Literature DB >> 27465919

The chronic lymphocytic leukemia international prognostic index predicts time to first treatment in early CLL: Independent validation in a prospective cohort of early stage patients.

Stefano Molica1, Tait D Shanafelt2, Diana Giannarelli3, Massimo Gentile4, Rosanna Mirabelli5, Giovanna Cutrona6, Luciano Levato5, Nicola Di Renzo7, Francesco Di Raimondo8, Caterina Musolino9, Francesco Angrilli10, Angelo Famà11, Anna Grazia Recchia12, Kari G Chaffee13, Antonino Neri14, Neil E Kay2, Manlio Ferrarini15, Fortunato Morabito4.   

Abstract

The chronic lymphocytic leukemia International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) combines 5 parameters (age, clinical stage, TP53 status [normal vs. del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation], IGHV mutational status, serum β2-microglobulin) to predict survival and time-to-first-treatment (TTFT) in CLL patients. We performed an observational study in 337 prospectively collected, Binet stage A patients to validate the ability of the CLL-IPI to predict TTFT in an independent cohort of early stage CLL patients. The CLL-IPI score stratified Binet stage A patients into three subgroups with different outcome. Since the CLL-IPI was originally developed to predict survival, we next investigated the optimal cut-off score to predict TTFT in Binet stage A patients. Recursive partitioning analysis identified three subsets with scores of 0 (n = 139), 1 (n = 90), and ≥ 2(n = 108). The probability of remaining free from therapy 5 years after diagnosis was 85%, 67% and 46% in these three categories (P < 0.0001.; C-statistic:c = 0.72; 95% CI:0.58-0.81). This optimized CLL-IPI scoring for TTFT was subsequently validated in an independent cohort of Binet A patients from the Mayo Clinic (n = 525). The ability of either original or optimized CLL-IPI to predict TTFT was equivalent to other prognostic models specifically designed for this endpoint (2011 MDACC score and O-CLL1 score). Although originally developed to predict suvival, the CLL-IPI is useful for predicting TTFT in early stage CLL patients. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1090-1095, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  leukemia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27465919      PMCID: PMC5072993          DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  22 in total

1.  Improving survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (1980-2008): the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona experience.

Authors:  Pau Abrisqueta; Arturo Pereira; Ciril Rozman; Marta Aymerich; Eva Giné; Carol Moreno; Ana Muntañola; María Rozman; Neus Villamor; Kate Hodgson; Elías Campo; Francesc Bosch; Emili Montserrat
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Age at diagnosis and the utility of prognostic testing in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Tait D Shanafelt; Kari G Rabe; Neil E Kay; Clive S Zent; Diane F Jelinek; Megan S Reinalda; Susan M Schwager; Debbie A Bowen; Susan L Slager; Curtis A Hanson; Timothy G Call
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Chlorambucil in indolent chronic lymphocytic leukemia. French Cooperative Group on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  G Dighiero; K Maloum; B Desablens; B Cazin; M Navarro; R Leblay; M Leporrier; J Jaubert; G Lepeu; B Dreyfus; J L Binet; P Travade
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prognostic nomogram and index for overall survival in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  William G Wierda; Susan O'Brien; Xuemei Wang; Stefan Faderl; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Kim-Anh Do; Jorge Cortes; Deborah Thomas; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Charles Koller; Miloslav Beran; Francis Giles; Farhad Ravandi; Susan Lerner; Hagop Kantarjian; Michael Keating
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  TP53 mutation and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Thorsten Zenz; Barbara Eichhorst; Raymonde Busch; Tina Denzel; Sonja Häbe; Dirk Winkler; Andreas Bühler; Jennifer Edelmann; Manuela Bergmann; Georg Hopfinger; Manfred Hensel; Michael Hallek; Hartmut Döhner; Stephan Stilgenbauer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Guidelines for clinical protocols for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: recommendations of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored working group.

Authors:  B D Cheson; J M Bennett; K R Rai; M R Grever; N E Kay; C A Schiffer; M M Oken; M J Keating; D H Boldt; S J Kempin
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 10.047

7.  An international prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL-IPI): a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines.

Authors:  Michael Hallek; Bruce D Cheson; Daniel Catovsky; Federico Caligaris-Cappio; Guillaume Dighiero; Hartmut Döhner; Peter Hillmen; Michael J Keating; Emili Montserrat; Kanti R Rai; Thomas J Kipps
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  CD49d is the strongest flow cytometry-based predictor of overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Pietro Bulian; Tait D Shanafelt; Chris Fegan; Antonella Zucchetto; Lilla Cro; Holger Nückel; Luca Baldini; Antonina V Kurtova; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Jan A Burger; Gianluca Gaidano; Giovanni Del Poeta; Chris Pepper; Davide Rossi; Valter Gattei
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Mutations driving CLL and their evolution in progression and relapse.

Authors:  Dan A Landau; Eugen Tausch; Amaro N Taylor-Weiner; Chip Stewart; Johannes G Reiter; Jasmin Bahlo; Sandra Kluth; Ivana Bozic; Mike Lawrence; Sebastian Böttcher; Scott L Carter; Kristian Cibulskis; Daniel Mertens; Carrie L Sougnez; Mara Rosenberg; Julian M Hess; Jennifer Edelmann; Sabrina Kless; Michael Kneba; Matthias Ritgen; Anna Fink; Kirsten Fischer; Stacey Gabriel; Eric S Lander; Martin A Nowak; Hartmut Döhner; Michael Hallek; Donna Neuberg; Gad Getz; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Catherine J Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  18 in total

1.  Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: from molecular pathogenesis to novel therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Julio Delgado; Ferran Nadeu; Dolors Colomer; Elias Campo
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Validation of the CLL-IPI and comparison with the MDACC prognostic index in newly diagnosed patients.

Authors:  Massimo Gentile; Tait D Shanafelt; Davide Rossi; Luca Laurenti; Francesca R Mauro; Stefano Molica; Giovanna Cutrona; Giuseppina Uccello; Melissa Campanelli; Ernesto Vigna; Giovanni Tripepi; Kari G Chaffee; Sameer A Parikh; Sabrina Bossio; Anna Grazia Recchia; Idanna Innocenti; Raffaella Pasquale; Antonino Neri; Manlio Ferrarini; Gianluca Gaidano; Robin Foà; Fortunato Morabito
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Tumor mutational load predicts time to first treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis beyond the CLL international prognostic index.

Authors:  Geffen Kleinstern; Daniel R O'Brien; Xing Li; Shulan Tian; Brian F Kabat; Kari G Rabe; Aaron D Norman; Huihuang Yan; Celine M Vachon; Nicholas J Boddicker; Timothy G Call; Sameer A Parikh; Laura Bruins; Cecilia Bonolo de Campos; Jose F Leis; Tait D Shanafelt; Wei Ding; James R Cerhan; Neil E Kay; Susan L Slager; Esteban Braggio
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 4.  Treatment-naive CLL: lessons from phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials.

Authors:  Jennifer A Woyach
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 5.  IGHV mutational status testing in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Jennifer Crombie; Matthew S Davids
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 6.  Prognostication of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of new agents.

Authors:  Barbara Eichhorst; Michael Hallek
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

Review 7.  Treatment-naive CLL: lessons from phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials.

Authors:  Jennifer A Woyach
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Prognostic Factors in the Era of Targeted Therapies in CLL.

Authors:  Prajwal Boddu; Alessandra Ferrajoli
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.952

9.  Early Intervention with Lenalidomide in Patients with High-risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Shanmugapriya Thangavadivel; Qiuhong Zhao; Narendranath Epperla; Lindsey Rike; Xiaokui Mo; Mohamed Badawi; Darlene M Bystry; Mitch A Phelps; Leslie A Andritsos; Kerry A Rogers; Jeffrey Jones; Jennifer A Woyach; John C Byrd; Farrukh T Awan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nina Kreuzberger; Johanna Aag Damen; Marialena Trivella; Lise J Estcourt; Angela Aldin; Lisa Umlauff; Maria Dla Vazquez-Montes; Robert Wolff; Karel Gm Moons; Ina Monsef; Farid Foroutan; Karl-Anton Kreuzer; Nicole Skoetz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.