| Literature DB >> 27465044 |
Lihong Zhu1, Chen Ni2, Baijun Dong3, Yong Zhang4, Yuefeng Shi1, Haitao Niu5, Chong Li6.
Abstract
Tumor recurrence is still a major challenge for clinical treatment of bladder cancer. Cumulative evidences indicate cancer stem cells (CSCs) contribute to drug resistance and leave a putative source for disease relapse. Identifying novel agents targeting CSCs may represent a new paradigm in the therapy of bladder cancer. Here, we separated a novel hedgehog (Hh) inhibitor, iG2, from streptomyces roseofulvus, which dramatically blocked the activation of Gli2 in bladder cancer cells. The iG2 strongly repressed the growth of cancer cells rather than the peri-tumor stroma cells. Attenuated proliferation and enhanced apoptosis of tumor cells were observed upon iG2 stimulation. Furthermore, iG2 reduced the self-renewal ability of bladder CSCs as well as the tumor formation. Collectively, iG2 is potentially used as a novel therapeutic agent for bladder cancer by targeting self-renewal through inhibiting Hh pathway.Entities:
Keywords: Bladder cancer; Gli2; hedgehog; iG2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27465044 PMCID: PMC5055183 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.802
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Figure 1Inhibition of Hh pathway by iG2 in bladder cancer cells. (A) The chemical structure of iG2. (B) Inhibition of Gli2, Gli1 and Jag2 by iG2. Tumor cells from patient 1# were stimulated with iG2 at indicated concentration for 24 h. The expression of Gli2, Gli1 and Jag2 in whole protein lysates was determined by western blot. (C) Inhibition of the colorectal cancer cell growth in vitro by iG2. Tumor cells were separated from four cancer patients and stimulated with iG2 (1 M) for indicated time. The incorporation of [3H]‐TdR into tumor cells was examined. (D) Dose‐dependent inhibition of UTR‐mediated luciferase Gli2 reporter expression and cytotoxicity measurements in HEK293 cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of n = 3 replicates. (E) Gli2 inhibition (as measured by ELISA) and cytotoxicity in T24 cells following iG2 treatment. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of n = 3 replicates. (F) IC 50 of iG2 as to cancer cells and adjacent nontumor cells from six patients.
Figure 2Attenuated proliferation and enhanced apoptosis upon iG2. (A–B) Cancer cells from patient 1# and 2# were treated with iG2 and the cell cycle was determined with BrdU staining (A) or Ki67 staining (B). (C) Cancer cells from patient #1 and #2 were treated with iG2 at indicated concentrations and the cell apoptosis was determined.
Figure 3Impairment of cancer cell self‐renewal by iG2. (A) Reduction in cancer cell attachment to matrigel by iG2. (B) Cancer cell migration through transwell was suppressed by iG2. (C) Inhibition of cancer cell colony formation by iG2. (D) Oncosphere numbers were decreased by iG2 stimulation. (E) Tumor formation capability was attenuated by iG2.
Figure 4Tumor growth of bladder cancer cells was inhibited by iG2. (A–B) Tumor growth (A) and weight (B) were reduced by iG2 in vivo. Tumor cells from two patients were inoculated to nude mice (n = 12). Tumor growth was monitored and tumor weight was determined at day 30. (C) Survival of mice was increased by iG2 treatment. (D) Gli2 sensitized tumor to iG2 treatment. Tumor cells from patient 1# were transfected with shCtl and shGli2. Stable transfected cell lines were treated with gradient concentration of iG2 for 24 h. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.