| Literature DB >> 27462552 |
Mittal Arun1, Sardana Satish1, Pandey Anima2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To validate the ethno-therapeutic claim of the traditionally used plant Jasminum auriculatum (J. auriculatum) in skin diseases, by evaluating its wound healing potential along with its antioxidant and antimicrobial properties; so as to understand their role in wound healing.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial activity; Antioxidant activity; Hydroxyproline content; Incision; Jasminum auriculatum excision; Skin breaking strength
Year: 2016 PMID: 27462552 PMCID: PMC4930536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Figure1Effect of different extracts of J. auriculatum on excision wound expressed as percentage of wound contraction.Values are represented as mean± SEM (n=6). Data wereanalyzed by one-way Anova followed by Dunnett’s test *p<0.05 as compared to control
Effects of topical application of J. auriculatum in excision wound model
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 1.90±0.19 | 10.42±0.38 | 21.94±0.73 | 37.32±0.55 | 57.53±0.87 | 74.96±0.81 | 22.83±0.40 | 79.48±0.95 |
|
| 15.04±0.8 | 36.69±0.85 | 57.03±1.14 | 72.93±1.50 | 94.48±1.61 | 100.00±0.00 | 16.33±0.21 | 145.4±1.02 |
|
| 9.77±0.61 | 29.41±0.51 | 48.89±0.76 | 66.39±0.94 | 83.66±0.50 | 100.00±0.00 | 17.83±0.16 | 84.0±1.65 |
Values are represented as mean± SEM (n=6). Data were analyzed by one-way Anova followed by Dunnett’s test
S. E. E= Successive ethanolic extract.
p<0.05 as compared to control. Std= Nitrofurazone;
Effects of topical application of J. auriculatumin incision wound model
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 144.7±0.25 | 195.0±1.46 | 170.71±1.52 |
|
| 61.37±0.74 | 138.30±1.07 | 64.05±0.92 |
Values are represented as mean± SEM (n=6). Data wereanalyzed by one-way Anova followed by Dunnett’s test
p<0.05 as compared to control. Std= Nitrofurazone; S. E. E= Successive ethanolic extract.
Figure 2(a-f)Histopathology of skin in standard, successive ethanolic extract and control treated groups. Skin histopathology of standard(a, d), successive ethanolic extract treated group (b, e) and control group (c, f) in excision and incision wound models respectively. fb: Fibroblast cell; mnc: Mononucleated cell; epi: Epithelilization; ker:
In-vitro antioxidant activity of J. auriculatum
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 8.47±1.34 | 33.39±0.74 |
|
| ------- | 35.41±0.66 |
All values are expressed as mean± SEM of three replicate experiments; S. E. E= Successive ethanolic extract, GAE=Gallic acid equivalent, IC50= Inhibitory concentration50, DPPH= 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
Zone of inhibition of successive ethanolic extract of J.auriculatum on experimented microbes
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| 13.50±1.4 | 16.96±1.8 |
|
| 12.42±1.1 | 15.67±2.22 |
|
| 16.65±0.8 | 24.33±1.12 |
|
| 11.45±1.3 | 17.21±2.49 |
|
| 11.35±0.6 | 19.67±2.11 |
|
| ---- | 16.77±1.11 |
|
| ---- | 17.43±1.19 |
Values are expressed as mean±SD of three replicate experiments. (Ciprofloxacin and Fluconazole are the standards for bacteria and fungus, respectively). DMSO did not show any inhibitory potential.
P<0.05,
P<0.01
Minimum inhibitory concentration effects of successive ethanolic extract of J.auriculatum on experimented microbes
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| 1.56 | 2.5 |
|
| 6.25 | 2.5 |
|
| 0.78 | 1.25 |
|
| 3.125 | 2.5 |
|
| 12.5 | 2.5 |
|
| ----- | 2.5 |
|
| ----- | 2.5 |