Literature DB >> 27466438

In vitro response of macrophages to ceramic scaffolds used for bone regeneration.

Pamela L Graney1, Seyed-Iman Roohani-Esfahani2, Hala Zreiqat2, Kara L Spiller3.   

Abstract

Macrophages, the primary cells of the inflammatory response, are major regulators of healing, and mediate both bone fracture healing and the inflammatory response to implanted biomaterials. However, their phenotypic contributions to biomaterial-mediated bone repair are incompletely understood. Therefore, we used gene expression and protein secretion analysis to investigate the interactions in vitro between primary human monocyte-derived macrophages and ceramic scaffolds that have been shown to have varying degrees of success in promoting bone regeneration in vivo Specifically, baghdadite (Ca3ZrSi2O9) and strontium-hardystonite-gahnite (Sr-Ca2ZnSi2O7-ZnAl2O4) scaffolds were chosen as two materials that enhanced bone regeneration in vivo in large defects under load compared with clinically used tricalcium phosphate-hydroxyapatite (TCP-HA). Principal component analysis revealed that the scaffolds differentially regulated macrophage phenotype. Temporal changes in gene expression included shifts in markers of pro-inflammatory M1, anti-inflammatory M2a and pro-remodelling M2c macrophage phenotypes. Of note, TCP-HA scaffolds promoted upregulation of many M1-related genes and downregulation of many M2a- and M2c-related genes. Effects of the scaffolds on macrophages were attributed primarily to direct cell-scaffold interactions because of only minor changes observed in transwell culture. Ultimately, elucidating macrophage-biomaterial interactions will facilitate the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials for bone repair.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone repair; immunomodulation; macrophage phenotype; macrophage–biomaterial interactions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27466438      PMCID: PMC4971223          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  55 in total

Review 1.  Angiogenesis and bone repair.

Authors:  Richard A D Carano; Ellen H Filvaroff
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Osteal macrophages promote in vivo intramembranous bone healing in a mouse tibial injury model.

Authors:  Kylie A Alexander; Ming K Chang; Erin R Maylin; Thomas Kohler; Ralph Müller; Andy C Wu; Nico Van Rooijen; Matthew J Sweet; David A Hume; Liza J Raggatt; Allison R Pettit
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Hypoxia-mimicking bioactive glass/collagen glycosaminoglycan composite scaffolds to enhance angiogenesis and bone repair.

Authors:  Elaine Quinlan; Sonia Partap; Maria M Azevedo; Gavin Jell; Molly M Stevens; Fergal J O'Brien
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Impaired angiogenesis, early callus formation, and late stage remodeling in fracture healing of osteopontin-deficient mice.

Authors:  Craig L Duvall; W Robert Taylor; Daiana Weiss; Abigail M Wojtowicz; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Biomaterial surface chemistry dictates adherent monocyte/macrophage cytokine expression in vitro.

Authors:  W G Brodbeck; Y Nakayama; T Matsuda; E Colton; N P Ziats; J M Anderson
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 3.861

6.  Matrix metalloproteinase-driven endochondral fracture union proceeds independently of osteoclast activity.

Authors:  Michelle M McDonald; Alyson Morse; Kathy Mikulec; Lauren Peacock; Paul A Baldock; Paul J Kostenuik; David G Little
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Zinc modulates mRNA levels of cytokines.

Authors:  Bin Bao; Ananda S Prasad; Frances W J Beck; Michele Godmere
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 4.310

8.  Macrophages in bone fracture healing: Their essential role in endochondral ossification.

Authors:  Claudia Schlundt; Thaqif El Khassawna; Alessandro Serra; Anke Dienelt; Sebastian Wendler; Hanna Schell; Nico van Rooijen; Andreas Radbruch; Richard Lucius; Susanne Hartmann; Georg N Duda; Katharina Schmidt-Bleek
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Osteopontin functions as an opsonin and facilitates phagocytosis by macrophages of hydroxyapatite-coated microspheres: implications for bone wound healing.

Authors:  Claudio E Pedraza; Liliya G Nikolcheva; Mari T Kaartinen; Jake E Barralet; Marc D McKee
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Integrated Transcriptomics Establish Macrophage Polarization Signatures and have Potential Applications for Clinical Health and Disease.

Authors:  Matheus Becker; Marco A De Bastiani; Mariana M Parisi; Fátima T C R Guma; Melissa M Markoski; Mauro A A Castro; Mark H Kaplan; Florencia M Barbé-Tuana; Fábio Klamt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  12 in total

1.  Characterizing the Macrophage Response to Immunomodulatory Biomaterials Through Gene Set Analyses.

Authors:  Sarah E Blatt; Emily B Lurier; Gregory E Risser; Kara L Spiller
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Transcriptome analysis of IL-10-stimulated (M2c) macrophages by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Emily B Lurier; Donald Dalton; Will Dampier; Pichai Raman; Sina Nassiri; Nicole M Ferraro; Ramakrishan Rajagopalan; Mahdi Sarmady; Kara L Spiller
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.144

Review 3.  Macrophage and Fibroblast Interactions in Biomaterial-Mediated Fibrosis.

Authors:  Claire E Witherel; Daniel Abebayehu; Thomas H Barker; Kara L Spiller
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Deconvolution of heterogeneous wound tissue samples into relative macrophage phenotype composition via models based on gene expression.

Authors:  Nicole M Ferraro; Will Dampier; Michael S Weingarten; Kara L Spiller
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 5.  Bone physiology as inspiration for tissue regenerative therapies.

Authors:  Diana Lopes; Cláudia Martins-Cruz; Mariana B Oliveira; João F Mano
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Genipin guides and sustains the polarization of macrophages to the pro-regenerative M2 subtype via activation of the pSTAT6-PPAR-gamma pathway.

Authors:  Ilaha Isali; Phillip McClellan; Eswar Shankar; Sanjay Gupta; Mukesh Jain; James M Anderson; Adonis Hijaz; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 10.633

Review 7.  Designing biomaterials with immunomodulatory properties for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  James I Andorko; Christopher M Jewell
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2017-05-16

Review 8.  Doped Calcium Silicate Ceramics: A New Class of Candidates for Synthetic Bone Substitutes.

Authors:  Young Jung No; Jiao Jiao Li; Hala Zreiqat
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  Macrophages and bone inflammation.

Authors:  Qiaoli Gu; Huilin Yang; Qin Shi
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  The Role of the Chemokine System in Tissue Response to Prosthetic By-products Leading to Periprosthetic Osteolysis and Aseptic Loosening.

Authors:  Tereza Dyskova; Jiri Gallo; Eva Kriegova
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.