Literature DB >> 23408642

Matrix metalloproteinase-driven endochondral fracture union proceeds independently of osteoclast activity.

Michelle M McDonald1, Alyson Morse, Kathy Mikulec, Lauren Peacock, Paul A Baldock, Paul J Kostenuik, David G Little.   

Abstract

As new insights into the complexities of endochondral fracture repair emerge, the temporal role of osteoclast activity remains ambiguous. With numerous antiresorptive agents available to treat bone disease, understanding their impact on bone repair is vital. Further, in light of recent work suggesting osteoclast activity may not be necessary during early endochondral fracture union, we hypothesize instead a pivotal role of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) secreting cells in driving this process. Although the role of MMPs in fracture healing has been examined, no directly comparative experiments exist. We examined a number of antiresorptive treatments to either block osteoclast activity, including the potent bisphosphonates zoledronic acid (ZA) and clodronate (CLOD), which work via differing mechanisms, or antagonize osteoclastogenesis with recombinant OPG (HuOPG-Fc), comparing these directly to an inhibitor of MMP activity (MMI270). Endochondral ossification to union occurred normally in all antiresorptive groups. In contrast, MMP inhibition greatly impaired endochondral union, significantly delaying cartilage callus removal. MMP inhibition also produced smaller, denser hard calluses. Hard callus remodeling was, as expected, delayed with ZA, CLOD, and OPG treatment at 4 and 6 weeks, resulting in larger, more mineralized calluses at 6 weeks. As a result of reduced hard callus turnover, bone formation was reduced with antiresorptive agents at these time points. These results confirm that the achievement of endochondral fracture union occurs independently of osteoclast activity. Alternatively, MMP secretion by invading cells is obligatory to endochondral union. This study provides new insight into cellular contributions to bone repair and may abate concerns regarding antiresorptive therapies impeding initial fracture union.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23408642     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  9 in total

Review 1.  Overview of biological mechanisms and applications of three murine models of bone repair: closed fracture with intramedullary fixation, distraction osteogenesis, and marrow ablation by reaming.

Authors:  Beth Bragdon; Kyle Lybrand; Louis Gerstenfeld
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2015-03-02

Review 2.  Diaphyseal long bone nonunions - types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Markus Rupp; Christoph Biehl; Matthäus Budak; Ulrich Thormann; Christian Heiss; Volker Alt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  In vitro response of macrophages to ceramic scaffolds used for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Pamela L Graney; Seyed-Iman Roohani-Esfahani; Hala Zreiqat; Kara L Spiller
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Unraveling macrophage contributions to bone repair.

Authors:  Andy C Wu; Liza J Raggatt; Kylie A Alexander; Allison R Pettit
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2013-06-26

5.  FOXO1 expression in chondrocytes modulates cartilage production and removal in fracture healing.

Authors:  Zhenjiang Ding; Min Qiu; Mohammed A Alharbi; Tiffany Huang; Xiyan Pei; Tatyana N Milovanova; Hongli Jiao; Chanyi Lu; Min Liu; Ling Qin; Dana T Graves
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.626

6.  Dexamethasone enhances osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow- and muscle-derived stromal cells and augments ectopic bone formation induced by bone morphogenetic protein-2.

Authors:  Masato Yuasa; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Takashi Taniyama; Tomokazu Masaoka; Wei Xuetao; Toshitaka Yoshii; Masaki Horie; Hiroaki Yasuda; Toshimasa Uemura; Atsushi Okawa; Shinichi Sotome
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ablation of Y1 receptor impairs osteoclast bone-resorbing activity.

Authors:  Daniela M Sousa; Francisco Conceição; Diana I Silva; Luís Leitão; Estrela Neto; Cecília J Alves; Inês S Alencastre; Herbert Herzog; Paulo Aguiar; Meriem Lamghari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Fracture healing physiology and the quest for therapies for delayed healing and nonunion.

Authors:  Paul Kostenuik; Faisal M Mirza
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  Sclerostin, an emerging therapeutic target for treating osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture: A general review.

Authors:  Pui Kit Suen; Ling Qin
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.