Literature DB >> 31956027

Late Development of Navigationally Relevant Motion Processing in the Occipital Place Area.

Frederik S Kamps1, Jordan E Pincus1, Samaher F Radwan1, Stephanie Wahab1, Daniel D Dilks2.   

Abstract

Human adults flawlessly and effortlessly navigate boundaries and obstacles in the immediately visible environment, a process we refer to as "visually guided navigation." Neuroimaging work in adults suggests this ability involves the occipital place area (OPA) [1, 2]-a scene-selective region in the dorsal stream that selectively represents information necessary for visually guided navigation [3-9]. Despite progress in understanding the neural basis of visually guided navigation, however, little is known about how this system develops. Is navigationally relevant information processing present in the first few years of life? Or does this information processing only develop after many years of experience? Although a handful of studies have found selective responses to scenes (relative to objects) in OPA in childhood [10-13], no study has explored how more specific navigationally relevant information processing emerges in this region. Here, we do just that by measuring OPA responses to first-person perspective motion information-a proxy for the visual experience of actually navigating the immediate environment-using fMRI in 5- and 8-year-old children. We found that, although OPA already responded more to scenes than objects by age 5, responses to first-person perspective motion were not yet detectable at this same age and rather only emerged by age 8. This protracted development was specific to first-person perspective motion through scenes, not motion on faces or objects, and was not found in other scene-selective regions (the parahippocampal place area or retrosplenial complex) or a motion-selective region (MT). These findings therefore suggest that navigationally relevant information processing in OPA undergoes prolonged development across childhood.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OPA; development; fMRI; high-level vision; motion processing; navigation; parahippocampal place area; retrosplenial complex; scene perception; transverse occipital sulcus

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31956027      PMCID: PMC7730705          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  53 in total

1.  The "visual cliff".

Authors:  E J GIBSON; R D WALK
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.142

2.  The developing role of transparent surfaces in children's spatial representation.

Authors:  Eugenia Gianni; Laura De Zorzi; Sang Ah Lee
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Visually guided navigation: head-mounted eye-tracking of natural locomotion in children and adults.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation.

Authors:  L Hermer; E Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-12

5.  Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory.

Authors:  Golijeh Golarai; Dara G Ghahremani; S Whitfield-Gabrieli; Allan Reiss; Jennifer L Eberhardt; John D E Gabrieli; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Navigation and the developing brain.

Authors:  Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Vision for perception and vision for action: normal and unusual development.

Authors:  Daniel D Dilks; James E Hoffman; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-07

8.  Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories.

Authors:  K Suzanne Scherf; Marlene Behrmann; Kate Humphreys; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-07

9.  Sensitivity of human visual and vestibular cortical regions to egomotion-compatible visual stimulation.

Authors:  Velia Cardin; Andrew T Smith
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Development of the hippocampal cognitive map in preweanling rats.

Authors:  Tom J Wills; Francesca Cacucci; Neil Burgess; John O'Keefe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Three cortical scene systems and their development.

Authors:  Daniel D Dilks; Frederik S Kamps; Andrew S Persichetti
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 24.482

2.  A network linking scene perception and spatial memory systems in posterior cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Adam Steel; Madeleine M Billings; Edward H Silson; Caroline E Robertson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Two scene navigation systems dissociated by deliberate versus automatic processing.

Authors:  Shosuke Suzuki; Frederik S Kamps; Daniel D Dilks; Michael T Treadway
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.644

4.  Using child-friendly movie stimuli to study the development of face, place, and object regions from age 3 to 12 years.

Authors:  Frederik S Kamps; Hilary Richardson; N Apurva Ratan Murty; Nancy Kanwisher; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.399

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.