Joyce S Ramos1, Lance C Dalleck, Maximiano V Ramos, Fabio Borrani, Llion Roberts, Sjaan Gomersall, Kassia S Beetham, Katrin A Dias, Shelley E Keating, Robert G Fassett, James E Sharman, Jeff S Coombes. 1. aCentre for Research on Exercise, Physical Activity and Health, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia bDepartment of Recreation, Exercise and Sport Science, Western State Colorado University, Gunnison, Colorado, USA cInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, School of Engineering, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand dInstitut des Sciences du Sport de l'Universite de Lausanne (ISSUL) eDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland fMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Decreased aortic reservoir function leads to a rise in aortic reservoir pressure that is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events. Although there is evidence that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) would be useful to improve aortic reservoir pressure, the optimal dose of high-intensity exercise to improve aortic reservoir function has yet to be investigated. Therefore, this study compared the effect of different volumes of HIIT and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on aortic reservoir pressure in participants with the metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS:Fifty individuals with MetS were randomized into one of the following 16-week training programs: MICT [n = 17, 30 min at 60-70% peak heart rate (HRpeak), five times/week]; 4 × 4-min high-intensity interval training (4HIIT) (n = 15, 4 × 4 min bouts at 85-95% HRpeak, interspersed with 3 min of active recovery at 50-70% HRpeak, three times/week); and 1 × 4-min high-intensity interval training (1HIIT) (n = 18, 1 × 4 min bout at 85-95% HRpeak, three times/week). Aortic reservoir pressure was calculated from radial applanation tonometry. RESULTS: Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for a small-to-medium group × time interaction effect on aortic reservoir pressure, indicating a positive adaptation following 1HIIT compared with 4HIIT and MICT [F (2,46) = 2.9, P = 0.07, η = 0.06]. This is supported by our within-group analysis wherein only 1HIIT significantly decreased aortic reservoir pressure from pre to postintervention (pre-post: 1HIIT 33 ± 16 to 31 ± 13, P = 0.03; MICT 29 ± 9-28 ± 8, P = 0.78; 4HIIT 28 ± 10-30 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Three sessions of 4 min of high-intensity exercise per week (12 min/week) was sufficient to improve aortic reservoir pressure, and thus may be a time-efficient exercise modality for reducing cardiovascular risk in individuals with MetS.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Decreased aortic reservoir function leads to a rise in aortic reservoir pressure that is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events. Although there is evidence that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) would be useful to improve aortic reservoir pressure, the optimal dose of high-intensity exercise to improve aortic reservoir function has yet to be investigated. Therefore, this study compared the effect of different volumes of HIIT and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on aortic reservoir pressure in participants with the metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: Fifty individuals with MetS were randomized into one of the following 16-week training programs: MICT [n = 17, 30 min at 60-70% peak heart rate (HRpeak), five times/week]; 4 × 4-min high-intensity interval training (4HIIT) (n = 15, 4 × 4 min bouts at 85-95% HRpeak, interspersed with 3 min of active recovery at 50-70% HRpeak, three times/week); and 1 × 4-min high-intensity interval training (1HIIT) (n = 18, 1 × 4 min bout at 85-95% HRpeak, three times/week). Aortic reservoir pressure was calculated from radial applanation tonometry. RESULTS: Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for a small-to-medium group × time interaction effect on aortic reservoir pressure, indicating a positive adaptation following 1HIIT compared with 4HIIT and MICT [F (2,46) = 2.9, P = 0.07, η = 0.06]. This is supported by our within-group analysis wherein only 1HIIT significantly decreased aortic reservoir pressure from pre to postintervention (pre-post: 1HIIT 33 ± 16 to 31 ± 13, P = 0.03; MICT 29 ± 9-28 ± 8, P = 0.78; 4HIIT 28 ± 10-30 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Three sessions of 4 min of high-intensity exercise per week (12 min/week) was sufficient to improve aortic reservoir pressure, and thus may be a time-efficient exercise modality for reducing cardiovascular risk in individuals with MetS.
Authors: Eduardo Caldas Costa; Jacqueline L Hay; Dustin S Kehler; Kevin F Boreskie; Rakesh C Arora; Daniel Umpierre; Andrea Szwajcer; Todd A Duhamel Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Joyce S Ramos; Lance C Dalleck; Fabio Borrani; Alistair R Mallard; Bronwyn Clark; Shelley E Keating; Robert G Fassett; Jeff S Coombes Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; Paula Andrea Hernández-Quiñones; Alejandra Tordecilla-Sanders; Cristian Álvarez; Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo; Mikel Izquierdo; Jorge Enrique Correa-Bautista; Antonio Garcia-Hermoso; Ronald G Garcia Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 3.876