| Literature DB >> 27470661 |
Giulia Poggi1, Susann Boretius2,3, Wiebke Möbius4, Nicole Moschny1, Jürgen Baudewig2,3, Torben Ruhwedel4, Imam Hassouna1, Georg L Wieser4, Hauke B Werner4, Sandra Goebbels4, Klaus-Armin Nave5,6, Hannelore Ehrenreich7,8.
Abstract
Subtle white matter abnormalities have emerged as a hallmark of brain alterations in magnetic resonance imaging or upon autopsy of mentally ill subjects. However, it is unknown whether such reduction of white matter and myelin contributes to any disease-relevant phenotype or simply constitutes an epiphenomenon, possibly even treatment-related. Here, we have re-analyzed Mbp heterozygous mice, the unaffected parental strain of shiverer, a classical neurological mutant. Between 2 and 20 months of age, Mbp(+/-) versus Mbp(+/+) littermates were deeply phenotyped by combining extensive behavioral/cognitive testing with MRI, 1H-MR spectroscopy, electron microscopy, and molecular techniques. Surprisingly, Mbp-dependent myelination was significantly reduced in the prefrontal cortex. We also noticed a mild but progressive hypomyelination of the prefrontal corpus callosum and low-grade inflammation. While most behavioral functions were preserved, Mbp(+/-) mice exhibited defects of sensorimotor gating, as evidenced by reduced prepulse-inhibition, and a late-onset catatonia phenotype. Thus, subtle but primary abnormalities of CNS myelin can be the cause of a persistent cortical network dysfunction including catatonia, features typical of neuropsychiatric conditions. GLIA 2016;64:2025-2040.Entities:
Keywords: Cnp mutant; MRI; catatonia; electron microscopy; myelin basic protein (Mbp) mutant; prepulse inhibition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27470661 PMCID: PMC5129527 DOI: 10.1002/glia.23039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glia ISSN: 0894-1491 Impact factor: 7.452
Figure 1Myelin gene expression (mRNA, protein) in prefrontal cortex and brainstem of Mbp versus Mbp mice at 3 different ages. A: Mbp/Mbp, B: Cnp/Cnp, C: Plp/Plp. N = 4 per group; 2‐sided t‐tests, mean ± SEM presented.
Figure 2Hypomyelination phenotype in the corpus callosum detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electron microscopy (EM). A: Sagittal MRI pictures illustrating subtle white matter reduction in CC (corpus callosum) and CB (cerebellum) of Mbp versus Mbp mice. B: Quantification of corpus callosum MRI data of 6 and 18 months old Mbp versus Mbp, mice demonstrating reduction in volume, as well as in MTSAT and MTR, and increase in T1 relaxation, together consistent with a discrete hypomyelination phenotype in Mbp versus Mbp mice. N numbers are given in the bars; 2‐sided t‐tests, mean ± SEM presented. C: EM data of 20 month‐old mice, showing in Mbp mice borderline reduced overall myelin sheath thickness, which reaches significance in small caliber axons. No changes are seen in % of non‐myelinated axons, inner tongue size, or mean axon calibers. A = axon diameter; M = myelin + axon diameter; T = inner tongue + axon diameter; t‐ratio = A/T; g‐ratio = A/A+(M‐T); N = 3 per genotype; 2‐sided t‐tests, mean ± SEM presented.
Brain Volume, Axonal Fiber Structure and White Matter Integrity of Mbp+/‐ and Mbp+/+ Compared by MRI
| 6 months | 18 months | 6 months vs. 18 months ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indices | Brain area |
|
|
|
|
|
| Genotype | Age | Interaction |
| Volumetry (mm3) | Ventricles | 10.73 ± 0.38 | 11.76 ± 0.48 | 0.1 | 11.96 ± 0.53 | 12.57 ± 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.13 | 0.44 | 0.56 |
| Cerebellum | 59.9 ± 0.67 | 61.02 ± 0.64 | 0.24 | 59.16 ± 0.73 | 57.89 ± 1.03 | 0.34 | 0.93 | 0.03 | 0.17 | |
| Olfactory Bulb | 26.27 ± 0.44 | 26.76 ± 0.3 | 0.37 | 27.48 ± 0.28 | 27.07 ± 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.78 | 0.07 | 0.09 | |
| Brainstem | 58.8 ± 1.12 | 52.99 ± 1.77 | 0.01 | 62.35 ± 2.35 | 61.39 ± 2 | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.002 | 0.36 | |
| Brain Matter (excluded the previous) | 315.2 ± 3.92 | 314.4 ± 3.1 | 0.88 | 323.6 ± 2.5 | 314.8 ± 3.81 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.26 | |
| Fractional Anisotropy | Corpus Callosum | 0.34 ± 0.006 | 0.35 ± 0.004 | 0.17 | 0.37 ± 0.008 | 0.36 ± 0.011 | 0.7 | 0.87 | 0.02 | 0.17 |
| Radial Diffusivity (·10−6 mm2/s) | 546 ± 6.3 | 556 ± 1.1 | 0.07 | 506 ± 12 | 516 ± 9.7 | 0.32 | 0.11 | <0.0001 | 0.52 | |
| Axial Diffusivity (·10−6 mm2/s) | 908 ± 11 | 963 ± 12 | 0.03 | 905 ± 15 | 897 ± 13 | 0.71 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |
| Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (·10−6 mm2/s) | 667 ± 7 | 700 ± 11 | 0.01 | 639 ± 12.2 | 619 ± 27 | 0.7 | 0.72 | 0.005 | 0.15 | |
| Magnetization Transfer Ratio | Corpus Callosum | 0.67 ± 0.004 | 0.64 ± 0.003 |
| 0.67 ± 0.002 | 0.65 ± 0.004 |
|
| 0.03 | 0.9 |
| Magnetization Transfer Saturation | 0.05 ± 0.0005 | 0.04 ± 0.0004 |
| 0.06 ± 0.002 | 0.04 ± 0.001 |
|
| 0.0002 | 0.42 | |
| T1 Relaxation | 1353 ± 21 | 1509 ± 19 |
| 1322 ± 88 | 1450 ± 18 |
| 0.005 | 0.36 | 0.78 | |
Bolded P values, “survived” multiple testing adjustment via Bonferroni (MT and DTI: 7 parameters evaluated in one brain region).
Metabolic Alterations in the Brain of Mbp+/‐ Versus Mbp+/+ Mice Measured by 1H‐MRS
| 6 months | 18 months | 6 months vs. 18 months ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolite (mM) | Brain area |
|
|
|
|
|
| Genotype | Age | Interaction |
| Myo‐inositol | Cortex | 3.49 ± 0.12 | 3.62 ± 0.1 | 0.44 | 3.25 ± 0.12 | 3.59 ± 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.36 |
| Corpus Callosum | 3.65 ± 0.06 | 3.77 ± 0.08 | 0.09 | 3.71 ± 0.11 | 4.15 ± 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.016 | 0.06 | 0.16 | |
| Hippocampus | 4.67 ± 0.16 | 4.62 ± 0.22 | 0.85 | 4.63 ± 0.17 | 5.04 ± 0.23 | 0.1 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.26 | |
| Taurine | Cortex | 10.54 ± 0.21 | 11.17 ± 0.34 | 0.17 | 9.21 ± 0.35 | 10.48 ± 0.22 | 0.006 |
|
| 0.27 |
| Corpus Callosum | 10.18 ± 0.16 | 9.848 ± 0.2 | 0.3 | 9.71 ± 0.22 | 10.46 ± 0.15 | 0.007 | 0.26 | 0.7 | 0.004 | |
| Hippocampus | 11.18 ± 0.22 | 11.62 ± 0.35 | 0.28 | 11.6 ± 0.24 | 12.02 ± 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.98 | |
| Choline | Cortex | 1.24 ± 0.04 | 1.4 ± 0.13 | 0.34 | 1.2 ± 0.05 | 1.2 ± 0.04 | 0.49 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.34 |
| Corpus Callosum | 1.2 ± 0.02 | 1.19 ± 0.03 | 0.74 | 1.31 ± 0.06 | 1.32 ± 0.05 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 0.02 | 0.79 | |
| Hippocampus | 1.14 ± 0.04 | 1.2 ± 0.03 | 0.21 | 1.19 ± 0.07 | 1.22 ± 0.06 | 0.98 | 0.42 | 0.53 | 0.75 | |
| tCreatine | Cortex | 7.03 ± 0.16 | 7.44 ± 0.25 | 0.45 | 6.83 ± 0.22 | 7.55 ± 0.08 |
| 0.003 | 0.82 | 0.39 |
| Corpus Callosum | 7.72 ± 0.1 | 7.66 ± 0.11 | 0.77 | 8.07 ± 0.11 | 8.4 ± 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.21 |
| 0.06 | |
| Hippocampus | 8.2 ± 0.12 | 8.33 ± 0.17 | 0.53 | 8.57 ± 0.29 | 8.96 ± 0.21 | 0.06 | 0.24 | 0.025 | 0.56 | |
| tNAA | Cortex | 8.22 ± 0.18 | 8.62 ± 0.14 | 0.1 | 8.27 ± 0.3 | 8.69 ± 0.12 | 0.6 | 0.05 | 0.76 | 0.95 |
| Corpus Callosum | 8.06 ± 0.12 | 7.9 ± 0.11 | 0.48 | 7.99 ± 0.12 | 8.21 ± 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.66 | 0.41 | 0.16 | |
| Hippocampus | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 7.39 ± 0.17 | 0.55 | 7.64 ± 0.14 | 7.87 ± 0.2 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.07 | 0.3 | |
Bolded P values “survived” testing adjustment via Bonferroni (10 comparisons: 5 metabolites and 2 time points per brain region).
Figure 3Low‐grade inflammatory phenotype in the PFC/frontal corpus callosum of . A: Myo‐inositol enhancement in Mbp mice, prominent upon aging; B, C: Iba1+ cell increase in 14 month‐old Mbp mice; D: Representative section scanned for Iba1+ cell counting; E: Elevated TNF‐alpha mRNA expression in 18 month‐old Mbp versus Mbp mice. N numbers given in the bars; 2‐sided t‐tests, mean ± SEM presented. F‐G: Single myelin gene‐dose reductions : Note the highly comparable findings in aging Cnp mice: Increase in myo‐inositol (MRS), and in Iba1+ cells in the frontal corpus callosum. N numbers given in the bars; 2‐sided t‐tests, mean ± SEM presented.[TQ3]
Behavioral Phenotyping of Male Mbp+/‐ Versus Mbp+/+ Mice at 3 and 17 Months of Age
| 3 months | 17 months | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral paradigms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Anxiety and activity | ||||||||||
| Elevated plus maze (time close arm [s]) | 22 | 34 | 176 ± 9 | 166 ± 10 | 0.67 | |||||
| Elevated plus maze (time open arm [s]) | 22 | 34 | 31 ± 5 | 31.28 ± 5 | 0.79 | |||||
| Elevated plus maze (time centre [s]) | 22 | 34 | 75 ± 8 | 78 ± 5 | 0.67 | |||||
| Elevated plus maze (total distance [m]) | 22 | 34 | 10.1 ± 0.3 | 9.46 ± 0.51 | 0.6 | |||||
| Elevated plus maze (average speed [mm/s]) | 22 | 34 | 31.8 ± 1.5 | 33.8 ± 1.2 | 0.31 | |||||
| Open field (total distance [m]) | 22 | 34 | 48 ± 1.6 | 47.6 ± 1.4 | 0.72 | 22 | 33 | 36.43 ± 1.4 | 37.2 ± 1.5 | 0.83 |
| Open field (average velocity [mm/s]) | 22 | 34 | 116.2 ± 3.4 | 115.3 ± 3.4 | 0.6 | 22 | 33 | 87.32 ± 3.4 | 89.13 ± 3.7 | 0.87 |
| Open field (periphery [s]) | 22 | 34 | 341 ± 9 | 341 ± 7 | 0.77 | 22 | 33 | 377 ± 6 | 374 ± 5 | 0.92 |
| Open field (intermediate [s]) | 22 | 34 | 60 ± 7 | 60 ± 5 | 0.71 | 22 | 33 | 33 ± 4 | 34 ± 4 | 0.81 |
| Open field (centre [s]) | 22 | 34 | 19 ± 2 | 19 ± 2 | 0.9 | 22 | 33 | 9 ± 2 | 11 ± 2 | 0.62 |
| Open field (latency to the periphery [s]) | 22 | 34 | 16 ± 4 | 15 ± 2 | 0.21 | 22 | 33 | 27 ± 9 | 30 ± 6 | 0.34 |
| Exploratory behavior | ||||||||||
| Hole board (holes visited [n]) | 22 | 34 | 5 ± 1 | 6 ± 1 | 0.38 | |||||
| Impulsivity | ||||||||||
| Marble burying (marble buried [n]) | 22 | 34 | 7.23 ± 1.14 | 7.1 ± 0.92 | 0.9 | |||||
| Motor learning and coordination | ||||||||||
| Rota‐rod day 1 (latency to fall [s]) | 22 | 34 | 123 ±15 | 140 ± 17 | 0.87 | 22 | 33 | 81 ± 15 | 96 ± 10 | 0.23 |
| Rota‐rod day 2 (latency to fall [s]) | 22 | 34 | 214 ± 18 | 208 ± 15 | 0.79 | |||||
| Muscle strength | ||||||||||
| Grip strength [p] | 22 | 34 | 142 ± 3 | 139 ± 2 | 0.41 | |||||
| Heat/pain perception | ||||||||||
| Hot plate (latency to lick [s]) | 22 | 34 | 15 ± 1 | 16 ± 1 | 0.15 | |||||
| Sight | ||||||||||
| Visual cliff (latency in the “air” [%]) | 22 | 34 | 36 ± 4 | 34 ± 3 | 0.57 | 22 | 33 | 35 ± 4 | 26 ± 4 | 0.11 |
| Olfaction | ||||||||||
| Buried food test (digging latency [s]) | 22 | 34 | 87 ± 21 | 74 ± 13 | 0.88 | |||||
| Hearing | ||||||||||
| Hearing (startle amplitude [AU]) | 22 | 34 | Genotype | 12 | 16 | Genotype | ||||
| Anhedonia | ||||||||||
| Sucrose preference test [%] | 22 | 34 | 74 ± 2 | 74 ± 2 | 0.89 | |||||
| Homecage behavior | ||||||||||
| LABORAS (climbing [s]) | 10 | 16 | 2188 ± 429 | 2480 ± 419 | 0.64 | |||||
| LABORAS (grooming [s]) | 10 | 16 | 5363 ± 463 | 4899 ± 457 | 0.5 | |||||
| LABORAS (locomotion [s]) | 10 | 16 | 2734 ± 295 | 2859 ± 374 | 0.85 | |||||
| LABORAS (drinking [s]) | 10 | 16 | 84.5 ± 23 | 260 ± 56 | 0.12 | |||||
| LABORAS (eating [s]) | 10 | 16 | 2468 ± 362 | 2486 ± 272 | 0.85 | |||||
| LABORAS (scratching [s]) | 10 | 16 | 1065 ± 120 | 869 ± 217 | 0.73 | |||||
| LABORAS (circular movements [s]) | 10 | 16 | 541.5 ± 59.2 | 711.9 ± 107.1 | 0.51 | |||||
| Sociability | ||||||||||
| Three‐chambered social test (sociability [%]) | 22 | 34 | 62 ± 2 | 63 ± 2 | 0.81 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ||
| Learning and memory | 22 | 33 | ||||||||
| Morris water maze, training (escape latency [s]) | 22 | 34 | Genotype | Genotype | ||||||
| Probe trial ‐ time in target zone [%] | 22 | 34 | 41 ± 2 | 45 ± 2 | 0.17 | 22 | 33 | 47 ± 2 | 54 ± 2 | 0.09 |
| Escaping latency ‐ reversal [s] | 22 | 34 | Genotype | 22 | 33 | Genotype | ||||
| Probe trial reversal ‐ time in target zone [%] | 22 | 34 | 33 ± 2 | 32.7 ± 2 | 0.54 | 22 | 33 | 41 ± 2 | 43 ± 2 | 0.3 |
| Novel object recognition (novelty preference [%]) | 22 | 34 | 59 ± 3 | 58 ± 3 | 0.81 | |||||
| Y‐maze (alternation index [#]) | 22 | 34 | 0.7 ± 0.05 | 0.8 ± 0.03 | 0.63 | |||||
Figure 4Behavioral abnormalities of A: Prepulse inhibition of the startle response (PPI), experimental design. B: PPI and C: startle response reduction in Mbp mice. D: Catatonia in old Mbp mice, quantification of time (latency) on the bar; E: Illustrating photograph with typical catatonic posture. N numbers given in the bars; 2‐sided t‐tests, mean ± SEM presented.