Literature DB >> 20697090

TP53 mutation and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Thorsten Zenz1, Barbara Eichhorst, Raymonde Busch, Tina Denzel, Sonja Häbe, Dirk Winkler, Andreas Bühler, Jennifer Edelmann, Manuela Bergmann, Georg Hopfinger, Manfred Hensel, Michael Hallek, Hartmut Döhner, Stephan Stilgenbauer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The precise prognostic impact of TP53 mutation and its incorporation into treatment algorithms in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unclear. We set out to define the impact of TP53 mutations in CLL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed TP53 mutations by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (exons 2 to 11) in a randomized prospective trial (n = 375) with a follow-up of 52.8 months (German CLL Study Group CLL4 trial; fludarabine [F] v F + cyclophosphamide [FC]).
RESULTS: We found TP53 mutations in 8.5% of patients (28 of 328 patients). None of the patients with TP53 mutation showed a complete response. In patients with TP53 mutation, compared with patients without TP53 mutation, median progression-free survival (PFS; 23.3 v 62.2 months, respectively) and overall survival (OS; 29.2 v 84.6 months, respectively) were significantly decreased (both P < .001). TP53 mutations in the absence of 17p deletions were found in 4.5% of patients. PFS and OS for patients with 17p deletion and patients with TP53 mutation in the absence of 17p deletion were similar. Multivariate analysis identified TP53 mutation as the strongest prognostic marker regarding PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.8; P < .001) and OS (HR = 7.2; P < .001). Other independent predictors of OS were IGHV mutation status (HR = 1.9), 11q deletion (HR = 1.9), 17p deletion (HR = 2.3), and FC treatment arm (HR = 0.6).
CONCLUSION: CLL with TP53 mutation carries a poor prognosis regardless of the presence of 17p deletion when treated with F-based chemotherapy. Thus, TP53 mutation analysis should be incorporated into the evaluation of patients with CLL before treatment initiation. Patients with TP53 mutation should be considered for alternative treatment approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20697090     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.8762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  184 in total

Review 1.  Can prognostic factors be used to direct therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia?

Authors:  Leopold Sellner; Sascha Dietrich; Peter Dreger; Hanno Glimm; Thorsten Zenz
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Risk categories and refractory CLL in the era of chemoimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Thorsten Zenz; John G Gribben; Michael Hallek; Hartmut Döhner; Michael J Keating; Stephan Stilgenbauer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Emerging patterns of somatic mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Ian R Watson; Koichi Takahashi; P Andrew Futreal; Lynda Chin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with flavopiridol: impact of genetic features.

Authors:  J A Woyach; G Lozanski; A S Ruppert; A Lozanski; K A Blum; J A Jones; J M Flynn; A J Johnson; M R Grever; N A Heerema; J C Byrd
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Does total body irradiation conditioning improve outcomes of myeloablative human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling transplantations for chronic lymphocytic leukemia?

Authors:  Mitchell Sabloff; Ronald M Sobecks; Kwang Woo Ahn; Xiaochun Zhu; Marcos de Lima; Jennifer R Brown; Yoshihiro Inamoto; H Kent Holland; Mahmoud D Aljurf; Mary J Laughlin; Rammurti T Kamble; Jack W Hsu; Baldeep M Wirk; Matthew Seftel; Ian D Lewis; Mukta Arora; Edwin P Alyea; Matt E Kalaycio; Jorge Cortes; Richard T Maziarz; Robert Peter Gale; Wael Saber
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Genomic imbalance defines three prognostic groups for risk stratification of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Jane Houldsworth; Asha Guttapalli; Venkata Thodima; Xiao Jie Yan; Geetu Mendiratta; Tania Zielonka; Gouri Nanjangud; Weiyi Chen; Sujata Patil; Anthony Mato; Jennifer R Brown; Kanti Rai; Nicholas Chiorazzi; R S K Chaganti
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-11-12

7.  Genetic lesions associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia chemo-refractoriness.

Authors:  Monica Messina; Ilaria Del Giudice; Hossein Khiabanian; Davide Rossi; Sabina Chiaretti; Silvia Rasi; Valeria Spina; Antony B Holmes; Marilisa Marinelli; Giulia Fabbri; Alfonso Piciocchi; Francesca R Mauro; Anna Guarini; Gianluca Gaidano; Riccardo Dalla-Favera; Laura Pasqualucci; Raul Rabadan; Robin Foà
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Evolving Strategies for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the Upfront Setting.

Authors:  Spencer H Bachow; Nicole Lamanna
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.952

9.  Real-world results of ibrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: data from 95 consecutive patients treated in a compassionate use program. A study from the Swedish Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Group.

Authors:  Maria Winqvist; Anna Asklid; P O Andersson; Karin Karlsson; Claes Karlsson; Birgitta Lauri; Jeanette Lundin; Mattias Mattsson; Stefan Norin; Anna Sandstedt; Lotta Hansson; Anders Österborg
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab treatment achieves long-term disease-free survival in IGHV-mutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Philip A Thompson; Constantine S Tam; Susan M O'Brien; William G Wierda; Francesco Stingo; William Plunkett; Susan C Smith; Hagop M Kantarjian; Emil J Freireich; Michael J Keating
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.