Literature DB >> 27471212

Factors Associated With Trunnionosis in the Metal-on-Metal Pinnacle Hip.

Harry S Hothi1, Antti P Eskelinen2, Reshid Berber1, Olli S Lainiala2, Teemu P S Moilanen2, John A Skinner1, Alister J Hart1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trunnionosis of the tapered head-stem junction of total hip arthroplasties, either through corrosion or mechanical wear, has been implicated in early implant failure. Retrieval analysis of large numbers of failed implants can help us better understand the factors that influence damage at this interface.
METHODS: In this study, we examined 120 retrieved total hip arthroplasties of one bearing design, the 36-mm diameter metal-on-metal, DePuy Pinnacle, that had been paired with 3 different stems. We measured material loss of the bearing and head-trunnion taper surfaces and collected clinical and component data for each case. We then used multiple linear regression analysis to determine which factors influenced the rate of taper material loss.
RESULTS: We found 4 significant variables: (1) longer time to revision (P = .004), (2) the use of a 12/14 taper for the head-trunnion junction (P < .001), (3) decreased bearing surface wear (P = .003), and (4) vertical femoral offset (P = .05). These together explained 29% of the variability in taper material loss.
CONCLUSION: Our most important finding is the effect of trunnion design. Of the 3 types studied, we found that S-ROM design was the most successful at minimizing trunnionosis.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corrosion; material loss; metal-on-metal; retrieval; taper

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27471212     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Five Hundred Fifty-five Retrieved Metal-on-metal Hip Replacements of a Single Design Show a Wide Range of Wear, Surface Features, and Histopathologic Reactions.

Authors:  Sang-Hyun Park; Zhen Lu; Robert S Hastings; Patricia A Campbell; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Letter to the Editor: Five Hundred Fifty-five Retrieved Metal-on-metal Hip Replacements of a Single Design Show a Wide Range of Wear, Surface Features, and Histopathologic Reactions.

Authors:  David J Langton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Pinnacle Ultamet metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty survivorship: average 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kristen LaHaise; Daniel Mandell; Samuel Golenbock; Kassandra Hopkins; David Mattingly
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Head size in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georgios Tsikandylakis; Maziar Mohaddes; Peter Cnudde; Antti Eskelinen; Johan Kärrholm; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

5.  Wear performance of retrieved metal-on-metal Pinnacle hip arthroplasties implanted before and after 2007.

Authors:  S Bergiers; H S Hothi; J Henckel; A Eskelinen; J Skinner; A Hart
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 6.  Trunnion corrosion: what surgeons need to know in 2018.

Authors:  J R Berstock; M R Whitehouse; C P Duncan
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  A Case Report and Literature Review to Aid in the Management of Trunnion Failure in Hip Arthroplasty Patients: Can Trunnionosis and Prosthetic Joint Infection Co-Exist?

Authors:  Vivek Jagadale
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-08-31

8.  Comparison of the long-term cause of failure and survivorship of four hundred and twenty seven metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: resurfacing versus large head total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michele Palazzuolo; Alexander Antoniadis; Leilani Delaune; Inès Tornare; Julien Wegrzyn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.075

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.