| Literature DB >> 27463100 |
Ju-Yeun Lee1, Eun Jung Lee1, Kyung-Ah Park1, Sei Yeul Oh1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the limbus-insertion distance (LID) of the lateral rectus (LR) muscle can be a useful indicator for predicting the surgical effect of recession surgery in intermittent exotropia (IXT). Patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral LR recession for the basic type of IXT were included. The distance between the corneal limbus and the posterior edge of the insertion of LR muscle (limbus-insertion distance) was measured intraoperatively using surgical calipers (graded with 0.25 mm precision). We calculated the actual dose-response effect as the difference between the angle of preoperative deviation and the angle of postoperative deviation, and then divided the figure by the total amount of recession at postoperative months 1, 3, and 6. The correlation between the limbus-insertion distance (LID) of LR muscle and each dose-response effect was statistically analyzed. A total of 60 subjects were enrolled in this study. The mean LID of LR muscle was 5.8±0.7 mm. The dose-response effect was 3.2±1.0 prism diopters (PD)/mm at postoperative month 1, 3.4±1.0 PD/mm at postoperative month 3, and 3.4±1.1 PD/mm at postoperative month 6. The LID of the LR muscle was significantly correlated with dose-response effects in cases of unilateral and bilateral LR recession at postoperative months 3 and 6 (P = 0.01, <0.01, 0.04 and <0.01 respectively). As the LID of the LR muscle increased by 1 mm, the dose-response effect increased by 0.2PD/mm in unilateral LR recession, and by 0.4 PD/mm in bilateral LR recession at postoperative month 6. In conclusion, the LID of the LR muscle can be used as one predictor of the recession effect to assist in surgical planning for IXT. Moreover, undercorrection at the time of LR recession might be considered in patients with long LID of the LR muscle.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27463100 PMCID: PMC4962984 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Quantum of surgery used for unilateral or bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession in patients with basic-type intermittent exotropia (mm).
| Preoperative deviation | Surgery | Dosage |
|---|---|---|
| ULRc | 8.5 | |
| ULRc | 9.0 | |
| BLRc | 6.0 | |
| BLRc | 7.0 | |
| BLRc | 7.5 | |
| BLRc | 8.0 | |
| BLRc | 9.0 |
ULRc, unilateral lateral rectus muscle recession; BLRc, bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession
Patient demographics.
| Parameters | BLR recession (n = 39) | ULR recession (n = 21) | Total (n = 60) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (M/F) | 15/24 | 10/11 | 25/35 |
| Age (years) | 8±2 | 9±2 | 9±2 |
| Age at surgery (years) | 7±1 | 8±2 | 7±1 |
| Interval between onset and surgery (months) | 34±32 | 30±20 | 33±29 |
| Spherical equivalent (Diopter) | -1.4±1.8 | -1.3±1.0 | -1.4±1.4 |
| Axial length (mm) | 24±1 | 24±1 | 24±1 |
| Preoperative stereoacuity (better than 100arc/sec) | 21 (53%) | 7 (33%) | 28 (47%) |
| Preoperative exotropia (prism diopter) | 27.8±4.5 | 19.8±1.9 | 25.0±5.4 |
BLR, bilateral lateral rectus muscle; ULR, unilateral lateral rectus muscle
Differences in the limbus-insertion distance of the lateral rectus muscle and axial length between both eyes of each patient.
| Difference (mm) | Limbus-insertion distance (number (%); n = 39) | Axial length (number (%); n = 60) |
|---|---|---|
| x = 0.00 | 10 (25.6%) | 3 (5.0%) |
| 0.00<x≤0.25 | 8 (20.6%) | 43 (71.7%) |
| 0.25<x≤0.50 | 15 (38.5%) | 8 (13.4%) |
| 0.50<x≤0.75 | 2 (5.1%) | 1 (1.6%) |
| 0.75<x≤1.00 | 3 (7.7%) | 3 (5.0%) |
| 1.00<x | 1 (2.5%) | 2 (3.3%) |
Correlation between the limbus-insertion distance (LID) of the lateral rectus (LR) muscle and postoperative dose-response effect.
| Effect of LR-LID on dose-response effect | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Unilateral LR recession (n = 21) | Bilateral LR recession (n = 39) | ||||
| Estimate (95% CI) | R-square | Estimate (95% CI) | R-square | |||
| 1 mo | 0.1 (-1.1, 0.2) | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.1 (-0.3, 0.4) | 0.42 | 0.93 |
| 3 mo | 0.2 (0.1, 0.2) | 0.93 | <0.01 | 0.3 (0.0, 0.5) | 0.58 | 0.04 |
| 6 mo | 0.2 (0.1, 0.3) | 0.91 | <0.01 | 0.4 (0.2, 0.5) | 0.66 | <0.01 |
Multiple regression analysis was adjusted for age, sex, preoperative stereoacuity, preoperative amount of exodeviation, and axial length
Fig 1Relationship between the LID of the LR muscle and the dose-response effect of bilateral or unilateral LR recession surgery at postoperative months 1, 3 and 6.
(red line: regression line of bilateral LR recession, green line: regression line of unilateral LR recession)