| Literature DB >> 27473461 |
Iolanda Muntean1, Theodora Benedek2, Mihaela Melinte3, Carmen Suteu4,5, Rodica Togãnel1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular function has been identified as an important prognostic factor in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The aim of the study was to assess the deformation pattern and prognostic value of right ventricular longitudinal strain in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Deformation pattern; Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Right ventricle; Strain
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27473461 PMCID: PMC4966806 DOI: 10.1186/s12947-016-0074-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Clinical and laboratory (BNP level) characteristics of normal controls and PAH patients
| Variable | Control ( | PAH patients ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 10.97 ± 3.48 | 11.07 ± 3.44 | 0.821 |
| Male (%) | 10 (47.61 %) | 11 (44.00 %) | 1.000 |
| H (cm) | 147.50 (133.25,156.75) | 136 (119.00,147.00) | 0.081 |
| W (kg) | 42.15 ± 18.15 | 29.95 ± 12.07 | 0.010 |
| BSA (m2) | 1.29 ± 0.36 | 1.05 ± 0.27 | 0.012 |
| BMI (m/kg2) | 18.31 ± 3.48 | 15.53 ± 2.97 | 0.016 |
| 6MWD (m) | 480.35 ± 55.03 | 413.66 ± 75.31 | 0.001 |
| SpO2 before 6MWT (%) | 98.00 (95.20,98.90) | 85.71 ± 9.52 | 0.0001 |
| SpO2 after 6MWT (%) | 98.00 (97.00,99.00) | 75.80 ± 15.59 | 0.0001 |
| HR before 6MWT (bpm) | 86.15 ± 11.79 | 98.90 ± 14.38 | 0.190 |
| HR after 6MWT (bpm) | 109.20 ± 14.84 | 114.90 ± 16.09 | 0.246 |
| WHO Functional class | NA | 0/15/9/1 | |
| BNP level (pg/ml) | 9.00 (10.48,16.34) | 25.85 (27.98,80.28) | 0.005 |
| PAH type | |||
| Idiopathic | NA | 5 (20 %) | NA |
| Ventricular septal defect | NA | 12 (48 %) | NA |
| Atrioventricular septal defect | NA | 5 (20 %) | NA |
| Truncus arteriosus communis | NA | 3 (12 %) | NA |
| Medication no(%) | |||
| Sildenafil | NA | 5 (20 %) | NA |
| Bosentan | NA | 13 (52 %) | NA |
| Combination (Sildenafil + Bosentan) | NA | 7 (28 %) | NA |
Data are presented as means ± SD or median (25th, 75th percentiles) or as numbers (percentages)
BMI body mass index, BNP brain natriuretic peptide, BSA body surface area, H height, HR heart rate, PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, SpO oxygen saturation, W weight, 6MWD 6-min walk distance
Fig. 12D speckle-tracking strain image of RV. LpsS in different segments. a control group; b PAH group. LpsS, longitudinal peak systolic strain; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; RV, right ventricle
Comparison of conventional echocardiographic parameters between normal controls and PAH patients
| Variable | Control ( | PAH ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| PAPm (mmHg) | NA | 62.83 ± 17.42 | NA |
| TR (mmHg) | NA | 93.76 ± 24.52 | NA |
| sRV pressure (mmHg) | NA | 104.80 ± 30.82 | NA |
| Pericardial effusion | NA | 7/25 (28 %) | NA |
| RV-FAC (%) | 45.36 ± 5.60 | 37.24 ± 13.12 | 0.008 |
| Indexed RV end-diastolic area (cm2) | 9.82 (9.23,12.05) | 15.88 ± 5.07 | 0.0001 |
| Indexed RV end-systolic area (cm2) | 5.79 ± 1.18 | 10.22 ± 4.69 | 0.0001 |
| RV MPI | 0.12 ± 0.07 | 0.32 (0.24,0.51) | 0.0001 |
| TAPSE (cm) | 2.19 ± 0.47 | 1.79 ± 0.60 | 0.019 |
| RV S/D ratio | 0.82 (0.81,1.03) | 1.30 ± 0.33 | 0.0001 |
| Indexed RA area (cm2) | 8.41 ± 1.32 | 11.87 (9.53,14,57) | 0.0001 |
| Tej (ms) | 319.01 ± 33.45 | 273.05 ± 31.04 | 0.0001 |
| LV-EI | 1.02 (0.97,1.04) | 1.33 (1.21,1.56) | 0.0001 |
| S’ (cm/s) | 13.62 ± 1.78 | 11.75 ± 3.53 | 0.026 |
| LV-EF | 69.00 ± 4.71 | 71.20 ± 9.88 | 0.330 |
Data are presented as means ± SD or median (25th, 75th percentiles)
FAC fractional area change, LV-EF left ventricular ejection fraction, LV-EI left ventricular eccentricity index, MPI myocardial performance index, PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, PAPm mean pulmonary arterial pressure, RA right atrium, RV right ventricle, S’ tricuspid annular systolic velocity, S/D ratio systolic/diastolic ratio, sRV pressure systolic right ventricular pressure, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, Tej pulmonary ejection time, TR tricuspid regurgitation
Comparison of longitudinal strain indices in different RV segments between control group and PAH children
| Variable | Control group ( | PAH children ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| RV free wall | −24.72 ± 3.48 | −15.60 ± 3.40 | 0.0001 |
| Basal RV free wall | −28.19 ± 5.47 | −12.80 ± 4.26 | 0.0001 |
| Mid RV free wall | −26.00 ± 4.45 | −17.52 ± 5.20 | 0.0001 |
| Apical RV free wall | −20.00 ± 7.58 | −16.48 ± 4.96 | 0.077 |
| Apex | −23.66 ± 5.95 | −17.76 ± 4.47 | 0.0001 |
| IVS | |||
| Apical IVS | −27.33 ± 5.59 | −19.00 (−20.50,−16.00) | 0.0001 |
| Mid IVS | −24.38 ± 5.34 | −17.36 ± 5.70 | 0.0001 |
| Basal IVS | −17.00 ± 4.18 | NA | NA |
|
| |||
| RV free wall | −1.44 ± 0.09 | −1.09 ± 0.15 | 0.0001 |
| Basal RV free wall | −1.61 ± 0.19 | −1.00 ± 0.15 | 0.0001 |
| Mid RV free wall | −1.50 ± 0.17 | −1.23 ± 0.31 | 0.001 |
| Apical RV free wall | −1.21 ± 0.18 | −1.04 ± 0.16 | 0.002 |
| Apex | −1.28 ± 0.26 | −1.09 ± 0.19 | 0.009 |
| IVS | |||
| Apical IVS | −1.30 (−1.60,−1.22) | −1.21 ± 0.26 | 0.016 |
| Mid IVS | −1.45 ± 0.32 | −1.11 ± 0.30 | 0.001 |
| Basal IVS | −1.14 ± 0.24 | NA | NA |
Data are presented as means ± SD or median (25th, 75th percentiles)
c control, IVS interventricular septum, LpsS longitudinal peak systolic strain, LpsSR longitudinal peak systolic strain rate, NA no available, PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, RV right ventricle
Fig. 2Comparison between controls and PAH patients regarding 2D strain indices of RV free wall; a LpsS b LpsSR. c, control; LpsS, longitudinal peak systolic strain; LpsSR, longitudinal peak systolic strain rate; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; RV, right ventricle; *p < 0.05
Fig. 3Comparison between control group and PAH patients regarding 2D strain measurements of RV free wall segments: basal, mid and apical. a LpsS; b LpsSR. LpsS, longitudinal peak systolic strain; LpsSR, longitudinal peak systolic strain rate; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; RV, right ventricle; * PAH vs control group, p < 0.05
Comparison of clinical, BNP level, conventional echocardiographic parameters, and longitudinal strain values (LpsS and LpsSR) in different RV segments in two PAH groups: non-worsening and worsening
| Variable | Non-worsening | Worsening |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 6MWD (m) | 416.41 ± 68.72 | 380.90 ± 104.00 | 0.341 |
| SpO2 before 6MWT (%) | 86.00 ± 11.11 | 84.30 ± 7.83 | 0.689 |
| SpO2 after 6MWT (%) | 77.41 ± 18.22 | 74.50 ± 11.53 | 0.667 |
| WHO Functional class | 2.38 ± 0.50 | 2.50 ± 0.67 | 0.631 |
| BNP0 level (pg/ml) | 30.53 ± 37.03 | 82.01 ± 74.80 | 0.039 |
| PAPm (mmHg) | 61.53 ± 18.25 | 64.36 ± 17.13 | 0.701 |
| TR (mmHg) | 91.23 ± 31.74 | 96.50 ± 14.05 | 0.602 |
| sRV pressure (mmHg) | 98.61 ± 40.41 | 111.50 ± 14.05 | 0.297 |
| Pericardial effusion | 2/13 (8 %) | 5/12 (20 %) | 0.200 |
| RV-FAC (%) | 41.07 ± 15.10 | 33.08 ± 9.51 | 0.131 |
| RV MPI | 0.26 (0.24,0.39) | 0.35 (0.29,0.59) | 0.129 |
| TAPSE (cm) | 1.93 ± 0.59 | 1.64 ± 0.61 | 0.247 |
| RV S/D ratio | 1.24 ± 0.28 | 1.36 ± 0.39 | 0.367 |
| Indexed RA area (cm2) | 12.63 ± 3.33 | 15.35 ± 15.70 | 0.547 |
| Tej (ms) | 280.50 ± 31.95 | 264.98 ± 29.18 | 0.219 |
| LV-EI | 1.31 ± 0.17 | 1.56 ± 0.26 | 0.010 |
| S’ (cm/s) | 12.83 ± 3.34 | 10.58 ± 3.50 | 0.114 |
| LV-EF | 71.76 ± 11.07 | 70.58 ± 8.86 | 0.771 |
|
| |||
| RV free wall | −17.38 ± 2.51 | −13.66 ± 3.24 | 0.004 |
| Basal RV free wall | −12.69 ± 4.64 | −12.91 ± 4.01 | 0.899 |
| Mid RV free wall | −20.76 ± 4.62 | −14.00 ± 3.13 | 0.0001 |
| Apical RV free wall | −18.69 ± 4.00 | −14.08 ± 4.92 | 0.017 |
| Apex | −19.15 ± 4.25 | −16.25 ± 4.37 | 0.106 |
| IVS | |||
| Apical IVS | −19.69 ± 5.49 | −19.00 (−22.00,−13.00) | 0.337 |
| Mid IVS | −18.30 ± 4.76 | −16.33 ± 6.63 | 0.399 |
| Basal IVS | NA | NA | NA |
|
| |||
| RV free wall | −1.16 ± 0.12 | −1.01 ± 0.13 | 0.008 |
| Basal RV free wall | −1.00 ± 0.19 | −1.00 ± 0.09 | 0.956 |
| Mid RV free wall | −1.37 ± 0.27 | −1.07 ± 0.29 | 0.013 |
| Apical RV free wall | −1.11 ± 0.12 | −0.97 ± 0.16 | 0.090 |
| Apex | −1.15 ± 0.19 | −1.04 ± 0.18 | 0.166 |
| IVS | |||
| Apical IVS | −1.21 ± 0.32 | −1.20 ± 0.20 | 0.896 |
| Mid IVS | −1.17 ± 0.27 | −1.05 ± 0.34 | 0.372 |
| Basal IVS | NA | NA | NA |
Data are presented as means ± SD or median (25th, 75th percentiles) or as numbers (percentages)
BNP brain natriuretic peptide, FAC fractional area change, IVS interventricular septum, LpsS longitudinal peak systolic strain, LpsSR longitudinal peak systolic strain rate, LV-EF left ventricular ejection fraction, LV-EI left ventricular eccentricity index, MPI myocardial performance index, NA no available, PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, PAPm mean pulmonary arterial pressure, RA right atrium, RV right ventricle, S’ tricuspid annular systolic velocity, S/D ratio systolic/diastolic ratio, SpO oxygen saturation, sRV pressure systolic right ventricular pressure, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, Tej pulmonary ejection time, TR tricuspid regurgitation, 6MWD 6-min walk distance
Fig. 4Comparison between control group, non-worsening PAH patients and worsening PAH patients regarding 2D strain measurements of RV free wall segments: basal, mid and apical. a LpsS; b LpsSR. LpsS, longitudinal peak systolic strain;LpsSR, longitudinal peak systolic strain rate non-w, non-worsening; PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension; RV, right ventricle; w, worsening; *non-w. or w. PAH vs control; ** w. vs non-w. PAH patients; p < 0.05
Multivariable logistic regression analysis for prediction of worsening in PAH patients
| Variable | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio | 95 % CI |
| |
| BNP | 1.027 | 0.995–1.059 | 0.097 |
| LV EI | 0.082 | 0.000–49.076 | 0.444 |
| Mid RV free wall LpsS | 0.458 | 0.217–0.967 | 0.041 |
| Mid RV free wall LpsSR | 0.084 | 0.000–62.398 | 0.462 |
| Apical RV free wall LpsS | 1.003 | 0.694–1.448 | 0.989 |
BNP brain natriuretic peptide, LpsS longitudinal peak systolic strain, LpsSR longitudinal peak systolic strain rate, LV-EI left ventricular eccentricity index, PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, RV right ventricle
Fig. 5Receiver-operator characteristic analysis. The optimum cut-off value for Mid RV free wall LpsS to predict clinical worsening was −18.50 %; the sensitivity and specificity were 91.7 and 30.8 %. The area under curve was 0.88 ± 0.06 (95 % CI: 0.75–1.00, p = 0.001)