Joseph E Cruz1,2, Ashley Ward3, Shannon Anthony3, Susanna Chang4, Hyun Billy Bae5, Evelyn R Hermes-DeSantis3,6. 1. Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA Joseph.Cruz@Rutgers.edu. 2. Department of Pharmacy, Englewood Hospital Medical Center, Englewood, NJ, USA. 3. Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA. 4. Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. 5. Englewood Hospital Medical Center, Englewood, NJ, USA. 6. Department of Pharmacy, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence for using intravenous (IV) epoprostenol to treat Raynaud's phenomenon (RP). DATA SOURCES: The databases MEDLINE (1946 to March 2016), PubMed, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched using the terms epoprostenol, Flolan, Raynaud's disease, and CREST syndrome. Further literature sources were identified by reviewing article citations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language, clinical trials and case series evaluating IV epoprostenol for the management or treatment of RP were included. Lower-quality evidence were incorporated due to limited information. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven small uncontrolled studies/case series, 1 small placebo controlled study, and 1 larger randomized trial were identified and included. There was no consistent measurement of efficacy utilized, but improvements in hand temperature, RP attack duration and frequency were commonly associated with IV epoprostenol treatment (5 trials). There were conflicting data regarding effect sustainability, with 5 trials showing long-term effects and 3 showing immediate effects. Fewer ischemic ulcers developed during treatment with IV epoprostenol in 1 trial compared to conventional treatment. Ulcer healing ocurred in 2 trials. Common adverse effects included hypotension, headache, flushing, gastrointestinal symptoms, and jaw pain. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence supports the use of IV epoprostenol for treatment of severe RP in patients refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. The dose, titration schedule, and duration of IV epoprostenol utilized in studies varied, but a conservative approach to initiation should be considered. Patients who do not respond to intermittent infusions and have severe digital ischemia may require more aggressive regimens.
OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence for using intravenous (IV) epoprostenol to treat Raynaud's phenomenon (RP). DATA SOURCES: The databases MEDLINE (1946 to March 2016), PubMed, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched using the terms epoprostenol, Flolan, Raynaud's disease, and CREST syndrome. Further literature sources were identified by reviewing article citations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language, clinical trials and case series evaluating IV epoprostenol for the management or treatment of RP were included. Lower-quality evidence were incorporated due to limited information. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven small uncontrolled studies/case series, 1 small placebo controlled study, and 1 larger randomized trial were identified and included. There was no consistent measurement of efficacy utilized, but improvements in hand temperature, RP attack duration and frequency were commonly associated with IV epoprostenol treatment (5 trials). There were conflicting data regarding effect sustainability, with 5 trials showing long-term effects and 3 showing immediate effects. Fewer ischemic ulcers developed during treatment with IV epoprostenol in 1 trial compared to conventional treatment. Ulcer healing ocurred in 2 trials. Common adverse effects included hypotension, headache, flushing, gastrointestinal symptoms, and jaw pain. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence supports the use of IV epoprostenol for treatment of severe RP in patients refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. The dose, titration schedule, and duration of IV epoprostenol utilized in studies varied, but a conservative approach to initiation should be considered. Patients who do not respond to intermittent infusions and have severe digital ischemia may require more aggressive regimens.