role for OPA has never been tested. Here we predict that OPA represents first-person perspective motion information through scenes, a critical cue for such "visually-guided navigation", consistent with the hypothesized role for OPA. Response magnitudes were measured in OPA (as well as RSC and PPA) to i) video clips of first-person perspective motion through scenes ("Dynamic Scenes"), and ii) static images taken from these same movies, rearranged such that first-person perspective motion could not be inferred ("Static Scenes"). As predicted, OPA responded significantly more to the Dynamic than Static Scenes, relative to both RSC and PPA. The selective response in OPA to Dynamic Scenes was not due to domain-general motion sensitivity or to low-level information inherited from early visual regions. Taken together, these findings suggest the novel hypothesis that OPA may support visually-guided navigation, insofar as first-person perspective motion information is useful for such navigation, while RSC and PPA support other aspects of navigation and scene recognition.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OPA; Parahippocampal place area (PPA); Retrosplenial complex (RSC); Scene perception; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27474914      PMCID: PMC5042880          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  42 in total

Review 1.  Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy.

Authors:  G K Aguirre; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  J Sergent; S Ohta; B MacDonald
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Whitney E Parker; Alana M Feiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Motion parallax links visual motion areas and scene regions.

Authors:  Andreas Schindler; Andreas Bartels
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Thinking outside the box: rectilinear shapes selectively activate scene-selective cortex.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Cesar E Echavarria; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Egocentric disorientation following bilateral parietal lobe damage.

Authors:  Barbara A Wilson; Emma Berry; Fergus Gracey; Claire Harrison; Isabel Stow; Jamie Macniven; Julia Weatherley; Andrew W Young
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 9.  The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings.

Authors:  E A Maguire
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2001-07

10.  Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor-related tasks: a PET study.

Authors:  Francine Malouin; Carol L Richards; Philip L Jackson; Francine Dumas; Julien Doyon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  13 in total

1.  Places in the Brain: Bridging Layout and Object Geometry in Scene-Selective Cortex.

Authors:  Moira R Dillon; Andrew S Persichetti; Elizabeth S Spelke; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Distinct representations of spatial and categorical relationships across human scene-selective cortex.

Authors:  Andrew S Persichetti; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Three cortical scene systems and their development.

Authors:  Daniel D Dilks; Frederik S Kamps; Andrew S Persichetti
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 24.482

Review 4.  The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Eva Zita Patai; Joshua B Julian; Hugo J Spiers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Dissociable Neural Systems for Recognizing Places and Navigating through Them.

Authors:  Andrew S Persichetti; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Late Development of Navigationally Relevant Motion Processing in the Occipital Place Area.

Authors:  Frederik S Kamps; Jordan E Pincus; Samaher F Radwan; Stephanie Wahab; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  The Neurocognitive Basis of Spatial Reorientation.

Authors:  Joshua B Julian; Alexandra T Keinath; Steven A Marchette; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Two scene navigation systems dissociated by deliberate versus automatic processing.

Authors:  Shosuke Suzuki; Frederik S Kamps; Daniel D Dilks; Michael T Treadway
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.644

9.  A functional dissociation of face-, body- and scene-selective brain areas based on their response to moving and static stimuli.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Geena Ianni; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Occipital Place Area Biases Gaze During Scene Viewing.

Authors:  George L Malcolm; Edward H Silson; Jennifer R Henry; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.