Literature DB >> 27464617

Manometric Changes to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter After Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in Patients With Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Heather F Warren1, Brian E Louie, Alexander S Farivar, Candice Wilshire, Ralph W Aye.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the manometric changes, function, and impact of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES).
BACKGROUND: Implantation of a MSA around the gastroesophageal junction has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease, but its effect on the LES has not been elucidated.
METHODS: Retrospective case control study (n = 121) evaluating manometric changes after MSA. Inclusion criteria consisted of a confirmed diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease by an abnormal esophageal pH study (body mass index <35 kg/m, hiatal hernia <3 cm, and absence of endoscopic Barrett disease). Manometric changes, pH testing, and proton pump inhibitor use were assessed preoperatively and 6 and 12 months after MSA.
RESULTS: MSA was associated with an overall increase in the median LES resting pressure (18 pre-MSA vs 23 mm Hg post-MSA; P = 0.0003), residual pressure (4 vs 9 mm Hg; P < 0.0001), and distal esophageal contraction amplitude (80 vs 90 mm Hg; P = 0.02). The percent peristalsis remained unaltered (94% vs 87%; P = 0.71).Overall, patients with a manometrically defective LES were restored 67% of the time to a normal sphincter with MSA. Those with a structurally defective or severely defective LES improved to a normal LES in 77% and 56% of patients, respectively. Only 18% of patients with a normal preoperative manometric LES deteriorated to a lower category.
CONCLUSION: MSA results in significant manometric improvement of the LES without apparent deleterious effects on the esophageal body. A manometrically defective LES can be restored to normal sphincter, whereas a normal LES remains stable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27464617     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  8 in total

1.  Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Heather F Warren; Lisa M Brown; Matias Mihura; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Magnet-assist endoscopic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: cadaveric and survival studies in a porcine model (with video).

Authors:  Akira Dobashi; Jodie L Deters; Charles A Miller; Crystal J Lavey; Elizabeth Rajan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Comparison of the outcome of laparoscopic procedures for GERD.

Authors:  Fabrizio Rebecchi; Marco Ettore Allaix; Lorenzo Cinti; Milica Nestorović; Mario Morino
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-19

4.  Does Treatment of the Hiatus Influence the Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Chronic GERD?

Authors:  Matías Mihura Irribarra; Sandra Blitz; Candice L Wilshire; Anee Sophia Jackson; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Christy M Dunst; Brian E Louie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Favorable results from a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with large hiatal hernias undergoing LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation.

Authors:  F P Buckley; Reginald C W Bell; Kate Freeman; Stephanie Doggett; Rachel Heidrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  E N Kirkham; B G Main; K J B Jones; J M Blazeby; N S Blencowe
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Measurement of outflow resistance imposed by magnetic sphincter augmentation: defining normal values and clinical implication.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Andrew D Grubic; Ping Zheng; Ali H Zaidi; Katrin Schwameis; Adam C Alleyne; Brittney M Myers; Ashten N Omstead; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Three-year clinical experience with magnetic sphincter augmentation and laparoscopic fundoplication.

Authors:  Luigi Bonavina; Thomas Horbach; Sebastian F Schoppmann; Janet DeMarchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.