PURPOSE: The precise prognostic impact of TP53 mutation and its incorporation into treatment algorithms in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unclear. We set out to define the impact of TP53 mutations in CLL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed TP53 mutations by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (exons 2 to 11) in a randomized prospective trial (n = 375) with a follow-up of 52.8 months (German CLL Study Group CLL4 trial; fludarabine [F] v F + cyclophosphamide [FC]). RESULTS: We found TP53 mutations in 8.5% of patients (28 of 328 patients). None of the patients with TP53 mutation showed a complete response. In patients with TP53 mutation, compared with patients without TP53 mutation, median progression-free survival (PFS; 23.3 v 62.2 months, respectively) and overall survival (OS; 29.2 v 84.6 months, respectively) were significantly decreased (both P < .001). TP53 mutations in the absence of 17p deletions were found in 4.5% of patients. PFS and OS for patients with 17p deletion and patients with TP53 mutation in the absence of 17p deletion were similar. Multivariate analysis identified TP53 mutation as the strongest prognostic marker regarding PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.8; P < .001) and OS (HR = 7.2; P < .001). Other independent predictors of OS were IGHV mutation status (HR = 1.9), 11q deletion (HR = 1.9), 17p deletion (HR = 2.3), and FC treatment arm (HR = 0.6). CONCLUSION: CLL with TP53 mutation carries a poor prognosis regardless of the presence of 17p deletion when treated with F-based chemotherapy. Thus, TP53 mutation analysis should be incorporated into the evaluation of patients with CLL before treatment initiation. Patients with TP53 mutation should be considered for alternative treatment approaches.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The precise prognostic impact of TP53 mutation and its incorporation into treatment algorithms in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unclear. We set out to define the impact of TP53 mutations in CLL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed TP53 mutations by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (exons 2 to 11) in a randomized prospective trial (n = 375) with a follow-up of 52.8 months (German CLL Study Group CLL4 trial; fludarabine [F] v F + cyclophosphamide [FC]). RESULTS: We found TP53 mutations in 8.5% of patients (28 of 328 patients). None of the patients with TP53 mutation showed a complete response. In patients with TP53 mutation, compared with patients without TP53 mutation, median progression-free survival (PFS; 23.3 v 62.2 months, respectively) and overall survival (OS; 29.2 v 84.6 months, respectively) were significantly decreased (both P < .001). TP53 mutations in the absence of 17p deletions were found in 4.5% of patients. PFS and OS for patients with 17p deletion and patients with TP53 mutation in the absence of 17p deletion were similar. Multivariate analysis identified TP53 mutation as the strongest prognostic marker regarding PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.8; P < .001) and OS (HR = 7.2; P < .001). Other independent predictors of OS were IGHV mutation status (HR = 1.9), 11q deletion (HR = 1.9), 17p deletion (HR = 2.3), and FC treatment arm (HR = 0.6). CONCLUSION: CLL with TP53 mutation carries a poor prognosis regardless of the presence of 17p deletion when treated with F-based chemotherapy. Thus, TP53 mutation analysis should be incorporated into the evaluation of patients with CLL before treatment initiation. Patients with TP53 mutation should be considered for alternative treatment approaches.
Authors: Thorsten Zenz; John G Gribben; Michael Hallek; Hartmut Döhner; Michael J Keating; Stephan Stilgenbauer Journal: Blood Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: J A Woyach; G Lozanski; A S Ruppert; A Lozanski; K A Blum; J A Jones; J M Flynn; A J Johnson; M R Grever; N A Heerema; J C Byrd Journal: Leukemia Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Mitchell Sabloff; Ronald M Sobecks; Kwang Woo Ahn; Xiaochun Zhu; Marcos de Lima; Jennifer R Brown; Yoshihiro Inamoto; H Kent Holland; Mahmoud D Aljurf; Mary J Laughlin; Rammurti T Kamble; Jack W Hsu; Baldeep M Wirk; Matthew Seftel; Ian D Lewis; Mukta Arora; Edwin P Alyea; Matt E Kalaycio; Jorge Cortes; Richard T Maziarz; Robert Peter Gale; Wael Saber Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2013-12-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Jane Houldsworth; Asha Guttapalli; Venkata Thodima; Xiao Jie Yan; Geetu Mendiratta; Tania Zielonka; Gouri Nanjangud; Weiyi Chen; Sujata Patil; Anthony Mato; Jennifer R Brown; Kanti Rai; Nicholas Chiorazzi; R S K Chaganti Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2013-11-12
Authors: Maria Winqvist; Anna Asklid; P O Andersson; Karin Karlsson; Claes Karlsson; Birgitta Lauri; Jeanette Lundin; Mattias Mattsson; Stefan Norin; Anna Sandstedt; Lotta Hansson; Anders Österborg Journal: Haematologica Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Philip A Thompson; Constantine S Tam; Susan M O'Brien; William G Wierda; Francesco Stingo; William Plunkett; Susan C Smith; Hagop M Kantarjian; Emil J Freireich; Michael J Keating Journal: Blood Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 22.113