| Literature DB >> 27462483 |
Shih Keng Loong1, Nur Hidayana Mahfodz1, Nurul Asma Anati Che Mat Seri1, Haryanti Azura Mohamad Wali2, Syahar Amir Abd Gani2, Pooi-Fong Wong3, Sazaly AbuBakar4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli, a commensal in the intestines of vertebrates, is capable of colonizing many different hosts and the environment. Commensal E. coli strains are believed to be the precursor of pathogenic strains by means of acquisition of antimicrobial resistant and virulence genes. Laboratory rodents are inherently susceptible to numerous known infectious agents, which could transfer virulence determinants to commensal E. coli. Hence, in this study, the genetic structure of commensal E. coli found in laboratory rodents and their antimicrobial resistance profiles were investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Commensal; Escherichia coli; Malaysia; Rodent
Year: 2016 PMID: 27462483 PMCID: PMC4940358 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2745-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Breed of rodents assessed between March 2014 and April 2015
| Breed | Male (n) | Female (n) |
|---|---|---|
| Sprague–Dawley rat | 10 | 10 |
| Wistar Kyoto rat | 3 | 3 |
| Spontaneously hypertensive rat | 2 | 1 |
| ICR mouse | 14 | 15 |
| BALB/c mouse | 3 | 3 |
| C57BL/6 mouse | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 67 | |
Genetic characteristics of commensal E. coli strains from rodents in the animal experimental unit
| Strain | Breeda | Organb | Sexc | Phylogenetic group | MLST locus | ST | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| UM-AEU015 | SD | GIT | F | A | 132 | 65 | 3 | 10 | 26 | 53 | 4 | 65 | 746 |
| UM-AEU018 | C57BL/6 | GIT | F | A | 132 | 65 | 3 | 10 | 26 | 53 | 4 | 65 | 746 |
| UM-AEU021 | C57BL/6 | GIT | F | A | 5 | 47 | 4 | 10 | 26 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 357 |
| UM-AEU116 | WKY | GIT | F | A | 133 | 41 | 47 | 169 | 178 | 23 | 20 | 164 | 747 |
| UM-AEU131 | ICR | GIT | F | A | 25 | 65 | 3 | 10 | 180 | 53 | 4 | 65 | 748 |
| UM-AEU140 | BALB/c | T&L | F | A | 25 | 65 | 48 | 10 | 179 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 749 |
| UM-AEU197 | ICR | Liv | F | A | 25 | 65 | 48 | 10 | 179 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 749 |
| UM-AEU198 | ICR | T&L | F | A | 25 | 65 | 48 | 10 | 179 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 749 |
| UM-AEU202 | ICR | Liv | F | A | 25 | 65 | 48 | 10 | 179 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 749 |
| UM-AEU203 | ICR | T&L | F | A | 25 | 65 | 48 | 10 | 179 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 749 |
| UM-AEU208 | ICR | T&L | F | A | 25 | 65 | 48 | 10 | 179 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 749 |
| UM-AEU213 | ICR | T&L | F | A | 25 | 65 | 48 | 10 | 179 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 749 |
| UM-AEU214 | ICR | GIT | F | A | 25 | 65 | 48 | 10 | 179 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 749 |
aBreed; SD Sprague–Dawley rat, WKY Wistar Kyoto rat, BALB/c BALB/c mouse, C57BL/6 C57BL/6 mouse, ICR ICR mouse
bOrgan; GIT gastrointestinal tract, T&L trachea and lungs, Liv liver
cSex; F female
Prevalence of ESBL producers among E. coli Strains from rodents in the animal experimental unit
| Strains | Zone diameter (mm) | ESBL producing organismb | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTXa | CTX + CAa | CAZa | CAZ + CAa | ||
|
| 6 | 28 | 7 | 20 | + |
|
| 15 | 15 | 16 | 16 | − |
| UM-AEU015 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | − |
| UM-AEU018 | 13 | 13 | 15 | 15 | − |
| UM-AEU021 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | − |
| UM-AEU116 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 16 | − |
| UM-AEU131 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 14 | − |
| UM-AEU140 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 16 | − |
| UM-AEU197 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 16 | − |
| UM-AEU198 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 14 | − |
| UM-AEU202 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 14 | − |
| UM-AEU203 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 17 | − |
| UM-AEU208 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 16 | − |
| UM-AEU213 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 16 | − |
| UM-AEU214 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 15 | − |
aCTX = cefotaxime, CTX + CA = cefotaxime-clavulanic acid, CAZ = ceftazidime, CAZ + CA = ceftazidime-clavulanic acid
bESBL producing organism; + = ESBL producer, − = non-ESBL producer
Prevalence of E. coli in the animal housing environment, rodent feed and drinking water
| Sample | Presence of | Phylogenetic groupb | Presence of ESBL genesc |
|---|---|---|---|
| Table top | − | − | NP |
| Tap | − | − | NP |
| Trolley | − | − | NP |
| Wash basin | + | B1 | − |
| Rodent feed | − | − | NP |
| Drinking water | − | − | NP |
aPresence of E. coli; + = E. coli present, − = E. coli not present
bPhylogenetic group; B1 = E. coli phylogroup B1, − = not detected
cPresence of ESBL genes; − = ESBL genes not detected, NP = not performed